Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Gaalema Family Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$6k
Granted FY2023
9
Grants FY2023
6
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202023.

Education$3kScience & Tech$2kCivil Rights$1kAnimals$1kRecreation & Sports$750Human Services$600Environment$500International$430Other$0
02FY2023 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$500
Median grant
6
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PAWS & HOOVES$1,000
LIBERTARIAN FUTURIST SOCIETY$1,000
KHAN ACADEMY$1,000
EASTSIDE TENNIS CENTER TOPS$500
TEXAS A&M FOUNDATION$500
PACIFIC SCIENCE CENTER$500
THE ARTIST BOAT$500
PURDUE FOR LIFE FOUNDATION$250
INTERNATIONAL JUGGLERS ASSOCIATION$250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 86% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%LIBERTARIAN FUTURIST SOCIETY: $1k → 8%GIVEWELL: $100 → 10%KIVA: $200 → 10%NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SCHOLARS: $100 → 17%UNIVERSITY OF AUSTIN: $1k → 10%THE ARTIST BOAT: $500 → 14%TEXAS A&M FOUNDATION: $500 → 22%FPF: $10 → 14%INTERNATIONAL JUGGLERS ASSOCIATION: $250 → 13%LIBERTAS INSTITUTE: $90 → 8%MARS SOCIETY: $1k → 7%SPACE FOUNDATION: $100 → 9%PURDUE FOR LIFE FOUNDATION: $250 → 19%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $80 → 9%ECHO LEAHY CENTER: $250 → 10%LIBERTARIAN FUTURIST SOCIETY: $60 → 8%KIVA: $100 → 10%MARS SOCIETY: $250 → 7%SPACE FOUNDATION: $50 → 9%HOPELINK REDMOND CENTER: $50 → 9%ECHO LEAHY CENTER: $150 → 10%KIVA: $30 → 10%PAWS & HOOVES: $1k → 9%EASTSIDE TENNIS CENTER TOPS: $500 → 9%ECHO LEAHY CENTER: $150 → 10%PAWS & HOOVES: $60 → 9%PACIFIC SCIENCE CENTER: $500 → 9%PAWS & HOOVES: $50 → 9%PACIFIC SCIENCE CENTER: $250 → 9%PACIFIC SCIENCE CENTER: $100 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
WA
NY
IN
CA
UT
CO
DC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$6k · 7 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2023, 3 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
7

Total granted

$6k
$1k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
+60%

Still filing today

71%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23
EducationScience & TechArts & CultureAnimalsPublic BenefitPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MS
    Mars Society Inc
    2× · 2020–2021 · $1k · revenue +15%
  • KA
    KHAN ACADEMY INC
    2× · 2020–2023 · $1k · revenue +48%
  • US
    United States Space Foundation
    2× · 2020–2022 · $150 · revenue +452%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF AUSTIN
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
  • TC
    THE CLEAR FUNDgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $100 · revenue +79%
  • NA
    NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SCHOLARS INC
    one grant, 2020 · $100 · revenue +20%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
National Academy of Sciences

The national academy of sciences was formed under a charter passed as an act of incorporation by the united states congress and signed into law on march 3, 1863. nas operates as a private membership organizationof distinguished scholars…

Science & Tech
2
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
3
Institute for the International Education of Students

The Institute for the International Education of Students (IES) blends the best elements of foreign higher education with American University requirements and encourages students to explore the unique elements of foreign countries.…

Education
4
Pew Research Center

Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan "fact tank" that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping America and the world. Pew Research Center generates a foundation of facts that enriches the public dialogue and…

Social Science
5
Discovery World Ltd

Discovery World educates, motivates,mobilizes and inspires the innovators and entrepreneurs of the 21st century. We connect innovation, science, and technology with exploration, environment, and our Great Lakes freshwater resources through…

Education
6
Theiss Research

The organization's mission is to provide a supportive environment in which scientists can perform and otherwise advance scientific research, for public dissemination and benefit, in areas including, but not limited to, the studies of the…

Science & Tech
7
Pitzer College

Pitzer College produces engaged socially responsible citizens of the world through an academically rigorous, interdisciplinary liberal arts education emphasizing social justice, intercultural understanding and environmental sensitivity.…

Education
8
National Academy of Engineering Fund

Naef supports the activities of the national academy of engineering (nae). nae operates within the charter and framework of the national academy of sciences (nas) and advises the federal government on matters of science and technology. nae…

Science & Tech
9
American Astronomical Society

The american astronomical society (aas), established in 1899, is the major organization of professional astronomers in north america. the basic objective of the aas is to promote the advancement of astronomy and closely related branches of…

Science & Tech
10
International Society for Arts Science and Technology Dba LeonardoISAST

The mission of the Organization is to identify new avenues to serve the art, science, and technology community. The Organization is recognized as a global leader in the interdisciplinary world of art, science, and technology. For over 50…

11
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

12
International Society of Automation

The international society of automation (isa) is a non-profit professional association founded in 1945 to create a better world through automation. isa empowers the global automation community through standards and knowledge sharing,…

Science & Tech

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United States Space Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Paws N Hooves. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
11/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LIBERTARIAN FUTURIST SOCIETY — $1,060 · OtherLIBERTARIAN FUTURIST SOCIETYUNIVERSITY OF AUSTIN — $1,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF AUSTINECHO LEAHY CENTER — $550 · OtherECHO LEAHY CENTEREASTSIDE TENNIS CENTER TOPS — $500 · OtherEASTSIDE TENNIS CENTER TOPSINTERNATIONAL JUGGLERS ASSOCIATION INC — $250 · OtherINTERNATIONAL JUGGLERS ASSOCIATION INC+5 more — $330 · Other+5 moreKHAN ACADEMY INC — $1,200 · EducationKHAN ACADEMY INCTexas A&M Foundation — $500 · EducationTexas A&M FoundationPurdue Research Foundation — $250 · EducationPurdue Research Foundatio…United States Space Foundation — $150 · EducationUnited States Space Found…NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SCHOLARS INC — $100 · EducationMars Society Inc — $1,250 · Science & TechMars Society I…Paws N Hooves — $1,110 · AnimalsPaws N Hoove…PACIFIC SCIENCE CENTER FOUNDATION — $850 · Arts & CulturePACIFIC S…THE ARTIST BOAT INC — $500 · EnvironmentKIVA MICROFUNDS — $330 · International
Other$3,690Education$2,200Science & Tech$1,250Animals$1,110Arts & Culture$850Environment$500International$330

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMars Society Inc — $1,250 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetKHAN ACADEMY INC — $1,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPaws N Hooves — $1,110 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetPACIFIC SCIENCE CENTER FOUNDATION — $850 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ARTIST BOAT INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTexas A&M Foundation — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIVA MICROFUNDS — $330 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL JUGGLERS ASSOCIATION INC — $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPurdue Research Foundation — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUnited States Space Foundation — $150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CLEAR FUND — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SCHOLARS INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLibertas Network — $90 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN8.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Gaalema Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph