· Private foundation
Freygish Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $5k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $162k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $335k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BRIDGING VOICE INC | $150,000 |
| BLUE STAR FAMILIES | $75,000 |
| CAMPAIGN AGAINST HUNGER | $60,000 |
| CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC | $50,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD | $30,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $25,000 |
| ESSENTIAL INFORMATION INC | $25,000 |
| PRISON RENAISSANCE | $15,000 |
| A FAIR SHAKE FOR YOUTH | $15,000 |
| CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT DOCUMENTARY | $12,000 |
| HORIZONS NEWARK INC | $10,000 |
| TRANS LIFELINE | $10,000 |
| NORWICH DOLLARS FOR SCHOLARS | $10,000 |
| COMPUTER SERVICES FOR THE BLIND | $10,000 |
| HEALARIOUS | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $555k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +48% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.
18 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $72k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BVBRIDGING VOICE INC5× · 2019–2025 · $524k · revenue +100% · 33% of their budget
- SOSpirit of America Worldwide4× · 2019–2024 · $230k · revenue +245%
- TCTHE CAMPAIGN AGAINST HUNGER INC4× · 2022–2025 · $210k · revenue +48%
Funded once
- CSCOMPUTER SCIENCES FOR THE BLIND INCone grant, 2019 · $150k
- GIGRACE INTERNATIONAL INC - BED-STUY CAMPAIGN AGAINSone grant, 2019 · $125k
- RPREACH PROJECT INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue ×15
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
CITY REPORT, INC. serves the people of New York through independent journalism that answers their information needs and holds the powerful to account.
Our vision is to reignite the zionist spirit and meet the needs of jewish civilization in the twenty-first century by connecting people around the world through the vibrancy and creativity of contemporary israeli culture.
Upturn advances equity and justice in the design, governance, and use of technology.
Fund for Guaranteed Income ("F4GI") supports the research, infrastructure, and implementation of guaranteed income initiatives, including Compton Pledge, Long Beach Pledge, and Chicago Future Fund.
We are activists and grant-makers working in solidarity with individuals and organizations promoting human rights in their communities. by investing in those on the frontlines of human rights struggles, we help build stronger, more…
Dedicated to improving the quality of life and increasing the self sufficiency of individuals with emotional, social and economic barriers. this is accomplished by providing direct support and assistance needed to enable individuals to…
Advocacy institute supports social justice organizations to build the advocacy skills, knowledge and power they need to shape government policy for a more just and equitable new york.
Center for Humane Technology is a nonprofit dedicated to ensuring that the most consequential technologies actually serve humanity. We bring clarity to how the tech ecosystem works in order to shift the incentives that drive it.
The missions is to provide information and resources to counter disinformation, propaganda, and offer a window to trusted content about the events that are going on in the Middle East.
Promote understanding and support for the people of israel
The organization provides representation and related defense services to indigent persons charged with federal crimes.
Ehrp supports independent journalists to create high quality stories about economic inequity. we then place those stories in mainstream media, mobilizing readers to fight systems perpetuating economic injustice.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Humanity Forward Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Peak Rescue Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 17 years old; the field is 18. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
45 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 45 of the 70 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BRIDGING VOICE INC ↗
- Who funds Spirit of America Worldwide ↗
- Who funds CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds RED HOOK INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds THE CAMPAIGN AGAINST HUNGER INC ↗
- Who funds BLUE STAR FAMILIES INC ↗
- Who funds THE RICK HERREMA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds A Fair Shake for Youth Inc ↗
- Who funds REACH PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds DONORSCHOOSEORG ↗
- Who funds CODE FOR AMERICA LABS INC ↗
- Who funds HOT BREAD KITCHEN LTD ↗
- Who funds THIRD OPTION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JOIN FREEWORLD INC ↗
- Who funds VOTEORG ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN YOUTH TABLE TENNIS ORGINC ↗
- Who funds HORIZONS NEWARK INC ↗
- Who funds THE ANDREW GOODMAN FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ESSENTIAL INFORMATION INC ↗
- Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
- Who funds HUMANITY FORWARD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Grind for Life Inc ↗
- Who funds PEAK RESCUE INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds HEAD STRONG PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT DOCUMENTARY INC ↗
- Who funds COOKING FOR COMMUNITY ↗
- Who funds ISRAEL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds COMPUTER SERVICES FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
- Who funds THE ATLANTICIST SUPPORT FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Community Foundation of New Jersey · The New York Community Trust · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Freygish Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Center for Independent Documentary Inc — 6% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Freygish Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Freygish Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.