Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Freidenrich Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$125k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$2.0MHuman Services$508kEducation$503kYouth Development$301kPhilanthropy$172kArts & Culture$162kRecreation & Sports$100kFood & Nutrition$60kOther$0
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$100,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EPACENTER ARTS$100,000
San Mateo County Historical Association$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $508k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%PENINSULA VOLUNTEERS: $2k → 7%Avenidas: $105k → 8%Avenidas: $101k → 8%AVENIDAS: $100k → 8%Avenidas: $100k → 8%AVENIDAS: $100k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.1M · 11 repeat orgs$543k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +3% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

11 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
12

Total granted

$3.1M
$518k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
0%

Still filing today

64%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHealthHuman ServicesEnvironmentPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • E
    EPACENTER
    4× · 2021–2025 · $275k · revenue +248%
  • TP
    THE PALO ALTO COMMUNITY FUND
    7× · 2017–2024 · $151k · revenue +275%
  • MF
    Marwen Foundation Inc
    3× · 2017–2019 · $75k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • PC
    POSITIVE COACHING ALLIANCE
    one grant, 2024 · $250k · revenue 0%
  • KS
    KENT SCHOOL
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue -4%
  • CC
    COACHING CORPS
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue -42%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
President-Board of Trustees Santa Clara College

Scu is a catholic and jesuit institution that makes student learning its central focus, promotes faculty and staff learning in its various forms, and exhibits organizational learning.

Education
2
Presidio Hill School

Presidio hill school is a co-ed k-8 independent, progressive school. learning is collaborative and an active experience with an emphasis on inquiry. students are engaged in their own learning and guided by an expert faculty through a…

Education
3
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

4
Marin Academy

Marin academy asks every individual to think, question, and create in an environment of encouragement and compassion, and challenges each person to accept the responsibilities posed by education in a democratic society.

Education
5
Community Foundation Santa Cruz County

To promote philanthropy to make santa cruz county a better place to live, now and in the future.we bring together people, ideas, and resources to inspire philanthropy and accomplish great things.

Philanthropy
6
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
7
Pacific University

A diverse and sustainable learning community dedicated to discovery and excellence in teaching, scholarship and practice, pacific university inspires students to think, care, create and pursue justice in our world.

Education
8
Public Advocates Inc

For more than five decades, public advocates has challenged the systemic causes of poverty and racial discrimination by strengthening community voices in public policy and achieving tangible legal victories advancing education, housing,…

9
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education
10
Pitzer College

Pitzer College produces engaged socially responsible citizens of the world through an academically rigorous, interdisciplinary liberal arts education emphasizing social justice, intercultural understanding and environmental sensitivity.…

Education
11
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…

Education
12
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Epacenter and the most unlike its peers is Grace Science Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
10/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BAY AREA CANCER CONNECTIONS — $1,525,000 · HealthBAY AREA CANCER CONNECTIONS+1 more — $5,000 · HealthRavenswood Family Health Center — $400,000 · OtherRavenswood Family Hea…COACHING CORPS — $100,000 · OtherCOACHING CORPSSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK — $60,000 · OtherSECOND HARVEST FOOD B…Planned Parenthood — $52,500 · OtherPlanned ParenthoodSAN MATEO COUNTY HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION — $25,000 · OtherAchieve Foundation — $25,000 · Other+4 more — $45,950 · Other+4 moreAVENIDAS — $506,000 · Human ServicesAVENIDAS+1 more — $1,500 · Human ServicesPOSITIVE COACHING ALLIANCE — $250,000 · EducationPOSITIVE COACH…THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $135,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF T…KENT SCHOOL — $100,000 · EducationKENT SCHOOL+1 more — $12,500 · EducationEPACENTER — $275,000 · Arts & CultureEPACENTERMarwen Foundation Inc — $75,000 · Arts & CultureMarwen Foun…KQED INC — $42,000 · Arts & CultureKQED INCTHE PALO ALTO COMMUNITY FUND — $151,000 · PhilanthropyPHILANTHROPIC VENTURES FOUNDATION — $20,000 · Philanthropy+1 more — $1,000 · PhilanthropyThe Silicon Valley Leadership Group Foundation — $5,000 · EnvironmentPENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST — $5,000 · EnvironmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA — $1,000 · Youth Development
Health$1,530,000Other$708,450Human Services$507,500Education$497,500Arts & Culture$392,000Philanthropy$172,000Environment$10,000Youth Development$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBAY AREA CANCER CONNECTIONS — $1,525,000 over 6y, 20% of budgetAVENIDAS — $506,000 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetEPACENTER — $275,000 over 4y, 3.9% of budgetPOSITIVE COACHING ALLIANCE — $250,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetTHE PALO ALTO COMMUNITY FUND — $151,000 over 7y, 2.3% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $135,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKENT SCHOOL — $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOACHING CORPS — $100,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetMarwen Foundation Inc — $75,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetKQED INC — $42,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSAN MATEO COUNTY HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPHILANTHROPIC VENTURES FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEASTSIDE COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC — $12,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Silicon Valley Leadership Group Foundation — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGRACE SCIENCE FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPENINSULA VOLUNTEERS INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSilicon Valley Community Foundation — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & SonomaCA19.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · The George and Judy Marcus Family Foundation II · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The George and Judy Marcus Family Foundation · John and Marcia Goldman Foundation · Gordon E and Betty I Moore Foundation · The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Freidenrich Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Freidenrich Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Freidenrich Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph