Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Galiotto Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$45k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$86kFood & Nutrition$64kAnimals$57kEnvironment$45kCrime & Legal$25kArts & Culture$24kPhilanthropy$11kRecreation & Sports$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$4,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$226k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FOOD LIFELINE$7,500
SEATTLE HUMANE SOCIETY$7,500
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$7,500
MARY'S PLACE$7,500
AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION$4,000
BRADY CENTER$3,000
LITTLE BIT THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER$3,000
WOMEN & CHILDREN'S FREE RESTAURANT & COMMUNITY KITCHEN (WCFR)$2,500
WASHINGTON TRAILS ASSOCIATION$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 94% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $4k → 17%MELANOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%MAKE-A-WISH OREGON: $4k → 12%MARY'S PLACE: $8k → 9%AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $4k → 17%MELANOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%MARY'S PLACE: $8k → 9%AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $4k → 17%CLIMATE REALITY PROJECT: $5k → 14%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $8k → 9%CLIMATE REALITY PROJECT: $3k → 14%CLIMATE SOLUTIONS: $5k → 9%CLIMATE REALITY PROJECT: $3k → 14%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $8k → 9%MARY'S PLACE: $4k → 9%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $4k → 9%CLIMATE SOLUTIONS: $3k → 9%BRADY CENTER: $4k → 14%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $4k → 9%BRADY CENTER: $4k → 14%CLIMATE SOLUTIONS: $3k → 9%BRADY CENTER: $3k → 14%SEATTLE HUMANE SOCIETY: $8k → 9%SEATTLE HUMANE SOCIETY: $8k → 9%SEATTLE HUMANE SOCIETY: $5k → 9%NORTHWEST HARVEST: $5k → 9%SEATTLE HUMANE SOCIETY: $5k → 9%NORTHWEST HARVEST: $5k → 9%SEATTLE HUMANE SOCIETY: $5k → 9%NORTHWEST HARVEST: $3k → 9%SEATTLE HUMANE SOCIETY: $5k → 9%NORTHWEST HARVEST: $3k → 9%SEATTLE HUMANE SOCIETY: $5k → 9%NORTHWEST HARVEST: $3k → 9%SEATTLE HUMANE SOCIETY: $4k → 9%NORTHWEST HARVEST: $3k → 9%SEATTLE HUMANE SOCIETY: $3k → 9%NORTHWEST HARVEST: $3k → 9%LITTLE BIT THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER: $3k → 9%CONSERVATION NORTHWEST: $3k → 9%FOOD LIFELINE: $8k → 9%FOOD LIFELINE: $8k → 9%FOOD LIFELINE: $5k → 9%FOOD LIFELINE: $5k → 9%FOOD LIFELINE: $4k → 9%FOOD LIFELINE: $4k → 9%SEATTLE TIMES FUND FOR THE NEEDY: $5k → 9%SEATTLE TIMES FUND FOR THE NEEDY: $4k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$336k · 22 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
1

Total granted

$336k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
+159%

Still filing today

82%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHealthEnvironmentRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TH
    THE HUMANE SOCIETY FOR SEATTLEKING COUNTY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $47k · revenue +13%
  • FL
    FOOD LIFELINE
    7× · 2019–2025 · $36k · revenue +39%
  • NH
    NORTHWEST HARVEST EMM
    7× · 2017–2023 · $25k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • WC
    Women & Children's Free Restaurant & Community Kitchengraduated
    one grant, 2025 · $3k · revenue +159%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Life Science Washington

Life science washington is a non-profit trade and professional association dedicated to promoting innovation and responsible growth in the life sciences and biomedical industries in the state of washington. promotion and education are…

2
Washington Bikes

Washington Bikes works to ensure that all who ride a bicycle in Washington have safe comfortable and convenient places to ride. Organization advocates for bicyclists rights and shapes policies.

Recreation & Sports
3
Washington Humane Society

The washington humane society protects animals, supports families, and advocates for positive change to create a world where all animals can thrive. we enrich the humanity of our communities by promoting compassion and encouraging people…

Animals
4
Feral Cat SpayNeuter Project

Our mission is to save the lives of homeless cats by providing access to high volume spay/neuter surgery in a safe and humane environment, collaborating with others and mentoring like-minded organizations to increase spay/neuter in their…

Animals
5
Friends of Seattle Waterfront

To bring people, communities, and resources together to ensure waterfront park thrives as a vibrant gathering space - uplifting locals, fostering connections and honoring seattle's natural beauty and stories.

Community Improvement
6
Washington Wild

Washington wild protects and restores wild lands and waters in washington state through advocacy, education and civic engagement.

Animals
7
Fsc I&P

Fsc i&p promotes environmentally appropriate, socially beneficial, and economically viable management of the world's forests. this mission aligns with the forest stewardship council (fsc), its network of offices, and other organizations.…

Philanthropy
8
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
9
Seattle Area Feline Rescue Fka Animal Talk Rescue

Safe rescue saves feline lives by taking in homeless cats, giving them the care they need, finding them loving homes, and supporting their human companions. we do this because we believe each cat has inherent value and that humans and…

Animals
10
Wildearth Guardians

Wildearth guardians works to protect and restore the wildlife, wild places, wild rivers, and health of the american west.

Unclassified
11
Disability Rights Washington

Disability rights washington's mission is to advance the dignity, equality, and self determination of people with disabilities. we work to pursue justice on matters related to human and legal rights.

Human Services
12
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Humane Society for Seattleking County and the most unlike its peers is Maris Place. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
18/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PLANNED PARENTHOOD — $33,500 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODBRADY CENTER — $25,000 · OtherBRADY CENTERNORTHWEST HARVEST EMM — $25,000 · OtherNORTHWEST HARVEST EMMCLIMATE SOLUTIONS — $17,500 · OtherCLIMATE SOLUTIONSWASHINGTON TRAILS ASSOCIATION — $10,500 · OtherWASHINGTON TRAILS ASSOCIATIONKARA — $7,500 · OtherMELANOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $6,000 · OtherTHE SEATTLE TIMES COMMUNITY IMPACT FUND — $10,500 · OtherTHE SEATTLE TIMES COMMUNITY IMPACT FUNDANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $9,500 · OtherANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE+3 more — $7,500 · OtherTHE HUMANE SOCIETY FOR SEATTLEKING COUNTY — $47,000 · AnimalsTHE HUMANE SOCIETY …Pets In Need — $7,000 · AnimalsPets In NeedHUMANE SOCIETY SILICON VALLEY — $3,000 · AnimalsFOOD LIFELINE — $36,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD LIFELIN…THE ALLIANCE FOR CLIMATE PROTECTION — $16,500 · EnvironmentTHE ALLIA…CONSERVATION NW — $11,000 · EnvironmentCONSERVAT…AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION — $16,500 · HealthMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF OREGON — $8,000 · HealthFred Hutchinson Cancer Center — $2,000 · HealthMaris Place — $24,000 · Youth DevelopmentLITTLE BIT THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER — $14,500 · Recreation & Sports
Other$152,500Animals$57,000Food & Nutrition$36,000Environment$27,500Health$26,500Youth Development$24,000Recreation & Sports$14,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE HUMANE SOCIETY FOR SEATTLEKING COUNTY — $47,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD LIFELINE — $36,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWEST HARVEST EMM — $25,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMaris Place — $24,000 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetCLIMATE SOLUTIONS — $17,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION — $16,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ALLIANCE FOR CLIMATE PROTECTION — $16,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLITTLE BIT THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER — $14,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetCONSERVATION NW — $11,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWASHINGTON TRAILS ASSOCIATION — $10,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $9,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF OREGON — $8,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetKARA — $7,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPets In Need — $7,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetMELANOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY SILICON VALLEY — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFred Hutchinson Cancer Center — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE HUMANE SOCIETY FOR SEATTLEKING COUNTY
  • Who funds FOOD LIFELINE
  • Who funds NORTHWEST HARVEST EMM
  • Who funds Maris Place
  • Who funds CLIMATE SOLUTIONS
  • Who funds AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION
  • Who funds THE ALLIANCE FOR CLIMATE PROTECTION
  • Who funds LITTLE BIT THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER
  • Who funds CONSERVATION NW
  • Who funds WASHINGTON TRAILS ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds THE SEATTLE TIMES COMMUNITY IMPACT FUND
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF OREGON
  • Who funds KARA
  • Who funds Pets In Need
  • Who funds MELANOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY SILICON VALLEY
  • Who funds Women & Children's Free Restaurant & Community Kitchen
  • Who funds Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN11.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Galiotto Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph