Skip to content

· Private foundation

Fund for Education

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$82k
Granted FY2025still arriving
36
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$22k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

International$224kEducation$104kHealth$101kHuman Services$66kEnvironment$58kArts & Culture$50kFood & Nutrition$35kCivil Rights$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 36 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k34 grants · $50k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $32k
$500
Median grant
11
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RESCUE TASK FORCE$21,800
SHARING EXCESS$10,000
JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF GR PHILA$8,000
ARDEN THEATRE COMPANY$5,000
BEREA COLLEGE$5,000
ALTRUVISION$5,000
WILLS EYE FOUNDATION$5,000
NEW ISRAEL FUND STANDING TOGETHER$4,000
THE TIBET FUND$3,000
RECONSTRUCTING JUDAISM$3,000
NURSE FAMILY PARTNERSHIP$1,000
LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS$1,000
FISTULA FOUNDATION$1,000
MID PINES FOUNDATION$1,000
OCCIDENTAL COLLEGE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MID PINES FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%CENTER FOR CIVILIANS IN CONFLICT: $1k → 14%CENTER FOR CIVILIANS IN CONFLICT: $1k → 14%CENTER FOR CIVILIANS IN CONFLICT: $1k → 14%CENTER FOR CIVILIANS IN CONFLICT: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
MA
IA
PA
RI
CA
CO
KY
VA
AZ
NC
SC
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$628k · 54 repeat orgs$24k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

54 repeat relationships: 28 still active in FY2025, 26 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

54
17

Total granted

$628k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+20%

Still filing today

65%
65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalArts & CultureEducationHealthEnvironmentFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LC
    LIFE CHARITIES INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $156k · revenue +5%
  • TS
    THE STUDENT CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC
    6× · 2018–2023 · $43k · revenue +15%
  • AT
    ARDEN THEATRE COMPANY
    5× · 2021–2025 · $25k · revenue +75%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • IE
    ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue +1%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue -45%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
2
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
3
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
4
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
5
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
6
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
7
American Flood Coalition Inc

To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.

Environment
8
International Life Sciences Institute

Ilsi is a global, nonprofit federation dedicated to generating and advancing emerging science and groundbreaking research to ensure foods are safe, nutritious and sustainable, and that they improve planetary and human health and well-being…

Science & Tech
9
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
10
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
11
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
12
American Foreign Service Association

American foreign service association (afsa) is both the principal advocate for the long-term institutional wellbeing of the professional career foreign service and responsible for safeguarding the interest of afsa members. (continued on…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Environmental Defense Fund Incorporated; the most unlike its peers is Lower Merion Conservancy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

55 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 55 of the 81 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
53/55
Grantees still filing
35/55
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL: $47,000 · OtherHARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOLTHE STUDENT CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC: $43,000 · OtherTHE STUDENT CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INCJEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES: $42,000 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICESJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF GR PHILA: $22,000 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF GR P…ARDEN THEATRE CO: $16,000 · OtherARDEN THEATRE COFRIENDSHIP INTERNATIONAL: $11,000 · Other+40 more: $81,335 · Other+40 moreLIFE CHARITIES INC: $156,326 · PhilanthropyLIFE CHARITIES INCBEREA COLLEGE: $35,000 · EducationBEREA COLLEGEOCCIDENTAL COLLEGE: $22,500 · EducationOCCIDENTAL COLLEG…BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY: $20,000 · EducationBRANDEIS UNIVERSI…WILLS EYE FOUNDATION INC: $12,500 · EducationWILLS EYE FOUNDAT…FIRST BOOK: $7,000 · EducationFIRST BOOKKIPP FOUNDATION: $4,500 · Education+2 more: $2,250 · EducationTibet Fund Inc: $16,500 · InternationalASHOKA: $13,000 · InternationalOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $7,350 · InternationalWORLD EMERGENCY RELIEF: $4,000 · InternationalMAP International Inc: $3,750 · InternationalISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $2,500 · International+4 more: $3,250 · InternationalSHARING EXCESS: $19,500 · Food & NutritionPhilabundance: $8,575 · Food & NutritionFeeding America: $6,500 · Food & NutritionALTRUVISION: $10,000 · HealthNURSE-FAMILY PARTNERSHIP: $9,300 · HealthThe Fistula Foundation: $9,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $3,500 · HealthVOLUNTEER MEDICAL SERV CORPS OF LM & NAR: $1,550 · HealthARDEN THEATRE COMPANY: $25,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL YIDDISH BOOK CENTER INC: $3,250 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $2,500 · Arts & Culture+5 more: $2,100 · Arts & Culture
Other$262,335Philanthropy$156,326Education$103,750International$50,350Food & Nutrition$34,575Health$33,350Arts & Culture$32,850

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLIFE CHARITIES INC: $156,326 over 8y, 3.4% of budgetTHE STUDENT CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC: $43,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBEREA COLLEGE: $35,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetARDEN THEATRE COMPANY: $25,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetOCCIDENTAL COLLEGE: $22,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBRANDEIS UNIVERSITY: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSHARING EXCESS: $19,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTibet Fund Inc: $16,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetASHOKA: $13,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWILLS EYE FOUNDATION INC: $12,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDSHIP INTERNATIONAL: $11,000 over 3y, 4.2% of budgetALTRUVISION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNURSE-FAMILY PARTNERSHIP: $9,300 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetThe Fistula Foundation: $9,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPhilabundance: $8,575 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $7,350 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFIRST BOOK: $7,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $6,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEO WILSON BIODIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetKIPP FOUNDATION: $4,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR CIVILIANS IN CONFLICT: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD EMERGENCY RELIEF: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMAP International Inc: $3,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL YIDDISH BOOK CENTER INC: $3,250 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Conservation Experience: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS INC: $2,885 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MERION FIRE COMPANY: $1,850 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND: $1,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetVOLUNTEER MEDICAL SERV CORPS OF LM & NAR: $1,550 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $1,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetARDMORE FREE LIBRARY: $1,150 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMID PINES FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetFINCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWHYY INC: $650 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS EDUCATION FUND: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMON CAUSE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALUMNI ASSOCIATION OF THE BRONX HIGH SCHOOL OF SCIENCE: $500 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetNARBERTH COMMUNITY THEATRE: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE BARNES FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LIFE CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE STUDENT CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BEREA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds ARDEN THEATRE COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds OCCIDENTAL COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds SHARING EXCESS ↗
  • Who funds Tibet Fund Inc ↗
  • Who funds ASHOKA ↗
  • Who funds WILLS EYE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDSHIP INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds ALTRUVISION ↗
  • Who funds NURSE-FAMILY PARTNERSHIP ↗
  • Who funds The Fistula Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Philabundance ↗
  • Who funds OXFAM-AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds FIRST BOOK ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds EO WILSON BIODIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KIPP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR CIVILIANS IN CONFLICT ↗
  • Who funds WORLD EMERGENCY RELIEF ↗
  • Who funds MAP International Inc ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL YIDDISH BOOK CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds American Conservation Experience ↗
  • Who funds LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Foundation for Improving HorizonsDE17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Foundation for Improving Horizons · The Philadelphia Foundation · The William Penn Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fund for Education funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fund for Education. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Brandeis University: 9% of income from government
  • National Yiddish Book Center Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Oxfam-America Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Fund for Education?

Find your warmest path to Fund for Education through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 81 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Fund for Education’s filings →

More from the funding graph