· Public charity
Wellington Management Foundation
To support best-in-class programs and organizations in our communities that improve the education and educational opportunities for under-resourced youth.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 75 grants below total $4,930,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $7,020,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $2,090,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| City Year Inc | $200,000 |
| Boston Debate league | $200,000 |
| Duet Inc | $100,000 |
| The Institute for Nonprofit practice | $100,000 |
| Bottom Line | $100,000 |
| Council for Economic Education | $90,000 |
| Apex for Youth | $60,000 |
| Alexander Twilight Academy | $60,000 |
| First Graduate | $60,000 |
| WriteBoston Inc | $60,000 |
| Junior Achievement of Greater Boston | $60,000 |
| Cristo Rey Boston High School | $60,000 |
| Open Door Arts | $60,000 |
| Enroot Inc | $60,000 |
| Conservatory Lab Charter School | $60,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $6.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 79% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Grants abroad, by region — $2.0M on the FY2024 return
Schedule F, as filed: 3 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: THE WELLINGTON MANAGEMENT UK FOUNDATION PROVIDES PHILANTHROPIC GRANTS TO SUPPORT PROGRAMS AND ORGANIZATIONS IN COMMUNITIES THAT IMPROVE THE EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES FOR ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED YOUTH THROUGHOUT THE UNITED KINGDOM AND EUROPE.
Stated purpose: Enrich is the leading Hong Kong charity promoting the economic empowerment of migrant domestic workers. The organization provides interactive workshops and activities on weekends and public holidays in native languages of domestic workers, equipping them with skills, knowledge and confidence to escape debt, plan for their future and achieve their goals. Enrich is impartial and does not sell or promote any financial products as part of their programs in order to create a safe, trusted learning environment. · Aidha aims to break the poverty cycle by providing a curriculum to low income women, many of whom have left their home countries, that helps them develop practical skills in money management in order to empower and ensure their financial independence. · AUTISM PARTNERSHIP FOUNDATION (APF), A REGISTERED CHARITY BODY (QUALIFIED FOR THE EXEMPTION FROM TAX SECTION 88 OF THE INLAND REVENUE) IN HONG KONG, IS COMMITTED TO MAKING A DIFFERENCE IN THE LIFE OF INDIVIDUALS WITH AUTISM. THROUGH VARIOUS FUNDRAISING INITIATIVES, APF AIMS TO RAISE FUNDS TO GENERATE PUBLIC AWARENESS AND KNOWLEDGE ABOUT AUTISM. APF WILL ALSO ADVOCATE ABA TREATMENT AND INTERVENTION THROUGH COMMUNITY PROGRAMS OF EDUCATION AND RESEARCH AND PROVIDE SUPPORT AND HELP FOR CHILDREN WITH ASD AND THEIR FAMILIES IN ASIA. APF'S MISSION IS TO SUPPORT PEOPLE WITH ASD, THEIR FAMILIES AND ALL THOSE INVOLVED TO THRIVE FOR REALIZING ASD PEOPLE'S INHERENT POTENTIAL AND ACHIEVING THE GREATEST DEGREE OF INDEPENDENCE AND HIGHEST QUALITY OF LIFE POSSIBLE.
Stated purpose: JESSIE'S CENTRE, THE JUNE CALLWOOD CENTRE FOR YOUNG WOMEN, FOCUSES ON THE EDUCATIONAL ADVANCEMENT OF YOUNG MOTHERS AND PREGNANT TEENS AGED 12 TO 21, BY HELPING THEM COMPLETE HIGH SCHOOL, APPLY TO POST-SECONDARY EDUCATION, RECEIVE SCHOLARSHIPS FOR POST-SECONDARY EDUCATION, AND PROVIDE TRAINING PROGRAMS THAT LEAD DIRECTLY INTO THE JOB MARKET. IN ADDITION TO EDUCATION, JESSIE'S OFFERS SOCIAL SERVICES AND HEALTH RESOURCES NEEDED TO HELP YOUNG MOTHERS/PREGNANT TEENS BECOME STABLE PARENTS. A TYPICAL DAY IN JESSIE'S ON-SITE HIGH SCHOOL PROGRAM INCLUDES A FULL DAY OF CLASS FOR THE YOUNG MOTHERS/PREGNANT TEENS, DAYCARE FOR THE CHILDREN WHILE THE PARENTING WOMEN ARE IN CLASS, ALL MEALS ARE COOKED ONSITE AND PROVIDED FOR THE CHILDREN AND YOUNG MOTHERS/PREGNANT TEENS WHEN IN DAYCARE AND CLASS, RESPECTIVELY. IN A TYPICAL DAY, THERE IS ALSO ACCESS TO COUNSELLING, SOCIAL SERVICES, AND HEALTH CARE SERVICES, WITH A DOCTOR AND NURSE PRACTITIONER ON-SITE WEEKLY.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +67% since the first grant, against +38% for the ones you funded once.
115 repeat relationships — 75 still active in FY2024, 40 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
CITY YEAR INC7× · 2017–2024 · $1.5M · revenue +15%- BABOSTON AFTER SCHOOL & BEYOND INC3× · 2017–2021 · $1.3M · revenue +208%
- BGBREAKTHROUGH GREATER BOSTON INC5× · 2017–2022 · $1.0M · revenue +37% · 26% of their budget
Funded once
- NVNEIGHBORHOOD VILLAGES INCone grant, 2022 · $700k · revenue +20%
UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $560k · revenue +74%
EMPOWER SCHOOLS INCone grant, 2021 · $250k · revenue +6%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
New england law/boston dedicates itself to preparing students to be successful lawyers and leaders in the public and private sectors through integrated practical, theoretical and ethical education of the highest caliber and to contributing…
Bpe drives exceptional outcomes for all students by developing great teachers and great schools. for three decades, bpe (formerly the boston plan for excellence) has devised solutions to the toughest challenges faced by boston's students…
Massachusetts education and career opportunities, inc. (massedco, inc.) is a statewide network of service sites that provides education and career advising to over 12,000 low-income, first generation individuals each year. massedco…
Bpe's mission is to drive exceptional outcomes for all students by developing great teachers and great schools. for three decades, bpe (formerly the boston plan for excellence) has devised solutions to the toughest challenges faced by…
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
The international school of boston (isb) is an independent, non-profit, preschool-12 french-english bilingual and international school located in cambridge, massachusetts, in one of the most vibrant metropolitan areas in the united states.…
By creating supportive relationships between students and volunteer mentors, boston partners in education ensures a more equitable city where every bps student is equipped with the skills, opportunity, and confidence to succeed in the…
Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…
The massachusetts business alliance for education (mbae) is committed to excellence, opportunity and innovation in our public education system to prepare all students to engage successfully in a global economy and society.
Junior achievement of southern massachusetts is part of the world's largest organization dedicated to giving young people the knowledge and skill they need to own their economic success, plan for their future, and make smart academic and…
The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Empower Schools Inc and the most unlike its peers is Blessed Stephen Bellesini Osa Academy Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
138 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 138 of the 142 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CITY YEAR INC ↗
- Who funds YEAR UP INC ↗
- Who funds BOSTON AFTER SCHOOL & BEYOND INC ↗
- Who funds BREAKTHROUGH GREATER BOSTON INC ↗
- Who funds THE BOTTOM LINE INC ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE FOR NONPROFIT PRACTICE INC ↗
- Who funds THRIVE SCHOLARS ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF EXCEL ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOLS INC ↗
- Who funds 10000 DEGREES ↗
- Who funds LITERATIONS CORP ↗
- Who funds THE SPORTSMEN'S TENNIS & ENRICHMENT CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ARTISTS FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
- Who funds LEAP for Education Inc ↗
- Who funds America Scores New England DBA Boston Scores ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - BOSTON INC ↗
- Who funds GENERATION CITIZEN INC ↗
- Who funds SILVER LINING MENTORING INC ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD VILLAGES INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY NURTURING CENTER OF MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗
- Who funds SOCIAL INNOVATION FORUM INC ↗
- Who funds BOSTON COLLEGIATE CHARTER SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Youth Guidance ↗
- Who funds JEREMIAH PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds THIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC ↗
- Who funds PHILADELPHIA ACADEMIES INC ↗
- Who funds PARENTCHILD INC ↗
- Who funds ESPERANZA ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds LET'S GET READY INC ↗
- Who funds IMMIGRANT FAMILY SERVICES INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF WORCESTER ↗
- Who funds ELLIS EARLY LEARNING INC ↗
- Who funds Episcopal Academy ↗
- Who funds DOC WAYNE INC ↗
- Who funds SOCIEDAD LATINA INC ↗
- Who funds AIM HIGH FOR HIGH SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds PREPARATORY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds RAW ART WORKS INC ↗
- Who funds BUSINESSES UNITED IN INVESTING LENDING & DEVELOPMENT ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Liberty Mutual Foundation Inc · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Boston Foundation Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Bushrod H Campbell & Adah F Hall Charity Fund · United Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc · Riley Mabel Louise Tr Uwill · William E Schrafft and Bertha E Schrafft Charitable Trust · Rockland Trust Charitable Foundation Inc · Amelia Peabody Foundation · The Cabot Family Charitable Trust · Richard & Susan Smith Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Wellington Management Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Hyde Square Task Force Inc — 52% of income from government
- East Boston Social Centers Inc — 50% of income from government
- Nurtury Inc — 49% of income from government
- Utec Inc — 46% of income from government
- Acre Family Child Care Inc — 45% of income from government
- Jewish Vocational Service Inc — 39% of income from government
- The Young People's Project Inc — 39% of income from government
- Boston Chinatown Neighborhood Center Inc — 38% of income from government
- Brookview House Inc — 34% of income from government
- Neighborhood Villages Inc — 33% of income from government
- America Scores New England Dba Boston Scores — 30% of income from government
- College for Social Innovation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Girls Incorporated of Boston and Lynn — 28% of income from government
- Ywca of Southeastern Massachusetts Inc — 28% of income from government
- Boys & Girls Club of Greater Lowell Inc — 27% of income from government
- Fathers Uplift Incorporated — 22% of income from government
- Up Education Network — 22% of income from government
- Horizons for Homeless Children — 21% of income from government
- Ellis Early Learning Inc — 20% of income from government
- Level Ground Mixed Martial Arts Inc — 19% of income from government
- He Is Me Institute Inc — 16% of income from government
- Kids in Tech Inc — 15% of income from government
- Sociedad Latina Inc — 15% of income from government
- Boston After School & Beyond Inc — 15% of income from government
- Doc Wayne Inc — 15% of income from government
- Chica Inc — 12% of income from government
- La Vida Inc — 11% of income from government
- Teensharp — 11% of income from government
- City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
- Action for Boston Community Development Inc — 11% of income from government
- Tech Goes Home Incorporated — 10% of income from government
- Silver Lining Mentoring Inc — 10% of income from government
- Families First Parenting Program Inc — 10% of income from government
- Leap for Education Inc — 9% of income from government
- Boston Debate League Incorporated — 7% of income from government
- Raw Art Works Inc — 7% of income from government
- Ymca of the North Shore Inc — 6% of income from government
- Evkids Inc — 4% of income from government
- Friends of the Children - Boston Inc — 4% of income from government
- Youth Development Organization Inc — 4% of income from government
- Third Sector New England Inc — 3% of income from government
- 826 Boston Inc — 3% of income from government
- Girls Incorporated of Worcester — 2% of income from government
- Breakthrough Greater Boston Inc — 2% of income from government
- Artists for Humanity Inc — 2% of income from government
- Conservatory Lab Foundation Inc — 1% of income from government
- Beacon Academy Inc — 1% of income from government
- Edvestors Inc — 1% of income from government
- The Bottom Line Inc — 0% of income from government
- Year Up Inc — 0% of income from government
- The Epiphany School Inc — 0% of income from government
- Steppingstone Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Boston Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.