Loading…
· Public charity
Friends of Humanity Internatio
To help those in need
$600k
Granted FY2024
4
Grants
3
Communities
$28k
Largest
01What you fund
0187% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
International$142kHealth$90kHousing & Shelter$56kHuman Services$15kPhilanthropy$6kArts & Culture$5kOther$46k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2018
medicalchildren
2020
education
2021
shelterfood
2022
women
2023
medglobalhumanitarianvulnerable aroundcritical healthhealthcaremedicalchildren
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 4 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k3 grants · $17k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $28k
$6,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$199k
Total assets
Largest grants
- MEDGLOBAL INC$28,000
- ICB$6,000
- I-CARE FUND AMER$5,500
- MIAMI RESCUE MIS$5,000
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8% — the area typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
80%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$288k · 6 repeat orgs$72k to everyone else
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +81% since the first grant, against +40% for the ones you funded once.
6 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
6
8
Total granted
$288k
$72k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+81%
+40%
Still filing today
83%
75%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
InternationalHousing & ShelterHealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- IFI-CARE FUND AMER3× · 2022–2024 · $109k · revenue +81%
- MIMEDGLOBAL INC2× · 2023–2024 · $90k · revenue +8403%
- IFISFSF FOOD PANTR3× · 2017–2023 · $20k · revenue +26%
Funded once
- SSSYRIAN SUNRISE Fone grant, 2017 · $18k · revenue -18%
- HHHELPING HANDSgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue +40%
- IRISLAMIC RELIEFone grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +2%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Indian Muslim Relief and Charities
Help India's muslims and minorities achieve security, freedom, equality and their rights as citizens of India
Human Services
2
Islamic Ummah Relief Corp
Islamic Ummah Relief IUR is a NONProfit Organisation which embarks on humanitarian and relief activities in the United States Ghana Nigeria Niger Uganda and still growing to reach other countirers We develop longterm developmental projects…
Human Services
3
Darushifa Healthcare Inc
We help underprivileged men, women and children in the United States and in developing countries such as Pakistan, and we support domestic and international healthcare for those in need.
Health
4
International Humanitarian Relief
To provide full educational and learning opportuintes to displaced refugees. ihr-usa operates 7 learning centers that teachchildren basic math, english and science classes. in addition we help in their everyday lives such as food, shelter…
International
5
Humanitarian African Relief Organization
Emergency relief services
International
6
Hamdard Humanitarian Relief in
Humanitarian relief providing essentials, medicine, food, grocery,construction related assistance to the needy people specially widows and orphans.
International
7
India Development and Relief Fund Inc
Provide social development and relief assistance to underprivileged people primarily in india but also in nepal, sri lanka and the usa
International
8
Resources and Aid Mobilization Foundation
RAM Resources and Aid Mobilization Foundation exists to attain resources and use them to help women children and the untouchables of Pakistan to lead a higher quality of life. We provide legal aid by fighting cases for the poor and…
Religion
9
Rahma Worldwide Aid and Development
Rahma delivers emergency and development programs to needy communities, without discrimination based on gender, race, religion, or location. we aim to empower and develop individuals and communities affected by hardship globally.
International
10
Aseel Foundation
Provide urgent humanitarian assistance Empower the most disadvantaged global artisans
Community Improvement
11
Sudan Aid 911 Emergency Relief
To provide support (food, medical and shelter) for victims and refugees escaping or trapped in the war zone in sudan and currently residing in egypt or sudan. most of these refugees are women and children. we will also support them…
International
12
International Aid Services - Usa Inc
Provide for human transformation, beyond relief and development, in the world's most desperate communities.
—
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is I-Care Fund America Inc and the most unlike its peers is Childlife Foundation America I. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
11 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
International$141,681Health$89,637Housing & Shelter$56,025Other$46,355Human Services$15,100Philanthropy$6,000Arts & Culture$5,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Yaqub Family FoundationDE13.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Yaqub Family Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation Friends of Humanity Internatio funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: NUR CENTER INC.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~25 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 7 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
7 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.5× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 273037015 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on NUR CENTER INC, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 25 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 3% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Friends of Humanity Internatio?
Find your warmest path to Friends of Humanity Internatio through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines