Skip to content
Gaddis Usrf (Utah Ski Racers) at a glance

· Private foundation

Gaddis Usrf (Utah Ski Racers)

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$94k
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Recreation & Sports$197kEducation$29kPhilanthropy$23kArts & Culture$21kHealth$8kEnvironment$5kHuman Services$4kFood & Nutrition$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k18 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $66k
$1,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$94k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DAVID ECCLES SCHOOL OF BUSINESS$20,100
YOUTH WINTER SPORTS ALLIANCE$17,300
UTAH ATHLETIC FOUNDATION$17,000
PARK CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$12,000
FRIENDS OF SKI MOUNTAIN MINING HIST$5,000
KPC W$3,000
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH ADVANCEMENT$2,500
UTAH GOLF FOUNDATION$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
ALF ENGEN SKI MUSEUM FOUNDTION$1,830
THE COUNTRY CLUB CARE FOUNDATION$1,500
SALT LAKE HONORARY COLONIES INC$1,500
BEACON OF HOPE$1,500
EGYPIAN THEATER$1,000
UTAH CLEAN ENERGY ALLIANCE INC$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%YMCA OF NORTHER UTAH: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
MT
WI
MI
OH
UT
CO
MD
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$189k · 18 repeat orgs$89k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
26

Total granted

$189k
$67k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+41%

Still filing today

50%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
Recreation & SportsArts & CultureEnvironmentHealthYouth DevelopmentInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YW
    YOUTH WINTER SPORTS ALLIANCE
    3× · 2022–2024 · $31k · revenue +106%
  • UF
    UTAH FOOD BANK
    2× · 2022–2024 · $1k · revenue +5%
  • MT
    MOUNTAIN TRAILS FOUNDATION
    2× · 2021–2023 · $550 · revenue +66%

Funded once

  • NA
    NATIONAL ABILITY CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $17k · revenue +3%
  • LP
    LIVE PARK CITY GIVE PARK CITY
    one grant, 2021 · $14k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SKI TEAM
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Utah Public Lands Alliance
Education
2
Utah Geological Foundation
—
3
Utah Sports Commission

The utah sports commission is governed by an all-volunteer board of trustees consisting of statewide sports, business, and community leaders, and was created to foster national and international sports competitions to be held in the state…

Community Improvement
4
Utah Ski and Snowboard Association Inc

Promote growth in the use of winter sports facilities in Utah.

—
5
Utah Sports Commission Foundation

The Utah Sports Commission Foundation is a charitable organization governed by an all-volunteer board of trustees consisting of statewide sports, business, and community leaders, and was created to foster national and international sports…

Recreation & Sports
6
Healthy Environment Alliance of Utah

Heal utah's mission is to protect utah's environment and its people by promoting clean air, clean energy, and comprehensive solutions to radioactive and toxic waste.

Environment
7
Utah Motorsports Foundation
Philanthropy
8
Summit Land Conservancy

Summit land conservancy works with utah communities to conserve land and water for the benefit of the people and nature.

Environment
9
Utah State Fair Corporation

The Utah State Fair Corporation was established to preserve Utah's heritage, meet tomorrow's future today, and showcase agriculture and innovative technology.

Recreation & Sports
10
Utah Outdoor Partners

Utah outdoor partners' mission is to raise awareness of the economic value of utah's open lands and to increase that value by working to support development of utah's outdoor recreation infrastructure.

Environment
11
Utah Open Lands Conservation Association Inc

Utah Open Lands' mission is to preserve and protect open space, in perpetuity, in order to maintain Utah's natural heritage and quality of life for present and future generations. The purpose of Utah Open Lands is to permanently protect…

Environment
12
The Community Foundation of Utah

We are utah's partner in philanthropy, pioneering innovation and collaboration to invest in our community today for a brighter tomorrow.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Ability Center; the most unlike its peers is National Jewish Health. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/28
Grantees still filing
14/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YOUTH SPORTS ALLIANCE PARK CITY: $51,500 · OtherYOUTH SPORTS ALLIANCE PARK CITYDAVID ECCLES SCHOOL OF BUSINESS: $22,600 · OtherDAVID ECCLES SCHOOL OF BUSINESSUNIVERSITY OF UTAH ATHLETICS DEPT: $17,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF UTAH ATHLETICS DEPTLIVE PARK CITY GIVE PARK CITY: $14,200 · OtherLIVE PARK CITY GIVE PARK CITYUNIVERSITY OF UTAH SKI TEAM: $10,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF UTAH SKI TEAM+36 more: $44,415 · Other+36 moreUTAH ATHLETIC FOUNDATION: $46,500 · Recreation & SportsUTAH ATHLETIC FOUNDATIONNATIONAL ABILITY CENTER: $16,900 · Recreation & SportsNATIONAL ABILITY CENTER+3 more: $2,000 · Recreation & SportsYOUTH WINTER SPORTS ALLIANCE: $30,550 · PhilanthropyYOUTH WINTER SPORTS …PARK CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $22,850 · PhilanthropyPARK CITY COMMUNITY …ALF ENGEN SKI MUSEUM FOUNDATION IN: $4,130 · Arts & CultureCommunity Wireless of Park City: $3,000 · Arts & CultureINTERNATIONAL SKIING HISTORY ASSOCIATION: $2,750 · Arts & CultureUTAH SYMPHONY & OPERA: $500 · Arts & CulturePARK CITY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $5,000 · EducationNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $2,500 · HealthHUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION: $1,000 · HealthUTAH CLEAN ENERGY ALLIANCE INC: $2,000 · EnvironmentMOUNTAIN TRAILS FOUNDATION: $550 · EnvironmentOGDEN VALLEY LAND TRUST INC: $500 · Environment
Other$159,715Recreation & Sports$65,400Philanthropy$53,400Arts & Culture$10,380Education$5,000Health$3,500Environment$3,050

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUTAH ATHLETIC FOUNDATION: $46,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetYOUTH WINTER SPORTS ALLIANCE: $30,550 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetPARK CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $22,850 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL ABILITY CENTER: $16,900 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPARK CITY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetALF ENGEN SKI MUSEUM FOUNDATION IN: $4,130 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCommunity Wireless of Park City: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL SKIING HISTORY ASSOCIATION: $2,750 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUTAH CLEAN ENERGY ALLIANCE INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUTAH GOLF FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetUTAH SPORTS HALL OF FAME FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetHAITIAN ORCHESTRA INSTITUTE INC: $1,300 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetHUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUTAH FOOD BANK: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF ALTA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetYoung Mens Christian Association Of Northern Utah: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSALT LAKE CLIMBERS ALLIANCE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMOUNTAIN TRAILS FOUNDATION: $550 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCITIZENS COMMITTEE TO SAVE OUR: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS UTAH INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOGDEN VALLEY LAND TRUST INC: $500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetUTAH SYMPHONY & OPERA: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSNOWBIRD SPORTS EDUCATION FOUNDATIO: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $425 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNTAIN JOURNAL INC: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UTAH ATHLETIC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH WINTER SPORTS ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds PARK CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ABILITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds PARK CITY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds ALF ENGEN SKI MUSEUM FOUNDATION IN ↗
  • Who funds Community Wireless of Park City ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL SKIING HISTORY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds UTAH CLEAN ENERGY ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds UTAH GOLF FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UTAH SPORTS HALL OF FAME FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HAITIAN ORCHESTRA INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds HUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UTAH FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF ALTA INC ↗
  • Who funds Young Mens Christian Association Of Northern Utah ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

George S and Dolores …Park City Community F…The Community Foundat…Mightycause Charitabl…PatagoniaorgWillard L Eccles Char…David Kelby Johnson M…Sad Foundation IncLarry H Miller and Ga…Sorenson Legacy Found…Thomas H and Carolyn …The Huntsman Foundati…
George S and Dolores Dore Eccles FoundationUT23.9× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: George S and Dolores Dore Eccles Foundation · Park City Community Foundation · The Community Foundation of Utah · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Patagoniaorg · Willard L Eccles Charitable Foundation · David Kelby Johnson Memorial Foundation · Sad Foundation Inc · Larry H Miller and Gail Miller Family Foundation · Sorenson Legacy Foundation · Thomas H and Carolyn L Fey Family Foundation · The Huntsman Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gaddis Usrf (Utah Ski Racers) funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gaddis Usrf (Utah Ski Racers). Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Gaddis Usrf (Utah Ski Racers)’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home