Skip to content

· Private foundation

Freelander Family Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$330k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$101k
Largest
01What it funds
0181% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$518kReligion$455kPhilanthropy$244kHealth$179kEducation$178kInternational$126kRecreation & Sports$87kFood & Nutrition$33kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k14 grants · $58k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $97k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $176k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRIENDS OF IMPJ MEHINA$100,540
URJ EISNER CAMP ANNUAL FUND$75,000
VEO-CARDIO-FACIAL SYNDROME INC$35,000
Individual grant recipient$11,800
NEW ISRAEL FUND$10,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF CENTRAL MA$10,000
SOCRATES SCULPTURE PARK$10,000
BARNERT TEMPLE CAPITAL CAMPAIGN$10,000
ZAMIR CHORAL FOUNDATION$10,000
ONEG LEARNING CENTER$5,670
TRINITY COLLEGE ALUMNI FUND$5,000
JARC$5,000
SPRINGFIELD REGIONAL OPERA$5,000
KANSAS CITY CIVIC ORCHESTRA$5,000
TEMPLE ISRAEL YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%URJ EISNER CAMP: $150k → 17%URJ: $102k → 17%FRIENDS OF IMPJ MEHINA: $101k → 17%FRIENDS OF IMPJ MEHINA: $100k → 17%PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FOR KESHET IMPJ: $100k → 17%PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FOR KESHET IMPJ: $100k → 17%URJ EISNER CAMP: $100k → 17%URJ EISNER CAMP ANNUAL FUND: $75k → 17%SPRINGFIELD ARTS COLLECTIVE: $70k → 17%FIDELITY CHARITABLE DONOR ADVISED FUND: $60k → 17%URJ: $52k → 17%URJ: $50k → 17%VELO-CARDIO-FACIAL SYNDROME INC: $40k → 17%BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $38k → 17%VEO-CARDIO-FACIAL SYNDROME INC: $35k → 17%SPRINGFIELD ARTS COLLECTIVE: $35k → 17%VEO-CARDIO-FACIAL SYNDROME INC: $35k → 17%VEO-CARDIO-FACIAL SYNDROME INC: $35k → 17%SPRINGFIELD ARTS COLLECTIVE: $35k → 17%VEO-CARDIO-FACIAL SYNDROME INC: $30k → 17%AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE: $28k → 17%TRINITY COLLEGE: $28k → 17%TRINITY COLLEGE: $28k → 17%BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $28k → 17%BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $28k → 17%UJA FEDERATION ISRAEL EMERGENCY FUND: $25k → 17%TANGLEWOOD LEARNING INSTITUTE: $20k → 17%UJA FEDERATION ISRAEL EMERGENCY FUND: $20k → 17%KESHETPEF ISRAEL: $20k → 17%ROMEMU BUILDING CAMPAIGN: $20k → 17%AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE: $17k → 17%BARNERT TEMPLE: $16k → 17%WUPJ: $16k → 17%JEWISH FED OF BERKSHIRES AND CENTRAL MA: $16k → 17%JEWISH FEDERATION OF CENTRAL MASS: $15k → 17%BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $15k → 17%WUPJ: $15k → 17%MMFS: $14k → 17%ROMEMU: $14k → 17%BARNERT TEMPLE CAPITAL CAMPAIGN: $14k → 17%UJA FEDERATION: $13k → 17%ZAMIR CHORAL FOUNDATION: $12k → 17%SPRINGFIELD REGIONAL COLLECTIVE: $12k → 17%JEWISH FED OF BERKSHIRES AND CENTRAL MA: $12k → 17%ROMEMU CONGREGATION: $12k → 17%ROMEMU: $11k → 17%ZAMIR CHORAL FOUNDATION: $11k → 17%ZAMIR CHORAL FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 43 repeat orgs$334k to everyone else

43 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 26 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

43
43

Total granted

$2.2M
$305k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+41%

Still filing today

14%
2%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $29k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyArts & CultureReligionCommunity ImprovementInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ZC
    ZAMIR CHORAL FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $73k · revenue +14%
  • SS
    SOCRATES SCULPTURE PARK INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $70k · revenue +3%
  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $23k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • FC
    FIDELITY CHARITABLE DONOR ADVISED FUND
    one grant, 2021 · $60k
  • VS
    VELO-CARDIO-FACIAL SYNDROME INC
    one grant, 2021 · $40k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Judaism Foundation
—
2
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
3
American Jewish Committee

AJC's mission is to enhance the wellbeing of the Jewish people and Israel, and to advance human rights and democratic values in the United States and around the world. In pursuit of this mission, AJC advances democratic principles, fights…

Civil Rights
4
Us Middle East Project Inc

The organization's mission is to engage in non partisan analysis of u.s. foreign policy in the middle east, with special emphasis on the middle east peace process, and to present policymakers in the united states, in the region and in the…

International
5
The Jewish Federations of North America Inc

The federation movement protects and enhances the well-being of jews worldwide through the values of tikkun olam (repairing the world), tzedakah (charity and social justice) and torah (jewish learning). the jewish federations of north…

Philanthropy
6
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
7
Better Future for Israel

To strengthen israel's future in these areas: 1)providing new immigrants with assistance in a few key areas: representing them as they navigate government ministries and assisting them with their challenges as new immigrants to israel.…

Philanthropy
8
Wisdom Without Walls Inc

Wisdom without walls is a nonprofit, nondenominational, online learning community that hosts intimate conversations with the most prominent voices in contemporary jewish thought, fostering discussions without ideological barriers.

Religion
9
National Council of Jewish Women Inc Jersey Hills Section
—
10
Jewish National Fund (Keren Kayemeth Leisrael) Inc

Jewish national fund gives all generations of jews a unique voice in building a prosperous future for the land of israel and its people.

International
11
Abrahamic Reunion Inc

The abrahamic reunion works to build sustainable peace with diverse faith communities in the holy land. we foster harmony by exploring common abrahamic values in order to create deep and lasting connections between people.

International
12
Weitzman National Museum of American Jewish History

The weitzman national museum of american jewish history, on independence mall in philadelphia, presents educational programs and experiences that preserve, explore, and celebrate the history of jews in america. its purpose is to connect…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Funders Network; the most unlike its peers is Socrates Sculpture Park Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 93 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $250,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientURJ: $203,800 · OtherURJFRIENDS OF IMPJ MEHINA: $200,540 · OtherFRIENDS OF IMPJ MEHINAPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FOR KESHET IMPJ: $200,000 · OtherPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FOR KESHET IMPJSPRINGFIELD ARTS COLLECTIVE: $140,000 · OtherSPRINGFIELD ARTS COLLECTIVEVEO-CARDIO-FACIAL SYNDROME INC: $135,000 · OtherVEO-CARDIO-FACIAL SYNDROME INCBOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $123,750 · Other+78 more: $1,069,405 · Other+78 moreAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC: $70,000 · InternationalNEW ISRAEL FUND: $10,000 · International+1 more: $1,000 · InternationalZAMIR CHORAL FOUNDATION INC: $72,560 · Arts & CultureSOCRATES SCULPTURE PARK INC: $70,000 · Community ImprovementUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $23,476 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FUNDERS NETWORK: $4,830 · PhilanthropyODYSSEY IMPACT INC: $2,000 · Religion
Other$2,322,495International$81,000Arts & Culture$72,560Community Improvement$70,000Philanthropy$28,306Religion$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetZAMIR CHORAL FOUNDATION INC: $72,560 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetSOCRATES SCULPTURE PARK INC: $70,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC: $70,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $23,476 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetELLUMINATE INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetJEWISH FUNDERS NETWORK: $4,830 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetODYSSEY IMPACT INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHIAS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ZAMIR CHORAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SOCRATES SCULPTURE PARK INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY14.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Robert M Abramson Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Freelander Family Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Freelander Family Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 88%
  • Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 93 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Freelander Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph