Skip to content

· Private foundation

G & G Family Fndn Inc-Agy-Main

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$103k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Education$802kHuman Services$354kReligion$110kArts & Culture$101kRecreation & Sports$100kYouth Development$81kPhilanthropy$30k
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $58k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GOOD FELLOWS$30,000
COVENANT DAY SCHOOL$15,000
CAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST$12,500
YOUTH COMMISSION INTERNATIONAL$9,000
SEARCH MINISTRIES$6,500
CENTRAL CHURCH OF GOD$5,000
NEW CITY CHURCH$5,000
CHARLOTTE RESCUE MISSION$5,000
JANE'S FUND$5,000
WITH OPEN EYE'S FOUNDATION$5,000
FAITH HOPE & LOVE MENTORING PROGRAM$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–22, $358k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%YMCA OF GREATER CHARLOTTE: $168k → 10%YMCA OF GREATER CHARLOTTE: $167k → 10%Greater Enrichment Program Inc: $2k → 10%Greater Enrichment Program Inc: $2k → 10%ALEXANDER YOUTH NETWORK: $5k → 10%ALEXANDER YOUTH NETWORK: $5k → 10%ALEXANDER YOUTH NETWORK: $5k → 10%ALEXANDER YOUTH NETWORK: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 8 repeat orgs$317k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +65% since the first grant, against +1% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
8

Total granted

$1.4M
$228k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+65%
+1%

Still filing today

88%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 14% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $89k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationPhilanthropyInternationalReligionYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Davidson College
    3× · 2018–2024 · $790k · revenue +52%
  • YC
    YOUTH COMMISSION INTERNATIONAL INC
    4× · 2020–2025 · $69k · revenue +74%
  • AY
    ALEXANDER YOUTH NETWORK
    4× · 2018–2022 · $20k · revenue +65%

Funded once

  • MO
    MOMENTS OF HOPE CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $100k
  • FO
    FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES
    one grant, 2024 · $75k · revenue +1%
  • TG
    THE GOOD FELLOWS CLUB INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +27%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Charlotte Christian School

Charlotte christian school is a christ-centered, college preparatory school, equipping and developing students to effectively integrate biblical truth and learning nto their daily lives and to impact the culture for christ.

—
2
Greenville College

Greenville college d/b/a greenville university empowers students for lives of character and service through a transforming christ-centered education in the liberal arts, sciences, and professional studies.

Education
3
Greensboro College

Greensboro College provides a liberal arts education grounded in the traditions of the United Methodist Church and fosters the intellectual, social, and spiritual development of all students while supporting their individual needs.

Education
4
Greater Greensboro Youth for Christ Inc

Yfc reaches young people everywhere, working together with the local church and other likeminded partners to raise up lifelong followers of jesus who lead by their godliness in lifestyle, devotion to the word of god and prayer, passion for…

Youth Development
5
Youth for Christ Inc Fayetteville Area

Yfc reaches young people everywhere, working together with the local church and other likeminded partners to raise up lifelong followers of jesus who lead by their godliness in lifestyle, devotion to the word of god and prayer, passion for…

Youth Development
6
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
7
George Fox University

George fox university, a christ centered community, prepares students spiritually, academically, and professionally to think with clarity, act with integrity, and serve with passion.

Education
8
Charlotte Country Day School

Through excellence in education, charlotte country day school develops the potential of each student by fostering intellectual curiosity, principled character, ethical leadership and a responsibility to serve. the key values and…

Education
9
York College of Pennsylvania

York college prepares graduates for fulfilling, productive, and purposeful lives by providing high quality programs of study supported by relevant real-world experiences. continued on schedule o.as a rich and diverse community of educators…

Education
10
For Charlotte Inc

To unite the Church to transform the city through the power of the Gospel.

Religion
11
Youth for Christ International Ministries

As part of the body of christ, to see that every young person in every people group in every nation has the opportunity to make an informed decision to be a follower of jesus christ and become a part of the local church.

Religion
12
Youth for Christ of Northwest Ohio Inc

Reaches young people everywhere, working with the local church and other like-minded partners to raise up life long followers of jesus who lead by their godliness in lifestyle, devotion to the work of god, prayer, passion for sharing the…

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Foundation for the Carolinas; the most unlike its peers is Greater Enrichment Program Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Davidson College: $790,000 · EducationDavidson College+1 more: $1,500 · EducationYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER CHARLOTTE: $334,333 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN AS…ALEXANDER YOUTH NETWORK: $20,000 · Human ServicesALEXANDER YOUTH NETWORK+1 more: $6,000 · Human ServicesMOMENTS OF HOPE CHURCH: $100,000 · OtherMOMENTS OF HOPE CHURC…Billy Graham Evangelistic: $100,000 · OtherBilly Graham Evangeli…GOOD FELLOWS: $30,000 · OtherGOOD FELLOWSCOVENANT DAY SCHOOL: $15,000 · OtherYOUTH COMMISSION INTERNATINAL INC: $15,000 · OtherCAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST: $12,500 · OtherWITH OPEN EYES FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · Other+8 more: $38,000 · Other+8 moreFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $75,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUTH COMMISSION INTERNATIONAL INC: $69,000 · ReligionUNITED WAY OF GREATER CHARLOTTE INC: $28,000 · PhilanthropyJANES FUND: $5,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $1,000 · PhilanthropyTHE GOOD FELLOWS CLUB INC: $25,000 · Recreation & Sports
Education$791,500Human Services$360,333Other$325,500Youth Development$75,000Religion$69,000Philanthropy$34,000Recreation & Sports$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDavidson College: $790,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER CHARLOTTE: $334,333 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $75,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH COMMISSION INTERNATIONAL INC: $69,000 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER CHARLOTTE INC: $28,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GOOD FELLOWS CLUB INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetALEXANDER YOUTH NETWORK: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWITH OPEN EYES FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetGreater Enrichment Program Inc: $6,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCHARLOTTE RESCUE MISSION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetQueens University of Charlotte: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR THE CAROLINAS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Davidson College ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER CHARLOTTE ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH COMMISSION INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER CHARLOTTE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GOOD FELLOWS CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds ALEXANDER YOUTH NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds WITH OPEN EYES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Greater Enrichment Program Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHARLOTTE RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds JANES FUND ↗
  • Who funds Queens University of Charlotte ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR THE CAROLINAS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Foundation for the CarolinasNC15.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Foundation for the Carolinas · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization G & G Family Fndn Inc-Agy-Main funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from G & G Family Fndn Inc-Agy-Main. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to G & G Family Fndn Inc-Agy-Main?

    Find your warmest path to G & G Family Fndn Inc-Agy-Main through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on G & G Family Fndn Inc-Agy-Main’s filings →

    More from the funding graph