· Private foundation
G4 Good Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k14 grants · $25k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $42k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DIVE4VETS FOUNDATION | $27,200 |
| ADAPTIVE SCUBA PROGRAMS (AQUANAUTS AND SCUBA FOR GOOD) | $14,400 |
| BARRIER FREE ADAPTIVE DIVE | $7,210 |
| THRESHER AQUATICS INC | $7,090 |
| ST JUDE CATHOLIC CHURCH | $2,550 |
| EPILEPSY ALLIANCE FOUNDATION | $2,450 |
| CAPTAINS FOR CLEAN WATER | $1,000 |
| THE FRANCES FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| BIG DOG FOUNDATION | $954 |
| BAHAMAS NATION TRUST FUND INC | $600 |
| OAPB FOUNDATION | $584 |
| PIPERS ANGELS ADAPTIVE DIVE | $500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $412 |
| AMERICAN DISABILITIES FOUNDATION | $350 |
| Individual grant recipient | $100 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–23, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +92% since the first grant, against +56% for the ones you funded once.
18 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- DFDIVE4VETS FOUNDATION INC3× · 2022–2024 · $66k
- CRCRISTO REY TAMPA HIGH SCHOOL AT MARY HELP OF CHRISTIANS INC2× · 2020–2021 · $32k
- TATHRESHER AQUATICS INC4× · 2021–2024 · $24k
Funded once
- CRCRISTO REY MIAMI HIGH SCHOOL INCgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $30k · revenue ×23
- DFDIVEHEART FOUNDATIONone grant, 2019 · $21k
- MTMCDOUGLE TECHNICAL INSTITUTEone grant, 2022 · $15k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide scuba instruction for veterans with ptsd. the weightlessness of scuba provides a peaceful respite from the pressures and trauma of military service. scuba for amputees provides a freedom of movement not experienced for years…
swimming and aquatic therapy for persons with special condition and foster families
Diving with a Purpose (DWP) We are dedicated to the conservation and protection of submerged heritage resources by providing education, training, certification and field experience to adults and youth in the fields of maritime archaeology…
The mission of Patriots For Disabled Divers (PFDD) is to provide to the physical, psycholocigal and social benefits of scuba diving to individuals living with cognitive and/or physical disabilities and their family members.
School
Mission is to help disabled veterans by giving them means to survive
Surf competition training for Paralympic athletes
Provide swimming safety to children with autism
Water safety and awareness
It is the nashville dolphins' mission to improve the health and quality of life for children and adults with special needs and combat the alarmingly high statistic of drowning deaths. the nashville dolphins provide adaptive aquatic lessons…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Leeds Foundation Pbc Inc and the most unlike its peers is For Elysa Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 11 years old; the field is 12. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 13% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CRISTO REY MIAMI HIGH SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds THRESHER AQUATICS INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CAREGIVING YOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds I CAN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE WILL TO LIVE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds VOLUNTEER FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LEEDS FOUNDATION PBC INC ↗
- Who funds LIFE WATERS ↗
- Who funds ADAPT-ABLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DIVE PIRATES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds CAPTAINS FOR CLEAN WATER INC ↗
- Who funds FOR ELYSA FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization G4 Good Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Volunteer Florida Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.