Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Gao and Sons Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$91k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$37k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Religion$672kHuman Services$8kInternational$8k
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $70k
$3,130
Median grant
5
States reached
$445k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOUSTON CHINESE CHURCH$36,803
FORT BEND COMMUNITY CHURCH$22,500
CHINESE CHRISTISAN HERALD CRUSADES INC$10,840
FORT BEND CARE CENTER$8,200
CRU MINISTRIES$3,900
KERITH RAVINE MINISTRY$3,130
OMF INTERNATIONAL$2,000
LIEBENZELL USA$1,300
EAST AND WEST MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL$1,200
CHRISTAR INTERNATIONAL INC$500
WEST HOUSTON CHINESE CHURCH$150
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FORT BEND CARE CENTER: $8k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$678k · 13 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
1

Total granted

$678k
$1k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
+17%

Still filing today

54%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’24’25
ReligionEducationCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    CHINESE FAMILY FOR CHRIST
    7× · 2017–2024 · $114k · revenue +590%
  • CC
    Christian Communications Inc USA
    2× · 2020–2021 · $15k · revenue +34%
  • DT
    Dallas Theological Seminary
    2× · 2017–2018 · $2k · revenue +81%

Funded once

  • NH
    NEW HEART MUSIC MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +17%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Institute of Chinese Studies

ChinsSource is a trusted partner and platform for educating the global church on critical issues facing the church and ministries in China and for connecting Christians inside and outside China to advance the kingdom of God globally

International
2
Chinese Christian Mission Inc

To reach out to the chinese worldwide in local evangelism and foreign missions. this purpose is facilitated through the use of missionaries, evangelism training and literature.

Religion
3
Crossing Cultures International Inc

Crossing Cultures International, Inc. exists to glorify God by equipping Christ followers globally with comprehensive training for effective ministry.

Religion
4
Gets Theological Seminary

Provide theological education

Education
5
China Partner

Help churches in china fulfill the great commission through training emerging christian leaders. train leaders in evangelism, evangelistic preaching, pastoral care and leadership through seminaries and bible school in china. distribute…

6
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
7
Chinese Christian Life Fellowship Inc

To edify and make disciples of mainland china and overseas chinese christians to become devoted to only one great person: jesus christ the lord and savior and be motivated by only one greater purpose: building up his church for his glory

Religion
8
China Evangelical Seminary Association Inc

China Evangelical Seminary Association, Inc was formed for the dissemination of religious education and instruction abroad, to raise and provide funds for those purposes, for the training and educations of qualified students at the China…

Education
9
Asia Connect

The organizations mission is the support, training, and equipping of Christian missionaries to Asia, the Middle East, and Africa

Religion
10
China Ministries International Inc

To spread and promote gospel and Christian faith to China

11
Chin Baptist Churches Usa Inc

To support each of Chin Baptist and Chin Christian Churches in USA and to work among the Chins in USA for development in education, body and spirit. To carry the joint mission to spread the Good News of Jesus Chris as its biggest priority.

Religion
12
China Training Network

To Train Christian Leaders and Plant Churches in China

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Christian Communications Inc Usa and the most unlike its peers is Kerith Ravine Ministry. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FORT BEND COMMUNITY CHURCH — $258,072 · OtherFORT BEND COMMUNITY CHURCHCHINESE CHRISTISAN HERALD CRUSADES INC — $89,690 · OtherCHINESE CHRISTISAN HERALD CRUSADES INCCRU MINISTRIES — $74,200 · OtherCRU MINISTRIESHOUSTON CHINESE CHURCH — $73,454 · OtherHOUSTON CHINESE CHURCHCHINESE FAMILY FOR CHRIST USA INC — $27,500 · Other+4 more — $24,450 · OtherCHINESE FAMILY FOR CHRIST — $113,500 · Community ImprovementCHINESE FAMILY FOR…East-West Ministries International — $5,900 · ReligionKerith Ravine Ministry — $4,938 · ReligionCHRISTAR INTERNATIONAL INC — $1,250 · ReligionNEW HEART MUSIC MINISTRIES — $1,200 · ReligionFORT BEND CARE CENTER — $8,200 · Human ServicesLogos Evangelical Seminary — $4,000 · EducationDallas Theological Seminary — $2,000 · Education
Other$547,366Community Improvement$113,500Religion$13,288Human Services$8,200Education$6,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCHINESE FAMILY FOR CHRIST — $113,500 over 7y, 4.1% of budgetCHINESE FAMILY FOR CHRIST USA INC — $27,500 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetChristian Communications Inc USA — $15,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetKerith Ravine Ministry — $4,938 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetLogos Evangelical Seminary — $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDallas Theological Seminary — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTAR INTERNATIONAL INC — $1,250 over 3y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHINESE FAMILY FOR CHRIST
  • Who funds CHINESE FAMILY FOR CHRIST USA INC
  • Who funds Christian Communications Inc USA
  • Who funds FORT BEND CARE CENTER
  • Who funds East-West Ministries International
  • Who funds Kerith Ravine Ministry
  • Who funds Logos Evangelical Seminary
  • Who funds Dallas Theological Seminary
  • Who funds CHRISTAR INTERNATIONAL INC
  • Who funds NEW HEART MUSIC MINISTRIES

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Wong Family FoundationTX13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Wong Family Foundation · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · AbbVie Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Gao and Sons Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Gao and Sons Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Gao and Sons Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph