Skip to content

· Public charity

Freeman Educational Foundation #2113

One of the purposes of this trust is to assist deserving boys and girls of good character who are in need of assistance and who are citizens of both the state of texas and the united states in obtaining a college education in colleges or universities in the state of texas.

$1.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$81k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Health$3.3MReligion$1.8MHuman Services$1.4MPhilanthropy$697kEmployment$556k
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$81,149
Median grant
3
States reached
$37M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE SALVATION ARMY$81,149
CONGREGATION RODFEI SHOLOM$81,149
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$81,149
THE ARC OF SAN ANTONIO$81,149
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$81,149
CLIFFORD CRAIG-BLEDSOE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION$81,149
SAN ANTONIO LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND$81,149
CONGREGATION AGUDAS ACHIM$81,149
CONGREGATION BETHEL$81,149
CHRISTUS SANTA ROSA HEALTH CARE$81,149
SAN ANTONIO JEWISH SENIOR SCV$81,148
FIRST DAY FOUNDATION$81,148
SANTA ROSA CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$81,148
JEWISH FEDERATION OF SAN ANTONIO$81,148
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $971k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%BAPTIST CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $81k → 16%FIRST DAY FOUNDATION: $81k → 16%BAPTIST CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $78k → 16%BAPTIST CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $59k → 16%BAPTIST CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $58k → 16%BAPTIST CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $57k → 16%SAN ANTONIO LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND: $81k → 16%SAN ANTONIO LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND: $81k → 16%SAN ANTONIO LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND: $78k → 16%SAN ANTONIO LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND: $72k → 16%SAN ANTONIO LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND: $69k → 16%SAN ANTONIO LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND: $59k → 16%SAN ANTONIO LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND: $58k → 16%SAN ANTONIO LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND: $57k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.1M · 15 repeat orgs$81k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +53% since the first grant, against -77% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
1

Total granted

$7.1M
$81k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
-77%

Still filing today

53%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $81k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CLIFFORD CRAIG BLEDSOE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION
    8× · 2018–2025 · $556k · revenue +39% · 76% of their budget
  • CS
    Christus Santa Rosa Health Care Corporation
    8× · 2018–2025 · $556k · revenue +93%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    8× · 2018–2025 · $556k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • JC
    JEWISH CARE SYSTEM OF SAN ANTONIO
    one grant, 2025 · $81k · revenue -77%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Antonio Automobile Dealers Association Foundation Inc
—
2
San Antonio Medical Foundation

The mission of the san antonio medical foundation is to improvehealth care, advance biomedical science, and enhance communitywell-being by providing leadership & active stewardship of our landand other assets.

Health
3
San Antonio Community Hospital Health Care Service Plan

The san antonio community hospital health care service plan provides health care insurance to the employees of san antonio regional hospital. the mission of the organization has not been formally adopted by the governing body.

—
4
The Campus of the San Antonio Jewish Community

To support and benefit the religious, charitable, and educational purposes of its nonprofit 501(c)(3) members.

Community Improvement
5
San Antonio Report

Publishing a local online news source. We believe a well informed and connected community is essential to making San Antonio a better place to live, work and play.

Arts & Culture
6
Tennis Officials of San Antonio Association
Recreation & Sports
7
St Elizabeth Adult Day Care Center

St. elizabeth adult day care center's mission is to provide a safe, comfortable, wholesome and stimulating environment for the aged and persons with special needs. we will accomplish this by operating as a christian institution, by…

Human Services
8
San Antonio Christian Dental Clinic

Sa christian dental clinic's mission is to extend christ's healing by providing charitable dental care to underserved bexar county adults. the vision of the clinic is a commitment to creating a community in which dental care and optimal…

—
9
San Juan Regional Medical Center

Better is our mission, improving lives through personalized health and care

Health
10
San Antonio Regional Hospital

Our mission is to improve the health and well-being of the people we serve.

Health
11
Friends of Santa Rosa Foundation

The objectives of friends of santa rosa foundation are to assist, benefit, and support santa rosa health care corporation in providing health care services for residents of san antonio and south texas by raising money to support the…

Health
12
Samf Fund

The primary activity of samf fund is to support the san antonio medical foundation, a 501(c) (3) organization by managing its investments and unrelated real estate.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Christus Children's Foundation; the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CLIFFORD CRAIG BLEDSOE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $555,850 · OtherCLIFFORD CRAIG BLEDSOE MEMORIAL FOUNDATIONCONGREGATION BETH-EL: $555,850 · OtherCONGREGATION BETH-ELCONGREGATION RODFEI SHOLOM BNAI ISRAEL: $555,850 · OtherCONGREGATION RODFEI SHOLOM BNAI ISRAELAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $555,850 · OtherAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INCCONGREGATION AGUDAS ACHIM: $555,850 · OtherCONGREGATION AGUDAS ACHIMThe Salvation Army: $555,833 · OtherThe Salvation ArmySAN ANTONIO JEWISH SENIOR SCV 13409 NW: $141,000 · OtherFIRST DAY FOUNDATION 1506 BEXAR: $141,000 · OtherChristus Santa Rosa Health Care Corporation: $555,843 · HealthChristus Santa Rosa Health Care Corpo…American Heart Association Inc: $555,833 · HealthAmerican Heart Association IncCHRISTUS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $555,832 · HealthCHRISTUS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATIONTHE ARC OF SAN ANTONIO INC: $555,832 · HealthTHE ARC OF SAN ANTONIO INCGOLDEN MANOR INC DBA SAN ANTONIO JEWISH SENIOR SERVICES: $333,701 · HealthGOLDEN MANOR INC DBA SAN ANTONIO JEWI…SAN ANTONIO LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND: $555,833 · Human ServicesSAN ANTONIO LI…FirstDay Foundation: $414,831 · Human ServicesFirstDay Found…JEWISH FEDERATION OF SAN ANTONIO: $555,848 · PhilanthropyJEWISH CARE SYSTEM OF SAN ANTONIO: $81,148 · Housing & Shelter
Other$3,617,083Health$2,557,041Human Services$970,664Philanthropy$555,848Housing & Shelter$81,148

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCLIFFORD CRAIG BLEDSOE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $555,850 over 8y, 76% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF SAN ANTONIO: $555,848 over 8y, 2.7% of budgetChristus Santa Rosa Health Care Corporation: $555,843 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $555,833 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSAN ANTONIO LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND: $555,833 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetCHRISTUS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $555,832 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetTHE ARC OF SAN ANTONIO INC: $555,832 over 8y, 2.0% of budgetFirstDay Foundation: $414,831 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetGOLDEN MANOR INC DBA SAN ANTONIO JEWISH SENIOR SERVICES: $333,701 over 5y, 11% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CLIFFORD CRAIG BLEDSOE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF SAN ANTONIO ↗
  • Who funds Christus Santa Rosa Health Care Corporation ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds SAN ANTONIO LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTUS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE ARC OF SAN ANTONIO INC ↗
  • Who funds FirstDay Foundation ↗
  • Who funds GOLDEN MANOR INC DBA SAN ANTONIO JEWISH SENIOR SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH CARE SYSTEM OF SAN ANTONIO ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Freeman Emma Trust F0211400TX32.8× affinity13 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Freeman Emma Trust F0211400 · San Antonio Area Foundation · Freeman Emma Foundation F0486000 · Jewish Federation of San Antonio · United Way of San Antonio and Bexar County · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Freeman Educational Foundation #2113 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Freeman Educational Foundation #2113. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Freeman Educational Foundation #2113’s filings →

    More from the funding graph