· Public charity
Freeman Educational Foundation #2113
One of the purposes of this trust is to assist deserving boys and girls of good character who are in need of assistance and who are citizens of both the state of texas and the united states in obtaining a college education in colleges or universities in the state of texas.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION | $81,149 |
| THE SALVATION ARMY | $81,149 |
| SAN ANTONIO LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND | $81,149 |
| CONGREGATION AGUDAS ACHIM | $81,149 |
| THE ARC OF SAN ANTONIO | $81,149 |
| CONGREGATION BETHEL | $81,149 |
| CHRISTUS SANTA ROSA HEALTH CARE | $81,149 |
| AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY | $81,149 |
| CONGREGATION RODFEI SHOLOM | $81,149 |
| CLIFFORD CRAIG-BLEDSOE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION | $81,149 |
| SAN ANTONIO JEWISH SENIOR SCV | $81,148 |
| JEWISH FEDERATION OF SAN ANTONIO | $81,148 |
| FIRST DAY FOUNDATION | $81,148 |
| SANTA ROSA CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $81,148 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $971k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +53% since the first grant, against -77% for the ones you funded once.
15 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $81k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CCCLIFFORD CRAIG BLEDSOE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION8× · 2018–2025 · $556k · revenue +39% · 76% of their budget
- CSChristus Santa Rosa Health Care Corporation8× · 2018–2025 · $556k · revenue +93%
- AHAmerican Heart Association Inc8× · 2018–2025 · $556k · revenue +26%
Funded once
- JCJEWISH CARE SYSTEM OF SAN ANTONIOone grant, 2025 · $81k · revenue -77%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of the san antonio medical foundation is to improvehealth care, advance biomedical science, and enhance communitywell-being by providing leadership & active stewardship of our landand other assets.
The san antonio community hospital health care service plan provides health care insurance to the employees of san antonio regional hospital. the mission of the organization has not been formally adopted by the governing body.
To support and benefit the religious, charitable, and educational purposes of its nonprofit 501(c)(3) members.
Publishing a local online news source. We believe a well informed and connected community is essential to making San Antonio a better place to live, work and play.
St. elizabeth adult day care center's mission is to provide a safe, comfortable, wholesome and stimulating environment for the aged and persons with special needs. we will accomplish this by operating as a christian institution, by…
Sa christian dental clinic's mission is to extend christ's healing by providing charitable dental care to underserved bexar county adults. the vision of the clinic is a commitment to creating a community in which dental care and optimal…
Better is our mission, improving lives through personalized health and care
Our mission is to improve the health and well-being of the people we serve.
The objectives of friends of santa rosa foundation are to assist, benefit, and support santa rosa health care corporation in providing health care services for residents of san antonio and south texas by raising money to support the…
The primary activity of samf fund is to support the san antonio medical foundation, a 501(c) (3) organization by managing its investments and unrelated real estate.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Christus Children's Foundation and the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CLIFFORD CRAIG BLEDSOE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF SAN ANTONIO ↗
- Who funds Christus Santa Rosa Health Care Corporation ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds SAN ANTONIO LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND ↗
- Who funds CHRISTUS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE ARC OF SAN ANTONIO INC ↗
- Who funds FirstDay Foundation ↗
- Who funds GOLDEN MANOR INC DBA SAN ANTONIO JEWISH SENIOR SERVICES ↗
- Who funds JEWISH CARE SYSTEM OF SAN ANTONIO ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Freeman Emma Trust F0211400 · San Antonio Area Foundation · Freeman Emma Foundation F0486000 · Jewish Federation of San Antonio · United Way of San Antonio and Bexar County · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Freeman Educational Foundation #2113 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.