· Private foundation
Further Forward Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $5k
- $10k–50k12 grants · $208k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CRODODILE RIVER MUSIC | $100,000 |
| BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY | $37,000 |
| FIVESPARKS | $25,000 |
| BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY | $25,000 |
| FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN-BOSTON | $20,000 |
| OASIS OF PEACE | $18,000 |
| BOSTON MINERAL CLUB | $18,000 |
| SOMERVILLE HOMELESS COALITION | $15,000 |
| RURAL AMERICA INITIATIVE | $10,000 |
| CENTRE STREET FOOD PANTRY | $10,000 |
| THE HAWK MOUNTAIN SANCTUARY | $10,000 |
| LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY | $10,000 |
| CAMBRIDGE COMMUNITY CENTER | $10,000 |
| THE WILEY NETWORK | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $188k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +78% since the first grant, against +35% for the ones you funded once.
22 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $75k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
CROCODILE RIVER MUSIC INC3× · 2023–2025 · $240k · revenue +20%- ACAFRICAN COMMUNITY EDUCATION PROGRAM INC2× · 2021–2022 · $140k · revenue +2%
JEWISH VOCATIONAL SERVICE INC4× · 2017–2020 · $120k · revenue +104%
Funded once
- HUHEBREW UNION COLLEGE-JEWISH INSTITUTE OF RELIGIONone grant, 2019 · $100k
- MGMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATEDone grant, 2019 · $42k
BALTIMORE MUSEUM OF ARTgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +57%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.
Our mission is to ensure that the people of greater boston benefit from a vibrant, resilient, and inclusive waterfront, harbor, and islands; these spaces are equitable, accessible, and adapted to climate change; and to ensure our public,…
Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…
Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.
Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…
To cultivate and develop an expansive collection of trees, gardens, and plants for all to explore, enjoy and study; and to provide through education and stewardship, a greener, healthier, more beautiful environment.
Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…
Education and Research
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Boston Food Bank Inc and the most unlike its peers is Baltimore Museum of Art. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 16% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CROCODILE RIVER MUSIC INC ↗
- Who funds AFRICAN COMMUNITY EDUCATION PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH VOCATIONAL SERVICE INC ↗
- Who funds LEO BAECK INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds FRACTURED ATLAS INC ↗
- Who funds THE GROUNDTRUTH PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds WHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART ↗
- Who funds MAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger ↗
- Who funds HAWK MOUNTAIN SANCTUARY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds NASHUA RIVER WATERSHED ASSOC INC ↗
- Who funds THE WILY NETWORK ↗
- Who funds BALTIMORE MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds WORCESTER COUNTY FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds ALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INC ↗
- Who funds The Open Pantry of Greater Lowell Inc ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - BOSTON INC ↗
- Who funds HIAS INC ↗
- Who funds HARVARD CULTURAL COLLABORATIVE ↗
- Who funds THE FAMILY PANTRY OF CAPE COD CORP ↗
- Who funds SKIDMORE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds THE DRAWING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds SOMERVILLE HOMELESS COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds EAGLE HILL FOUNDATION OF MASSACHUSETTSINC ↗
- Who funds RURAL AMERICA INITIATIVES ↗
- Who funds Native American Heritage Association ↗
- Who funds THE JEWISH FOUNDATION FOR THE RIGHTEOUS INC ↗
- Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds NATIVE PLANT TRUST INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Boston Foundation Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Rockland Trust Charitable Foundation Inc · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Liberty Mutual Foundation Inc · Analog Devices Foundation · Fidelity Foundation · Wellington Management Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Bushrod H Campbell & Adah F Hall Charity Fund · Cambridge Savings Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Further Forward Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Hias Inc — 88% of income from government
- Nashua River Watershed Assoc Inc — 54% of income from government
- Jewish Vocational Service Inc — 39% of income from government
- Somerville Homeless Coalition Inc — 31% of income from government
- Xerces Society Inc — 22% of income from government
- Greater Boston Food Bank Inc — 22% of income from government
- Brandeis University — 9% of income from government
- Cambridge Community Center Inc — 8% of income from government
- Friends of the Children - Boston Inc — 4% of income from government
- Baltimore Museum of Art — 4% of income from government
- Native Plant Trust Inc — 3% of income from government
- Harvard Cultural Collaborative — 3% of income from government
- Boston Center for the Arts Inc — 1% of income from government
- Cotuit Center for the Arts Inc — 1% of income from government
- Worcester County Food Bank Inc — 1% of income from government
- Crocodile River Music Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.