· Private foundation
Gaddis Usrf (Utah Ski Racers)
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k18 grants · $28k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $66k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DAVID ECCLES SCHOOL OF BUSINESS | $20,100 |
| YOUTH WINTER SPORTS ALLIANCE | $17,300 |
| UTAH ATHLETIC FOUNDATION | $17,000 |
| PARK CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $12,000 |
| FRIENDS OF SKI MOUNTAIN MINING HIST | $5,000 |
| KPC W | $3,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF UTAH ADVANCEMENT | $2,500 |
| UTAH GOLF FOUNDATION | $2,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
| ALF ENGEN SKI MUSEUM FOUNDTION | $1,830 |
| BEACON OF HOPE | $1,500 |
| THE COUNTRY CLUB CARE FOUNDATION | $1,500 |
| SALT LAKE HONORARY COLONIES INC | $1,500 |
| EGYPIAN THEATER | $1,000 |
| INTERNATIONAL SKIING HISTORY ASSOC | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
18 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- YWYOUTH WINTER SPORTS ALLIANCE3× · 2022–2024 · $31k · revenue +106%
- UCUTAH CLEAN ENERGY ALLIANCE INC2× · 2023–2024 · $2k · revenue +52%
- UFUTAH FOOD BANK2× · 2022–2024 · $1k · revenue +5%
Funded once
- NANATIONAL ABILITY CENTERone grant, 2023 · $17k · revenue +3%
- LPLIVE PARK CITY GIVE PARK CITYone grant, 2021 · $14k
- UOUNIVERSITY OF UTAH SKI TEAMone grant, 2022 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The utah sports commission is governed by an all-volunteer board of trustees consisting of statewide sports, business, and community leaders, and was created to foster national and international sports competitions to be held in the state…
Promote growth in the use of winter sports facilities in Utah.
The Utah Sports Commission Foundation is a charitable organization governed by an all-volunteer board of trustees consisting of statewide sports, business, and community leaders, and was created to foster national and international sports…
Heal utah's mission is to protect utah's environment and its people by promoting clean air, clean energy, and comprehensive solutions to radioactive and toxic waste.
Summit land conservancy works with utah communities to conserve land and water for the benefit of the people and nature.
The Utah State Fair Corporation was established to preserve Utah's heritage, meet tomorrow's future today, and showcase agriculture and innovative technology.
Utah outdoor partners' mission is to raise awareness of the economic value of utah's open lands and to increase that value by working to support development of utah's outdoor recreation infrastructure.
Utah Open Lands' mission is to preserve and protect open space, in perpetuity, in order to maintain Utah's natural heritage and quality of life for present and future generations. The purpose of Utah Open Lands is to permanently protect…
We are utah's partner in philanthropy, pioneering innovation and collaboration to invest in our community today for a brighter tomorrow.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Ability Center and the most unlike its peers is National Jewish Health. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UTAH ATHLETIC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds YOUTH WINTER SPORTS ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds PARK CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ABILITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds PARK CITY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds ALF ENGEN SKI MUSEUM FOUNDATION IN ↗
- Who funds Community Wireless of Park City ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL SKIING HISTORY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH ↗
- Who funds UTAH CLEAN ENERGY ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds UTAH GOLF FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UTAH SPORTS HALL OF FAME FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HAITIAN ORCHESTRA INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF ALTA INC ↗
- Who funds HUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Young Mens Christian Association Of Northern Utah ↗
- Who funds SALT LAKE CLIMBERS ALLIANCE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: George S and Dolores Dore Eccles Foundation · Park City Community Foundation · The Community Foundation of Utah · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Patagoniaorg · Willard L Eccles Charitable Foundation · David Kelby Johnson Memorial Foundation · Sad Foundation Inc · Larry H Miller and Gail Miller Family Foundation · Sorenson Legacy Foundation · Thomas H and Carolyn L Fey Family Foundation · The Huntsman Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Gaddis Usrf (Utah Ski Racers) funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.