Skip to content
Freygish Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Freygish Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$502k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Health$1.3MInternational$444kYouth Development$353kHuman Services$275kFood & Nutrition$221kPublic Benefit$177kEducation$162kCrime & Legal$130kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $162k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $335k
$15,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$3.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BRIDGING VOICE INC$150,000
BLUE STAR FAMILIES$75,000
CAMPAIGN AGAINST HUNGER$60,000
CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC$50,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$30,000
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION INC$25,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
PRISON RENAISSANCE$15,000
A FAIR SHAKE FOR YOUTH$15,000
CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT DOCUMENTARY$12,000
NORWICH DOLLARS FOR SCHOLARS$10,000
HORIZONS NEWARK INC$10,000
TRANS LIFELINE$10,000
COMPUTER SERVICES FOR THE BLIND$10,000
HEALARIOUS$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $555k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THIRD OPTION FOUNDATION: $25k → 6%THIRD OPTION FOUNDATION: $25k → 6%CAMPAIGN AGAINST HUNGER: $60k → 20%CAMPAIGN AGAINST HUNGER: $50k → 20%CAMPAIGN AGAINST HUNGER: $50k → 20%CAMPAIGN AGAINST HUNGER: $50k → 20%RED HOOK INITIATIVE: $100k → 20%RED HOOK INITIATIVE: $50k → 20%RED HOOK INITIATIVE: $50k → 20%RED HOOK INITIATIVE: $25k → 20%COMPUTER SERVICES FOR THE BLIND: $10k → 20%HOT BREAD KITCHEN LTD: $25k → 17%HOT BREAD KITCHEN LTD: $20k → 17%HOT BREAD KITCHEN LTD: $10k → 17%HOT BREAD KITCHEN LTD: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NH
WA
MI
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CA
CO
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NC
SC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.4M · 18 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +48% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
45

Total granted

$2.4M
$1.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+8%

Still filing today

83%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $72k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BV
    BRIDGING VOICE INC
    5× · 2019–2025 · $524k · revenue +100% · 33% of their budget
  • SO
    Spirit of America Worldwide
    4× · 2019–2024 · $230k · revenue +245%
  • TC
    THE CAMPAIGN AGAINST HUNGER INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $210k · revenue +48%

Funded once

  • CS
    COMPUTER SCIENCES FOR THE BLIND INC
    one grant, 2019 · $150k
  • GI
    GRACE INTERNATIONAL INC - BED-STUY CAMPAIGN AGAINS
    one grant, 2019 · $125k
  • RP
    REACH PROJECT INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue ×15
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
City Report Inc

CITY REPORT, INC. serves the people of New York through independent journalism that answers their information needs and holds the powerful to account.

Arts & Culture
2
The Israel Innovation Fund Inc

Our vision is to reignite the zionist spirit and meet the needs of jewish civilization in the twenty-first century by connecting people around the world through the vibrancy and creativity of contemporary israeli culture.

Arts & Culture
3
Upturn Inc

Upturn advances equity and justice in the design, governance, and use of technology.

—
4
Fund for Guaranteed Income

Fund for Guaranteed Income ("F4GI") supports the research, infrastructure, and implementation of guaranteed income initiatives, including Compton Pledge, Long Beach Pledge, and Chicago Future Fund.

Human Services
5
Fund for Global Human Rights Inc

We are activists and grant-makers working in solidarity with individuals and organizations promoting human rights in their communities. by investing in those on the frontlines of human rights struggles, we help build stronger, more…

International
6
Search for Change Inc

Dedicated to improving the quality of life and increasing the self sufficiency of individuals with emotional, social and economic barriers. this is accomplished by providing direct support and assistance needed to enable individuals to…

Human Services
7
Advocacy Institute Inc

Advocacy institute supports social justice organizations to build the advocacy skills, knowledge and power they need to shape government policy for a more just and equitable new york.

Civil Rights
8
Center for Humane Technology

Center for Humane Technology is a nonprofit dedicated to ensuring that the most consequential technologies actually serve humanity. We bring clarity to how the tech ecosystem works in order to shift the incentives that drive it.

Science & Tech
9
Open Transformation Lab Inc

The missions is to provide information and resources to counter disinformation, propaganda, and offer a window to trusted content about the events that are going on in the Middle East.

Science & Tech
10
Israel Team Advocates International Inc

Promote understanding and support for the people of israel

International
11
Federal Defenders of New York Inc

The organization provides representation and related defense services to indigent persons charged with federal crimes.

Crime & Legal
12
Economic Hardship Reporting Project

Ehrp supports independent journalists to create high quality stories about economic inequity. we then place those stories in mainstream media, mobilizing readers to fight systems perpetuating economic injustice.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Humanity Forward Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Peak Rescue Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

45 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 45 of the 70 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
42/45
Grantees still filing
24/45
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BRIDGING VOICE INC: $524,200 · HealthBRIDGING VOICE INCCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $227,000 · HealthCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INCTHE RICK HERREMA FOUNDATION INC: $150,000 · HealthTHE RICK HERREMA FOUNDATION INCREACH PROJECT INC: $100,000 · HealthREACH PROJECT INC+4 more: $41,000 · HealthCOMPUTER SCIENCES FOR THE BLIND INC: $150,000 · OtherCOMPUTER SCIENCES FOR THE BLIND INCGRACE INTERNATIONAL INC - BED-STUY CAMPAIGN AGAINS: $125,000 · OtherGRACE INTERNATIONAL INC - BED-STUY CA…Individual grant recipient: $115,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $95,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODCONNECTED WARRIOR FOUNDATION: $75,000 · OtherCONNECTED WARRIOR FOUNDATIONGRACE INTERNATIONAL INC: $61,700 · OtherGRACE INTERNATIONAL INCJOIN FREEWORLD INC: $50,000 · OtherPRISON RENAISSANCE: $40,000 · OtherVOTEORG: $50,000 · Other+36 more: $385,264 · Other+36 moreRED HOOK INITIATIVE: $225,000 · Human ServicesRED HOOK INITIATI…THE CAMPAIGN AGAINST HUNGER INC: $210,000 · Human ServicesTHE CAMPAIGN AGAI…HOT BREAD KITCHEN LTD: $60,000 · Human ServicesHOT BREAD KITCHEN…THIRD OPTION FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Human ServicesTHIRD OPTION FOUN…+1 more: $10,000 · Human ServicesSpirit of America Worldwide: $230,000 · International+1 more: $5,000 · InternationalBLUE STAR FAMILIES INC: $160,000 · Public BenefitCODE FOR AMERICA LABS INC: $66,666 · Public BenefitA Fair Shake for Youth Inc: $125,040 · Youth DevelopmentHORIZONS NEWARK INC: $35,000 · Youth Development+1 more: $3,000 · Youth DevelopmentDONORSCHOOSEORG: $100,000 · EducationTHE ATLANTICIST SUPPORT FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Education826NYC Inc: $10,000 · EducationREADING PARTNERS: $5,500 · Education+1 more: $1,000 · Education
Health$1,042,200Other$1,146,964Human Services$555,000International$235,000Public Benefit$226,666Youth Development$163,040Education$126,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBRIDGING VOICE INC: $524,200 over 5y, 33% of budgetSpirit of America Worldwide: $230,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $227,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetRED HOOK INITIATIVE: $225,000 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetTHE CAMPAIGN AGAINST HUNGER INC: $210,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetBLUE STAR FAMILIES INC: $160,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHE RICK HERREMA FOUNDATION INC: $150,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetA Fair Shake for Youth Inc: $125,040 over 6y, 21% of budgetREACH PROJECT INC: $100,000 over 1y, 24% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCODE FOR AMERICA LABS INC: $66,666 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHOT BREAD KITCHEN LTD: $60,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetTHIRD OPTION FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetVOTEORG: $50,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetHORIZONS NEWARK INC: $35,000 over 5y, 4.7% of budgetAMERICAN YOUTH TABLE TENNIS ORGINC: $35,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetTHE ANDREW GOODMAN FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $22,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANITY FORWARD FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetGrind for Life Inc: $17,500 over 2y, 13% of budgetHEAD STRONG PROJECT INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT DOCUMENTARY INC: $12,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOOKING FOR COMMUNITY: $11,000 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetISRAEL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC: $11,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFUND FOR THE CITY OF NEW YORK INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ATLANTICIST SUPPORT FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 59% of budgetSAFE PASSAGE PROJECT CORPORATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget826NYC Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetNAZARETH HOUSING INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTranslifeline DBA Trans Lifeline: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetREADING PARTNERS: $5,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCoalition Against Trafficking In Women: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetFLORENCE IMMIGRANT & REFUGEE RIGHTS PROJECT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWorker Justice Center of New York Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE SOLA FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFIRST DESCENTS: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBADGE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetUNION THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundCommunity Foundation …The New York Communit…Associated Jewish Cha…Amalgamated Charitabl…The Goldman Sachs Cha…Silicon Valley Commun…National Philanthropi…Gs Donor Advised Phil…Morgan Stanley Global…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…The Bank of America C…
Jewish Communal FundNY16× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Community Foundation of New Jersey · The New York Community Trust · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Freygish Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Freygish Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • The Center for Independent Documentary Inc: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Freygish Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Freygish Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 70 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Freygish’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home