Skip to content
Friends of Humanity Internatio at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Friends of Humanity Internatio

Friends of Humanity International a humanitarian organization led by volunteers guide by charter and the fundamental principle of hleping humanity at-large medical, relief, education and socail support

$600k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$28k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$236kHousing & Shelter$38kReligion$36kHuman Services$33kFood & Nutrition$11kHealth$6k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $44,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $599,964 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $555,464 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $28k
$6,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$199k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MEDGLOBAL INC$28,000
ICB$6,000
I-CARE FUND AMER$5,500
MIAMI RESCUE MIS$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HELPING HANDS: $15k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Grants abroad, by region: $481k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

South Asia$481k · 100% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: DIS/GEN

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$179k · 5 repeat orgs$72k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
8

Total granted

$179k
$72k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+11%

Still filing today

80%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHousing & ShelterHealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MI
    MedGlobal Inc
    2× · 2023–2024 · $90k · revenue +103%
  • IF
    ISLAMIC FOUNDATION OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC
    3× · 2017–2023 · $20k · revenue +26%
  • NC
    NUR CENTER INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $18k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • SU
    SUNRISE USA INC
    one grant, 2017 · $18k · revenue -18%
  • HH
    HELPING HAND FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT INC
    one grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue +11%
  • IR
    ISLAMIC RELIEF USA
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +8%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Islamic Ummah Relief Corp

Develop long-term developmental projects aimed at providing a sustainable living for poor communities as well as supporting needy widows and orphans

Human Services
2
Us Help Inc

We are a non-profit charity organization that humbly aims to provide to those in need around the world. With gratitude & love, we try to provide food, water, clothing, shelter, peace & education to needy persons, families and communities.

Human Services
3
Muslim Aid America

Provide help to people who are victims of natural disasters or conflicts or suffering from poverty, hunger, disease, illiteracy, discrimination, homelessness, debt, unemployment, injustice, or lack of skills or economic opportunity.

Public Safety & Disaster
4
Muslim Response Usa for Relief and Development

To provide material and financial assistance to relieve the sufferings of any and all persons affected by disasters. conflicts, disease. and hunger, irrespective of race. creed or ethnicity. To support schools and other learning centers…

International
5
Humanitarian African Relief Organization

To help africans in need. our main focus is getting food, shelter, clothing and medicine to the needy

International
6
Resources and Aid Mobilization Foundation

RAM Resources and Aid Mobilization Foundation exists to attain resources and use them to help women children and the untouchables of Pakistan to lead a higher quality of life. We provide legal aid by fighting cases for the poor and…

Religion
7
Bangladesh American Society of Muslim Aid for Huma
Philanthropy
8
Rehmat Foundation
Philanthropy
9
One Ummah Foundation in Memory of Mustafa Saeed Rahman

To break the cycle of poverty in the developing world, in particular Southeast Asia, the Indian Subcontinent, and parts of Africa. This is accomplished by promoting education, especially that of women, nutritional support, and removing…

Education
10
Sudan Aid 911 Emergency Relief Incorporated

To provide support (food, medical and shelter) for victims and refugees escaping or trapped in the war zone in sudan and currently residing in egypt or sudan. most of these refugees are women and children. we will also support them…

International
11
Relieve Humanity International Inc

Relieve poverty

International
12
International Institute of Islamic Thought the Fairfax Institute
Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Helping Hand for Relief and Development Inc; the most unlike its peers is Us-India Policy Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

I-CARE FUND AMERICA INC: $109,020 · InternationalI-CARE FUND AMERICA INCSUNRISE USA INC: $17,661 · InternationalSUNRISE USA INCISLAMIC RELIEF USA: $10,000 · InternationalISLAMIC RELIEF USAOBAT HELPERS INC: $5,000 · InternationalMedGlobal Inc: $89,637 · HealthMedGlobal IncMiami Rescue Mission Inc: $37,989 · Housing & ShelterMiami Rescue Miss…NUR CENTER INC: $18,036 · Housing & ShelterNUR CENTER INCISLAMIC FOUNDATION OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $20,045 · OtherISLAMIC FOUNDA…ISLAMIC CENTER OF BROWARD INC: $13,500 · OtherISLAMIC CENTER…MUSLIM STUDENT: $7,810 · OtherMUSLIM STUDENTSOUTH FL MUSLIM: $5,000 · OtherSOUTH FL MUSLI…HELPING HAND FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT INC: $15,100 · Human ServicesCHILDLIFE FOUNDATION AMERICA I: $6,000 · PhilanthropyUS-INDIA POLICY INSTITUTE: $5,000 · Arts & Culture
International$141,681Health$89,637Housing & Shelter$56,025Other$46,355Human Services$15,100Philanthropy$6,000Arts & Culture$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetI-CARE FUND AMERICA INC: $109,020 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetMedGlobal Inc: $89,637 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMiami Rescue Mission Inc: $37,989 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetISLAMIC FOUNDATION OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $20,045 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetNUR CENTER INC: $18,036 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetSUNRISE USA INC: $17,661 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetHELPING HAND FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT INC: $15,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetISLAMIC RELIEF USA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDLIFE FOUNDATION AMERICA I: $6,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetOBAT HELPERS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Network for GoodNational Philanthropi…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Network for GoodDC7.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Friends of Humanity Internatio funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Friends of Humanity Internatio. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    5get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Friends of Humanity Internatio?

    Find your warmest path to Friends of Humanity Internatio through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Friends of Humanity Internatio’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home