Skip to content
G R White Trust Xxxxx9003 at a glance

· Private foundation

G R White Trust Xxxxx9003

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
32
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$670k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$6.4MHealth$2.0MCrime & Legal$950kPublic Safety & Disaster$750kHuman Services$697kReligion$671kFood & Nutrition$382kAnimals$141kOther$0
02FY2025 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k19 grants · $448k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $645k
  • $250k+2 grants · $985k
$29,647
Median grant
1
States reached
$39M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Texas A&M Foundation$669,852
University of Texas Law School Foundatio$315,000
SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL FDN$160,000
Texas Tech University College of Agricul$130,000
Baylor Scott and White All Saints Health$113,674
ELM GROVE VOLUNTEER FIRE$81,545
Placid Community Volunteer Fire Departme$59,408
VISION HEIGHTS CHURCH$50,000
Parkland Health Foundation$50,000
Casa Care Inc$40,000
MCCULLOCH COUNTY JUNIOR LIVESTOC$35,500
ROCHELLE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT$35,000
VOCA VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT$34,450
Brady Volunteer Fire Department Inc$32,750
Mission Brady$30,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $613k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HUMAN RIGHTS INITIATIVE OF NORTH TEXAS I: $100k → 14%MARY LEE FOUNDATION: $25k → 10%HUMAN RIGHTS INITIATIVE OF NORTH TEXAS I: $65k → 14%HUMAN RIGHTS INITIATIVE OF NORTH TEXAS I: $26k → 14%COMMUNITY PARTNERS OF DALLAS: $5k → 14%MISSION BRADY: $45k → 19%Casa Care Inc: $40k → 19%Mission Brady: $30k → 19%Casa Care Inc: $30k → 19%Mission Brady: $30k → 19%MISSION BRADY: $25k → 19%MCCULLOCH COUNTY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $25k → 19%MCCULLOCH COUNTY RESOURCE CENTER: $25k → 19%The Family Shelter of McCulloch County: $20k → 19%MISSION BRADY: $20k → 19%MCCULLOCH COUNTY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $20k → 19%MCCULLOCH COUNTY RESOURCE CENTER: $20k → 19%Family Shelter of McCulloch County: $17k → 19%Family Shelter of McCulloch County: $17k → 19%MISSION BRADY: $15k → 19%The Family Shelter of McCulloch County: $13k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$15M · 52 repeat orgs$373k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

52 repeat relationships: 26 still active in FY2025, 26 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

52
19

Total granted

$15M
$293k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+10%

Still filing today

37%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $80k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHealthYouth DevelopmentPublic Safety & DisasterArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    Texas A&M Foundation
    6× · 2020–2025 · $4.7M · revenue +54%
  • SM
    SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL FOUNDATION
    4× · 2022–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +131%
  • BH
    Baylor Health Care System Foundation
    4× · 2020–2023 · $663k · revenue +139%

Funded once

  • US
    UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER
    one grant, 2020 · $40k
  • RB
    ROCHELLE BAPTIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $35k
  • RS
    ROCHELLE STUDY CLUB FBO ROCHELLE
    one grant, 2020 · $32k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
North Central Texas Medical Foundation
Health
2
Center for 20TH Century Texas Studies
—
3
Texas Foster Care & Adoption Serv

A state of texas licensed foster care and adoption agency that identifies and provides approved healing foster homes for children.

Human Services
4
Texas Trust Gives
Philanthropy
5
Shelter Agencies for Families in East Texas

To provide shelter to abused families.

Human Services
6
Texans for Lawsuit Reform Foundation
Philanthropy
7
Baylor University Medical Center

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
8
Texas Battered Women's Center Inc

Provide care, assistance, and counseling for abused women. Provide food for needy families.

Human Services
9
Matador Motley County Volunteer Fire Department

Fire fighting and prevention

Public Safety & Disaster
10
Big Horn County Memorial Hospital Auxiliary
Health
11
Baylor Scott & White Medical Centers - Greater North Texas

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
12
Texas Flying Legends Museum
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The University of Texas Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Family Shelter of Mcculloch Co. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 77 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

8
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
18/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY: $1,100,000 · OtherTEXAS TECH UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SCHOOL OF LAW: $875,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SCHOOL OF LAWST STEPHENS EPISCOPAL SCHOOL: $725,775 · OtherST STEPHENS EPISCOPAL SCHOOLVOCA VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $293,710 · OtherROCHELLE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $288,677 · OtherTexas Tech University College of Agricul: $280,000 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC: $259,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $235,546 · Other+47 more: $2,658,488 · Other+47 moreTexas A&M Foundation: $4,683,870 · EducationTexas A&M FoundationSOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $1,205,000 · EducationSOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL FOUNDATIONThe University of Texas Law School Foundation: $375,000 · EducationThe University of Texas Law School Foundation+1 more: $136,885 · EducationBaylor Health Care System Foundation: $662,870 · HealthPARKLAND FOUNDATION: $217,000 · Health+1 more: $10,000 · HealthHUMAN RIGHTS INITIATIVE OF NORTH TEXAS INC: $191,400 · Human ServicesTHE MISSION AT BRADY: $165,000 · Human ServicesMCCULLOCH COUNTY RESOURCE CENT: $90,000 · Human ServicesCASA CARE INC: $70,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY SHELTER OF MCCULLOCH CO: $66,283 · Human ServicesMARY LEE FOUNDATION: $25,000 · Human Services+1 more: $5,000 · Human ServicesRIVERBEND RETREAT CENTER: $150,000 · ReligionPLACID COMMUNITY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $74,073 · Public Safety & DisasterMELVIN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $26,500 · Public Safety & DisasterLOHN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $14,555 · Public Safety & DisasterFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $60,000 · Youth DevelopmentBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS LONE STAR: $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentBRADY YOUTH SPORTS FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentMCCULLOCH COUNTY HISTORICAL THEATER SOCIETY INC: $42,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$6,716,696Education$6,400,755Health$889,870Human Services$612,683Religion$150,000Public Safety & Disaster$115,128Youth Development$90,000Arts & Culture$42,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTexas A&M Foundation: $4,683,870 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetSOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $1,205,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetBaylor Health Care System Foundation: $662,870 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetThe University of Texas Law School Foundation: $375,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC: $259,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetPARKLAND FOUNDATION: $217,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS INITIATIVE OF NORTH TEXAS INC: $191,400 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetTHE MISSION AT BRADY: $165,000 over 6y, 83% of budgetRIVERBEND RETREAT CENTER: $150,000 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetMCCULLOCH COUNTY LIBRARY ASSOCIATION INC: $136,885 over 6y, 68% of budgetMCCULLOCH COUNTY RESOURCE CENT: $90,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetHEART OF TEXAS HISTORICAL MUSE: $81,550 over 6y, 68% of budgetPLACID COMMUNITY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $74,073 over 2y, 48% of budgetCASA CARE INC: $70,000 over 2y, 70% of budgetFAMILY SHELTER OF MCCULLOCH CO: $66,283 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $60,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMCCULLOCH COUNTY HISTORICAL THEATER SOCIETY INC: $42,000 over 2y, 25% of budgetMELVIN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $26,500 over 1y, 68% of budgetBLUEBONNET CASA INC: $25,000 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetMARY LEE FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS LONE STAR: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLOHN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $14,555 over 1y, 27% of budgetDIOCESAN MIGRANT & REFUGEE SERVICES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMETHODIST JUSTICE MINISTRY OF FUMC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Texas A&M Foundation ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Baylor Health Care System Foundation ↗
  • Who funds The University of Texas Law School Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PARKLAND FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS INITIATIVE OF NORTH TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MISSION AT BRADY ↗
  • Who funds RIVERBEND RETREAT CENTER ↗
  • Who funds MCCULLOCH COUNTY LIBRARY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MCCULLOCH COUNTY RESOURCE CENT ↗
  • Who funds HEART OF TEXAS HISTORICAL MUSE ↗
  • Who funds PLACID COMMUNITY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds CASA CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY SHELTER OF MCCULLOCH CO ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Texas Instruments Fou…The Covia FoundationCommunities Foundatio…Shell USA Company Fou…Raymond James Charita…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…The Blackbaud Giving …Vanguard Charitable E…National Philanthropi…American Endowment Fo…Natl Christian Charit…American Online Givin…
Texas Instruments FoundationTX16.1× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Texas Instruments Foundation · The Covia Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Shell USA Company Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization G R White Trust Xxxxx9003 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from G R White Trust Xxxxx9003. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 77 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on G R White Trust Xxxxx9003’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home