Skip to content

· Private foundation

Fredric G & Mary L Novy Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$13k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$113kHealth$54kArts & Culture$10kRecreation & Sports$8kHuman Services$5kYouth Development$1kCrime & Legal$1k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,625
Median grant
2
States reached
$68k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MISERICORDIA FOUNDATION$5,444
DANNY DID FOUNDATION$3,625
DANIEL MURPHY SCHOLARSHIP FUND$2,500
BOBBY NICHOLS FIDDLESTICKS CHARITY FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MISERICORDIA FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$165k · 8 repeat orgs$28k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +93% since the first grant, against +33% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
8

Total granted

$165k
$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+93%
+33%

Still filing today

50%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CulturePhilanthropyRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DD
    DANNY DID FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $44k · revenue +176%
  • DM
    DANIEL MURPHY SCHOLARSHIP FUND
    6× · 2020–2025 · $25k · revenue +89%
  • BN
    BOBBY NICHOLS - FIDDLESTICKS FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2017–2025 · $8k · revenue +93%

Funded once

  • LO
    Lyric Opera of Chicagograduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +33%
  • FV
    FRANKIE V POLLETTA FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • HN
    HEREDITARY NEUROPATHY FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue -14%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Illinois Foundation

The Foundation, a 501(c)(3) charitable organization, is an independent and separate nonprofit entity from the University of Illinois. Our mission is to encourage and administer private gifts and serve the UI System by working closely with…

Education
2
Society for Neuroscience

Sfn's mission is to: 1. advance the understanding of the brain and the nervous system by bringing together scientists of all segments of neuroscience, by facilitating the integration of research directed at all levels of biological…

Health
3
National Public Radio Inc

National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…

Arts & Culture
4
Saint Andrew's School of Boca Raton Inc

Saint andrew's school is an independent school founded in the episcopal tradition. our mission is to build a community of learners, provide excellence in education, and nurture each student in mind, body, and spirit.

Education
5
Solomon Schechter Endowment Foundation

The foundation was organized exclusively for the benefit of and to carry out the purposes of the solomon schechter day school.

Education
6
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
7
Chicago Charter School Foundation

Our vibrant network of diverse chicago charter schools enables students to thrive every day, puts them on a path to success in college and life, and empowers entrepreneurial educators to pursue excellence through innovation.

Education
8
Raspberry Pi Foundation North America Inc

Raspberry pi foundation north america enables young people to realize their full potential through the power of computer science and ai.

Science & Tech
9
International Surfing Association Inc

To develop and promote the sport of surfing globally. the organization is recognized by the international olympic committee as the world governing authority for surfing, standup paddle (sup) surfing and racing, and all other wave riding…

Recreation & Sports
10
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
11
Chicago Jewish Day School Endowment Foundation

The foundation was established exclusively for the benefit of and to carry out the purposes of the chicago jewish day school.

Education
12
Leonard and Diane Sherman Family Foundation

The foundation is organized to foster, promote, support, develop, encourage and maintain the broad charitable, educational and/or religious purpose of, the jewish federation of metropolitan chicago, and the foundation as authorized in…

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Misericordia Foundation; the most unlike its peers is The Academy At St Joan of Arc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $40,000 · OtherEVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATIONLOYOLA ACADEMY: $26,500 · OtherLOYOLA ACADEMYDANIEL MURPHY SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $24,500 · OtherDANIEL MURPHY SCHOLARSHIP FUNDEVANS SCHOLAR FOUNDATION: $20,000 · OtherEVANS SCHOLAR FOUNDATIONFRANKIE V POLLETTA FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Other+3 more: $2,750 · OtherDANNY DID FOUNDATION: $44,075 · HealthDANNY DID FOUNDATIONHEREDITARY NEUROPATHY FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 · Health+1 more: $1,500 · HealthLyric Opera of Chicago: $10,000 · Arts & CultureBOBBY NICHOLS - FIDDLESTICKS FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 · PhilanthropyMISERICORDIA FOUNDATION: $5,444 · Human ServicesTHE ACADEMY AT ST JOAN OF ARC: $2,000 · EducationBERNIE'S BOOK BANK: $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $300 · Recreation & Sports
Other$118,750Health$47,575Arts & Culture$10,000Philanthropy$8,000Human Services$5,444Education$2,000Youth Development$1,000Recreation & Sports$300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDANNY DID FOUNDATION: $44,075 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetDANIEL MURPHY SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $24,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetLyric Opera of Chicago: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOBBY NICHOLS - FIDDLESTICKS FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetMISERICORDIA FOUNDATION: $5,444 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEREDITARY NEUROPATHY FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE ACADEMY AT ST JOAN OF ARC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetErikas Lighthouse A Beacon of Hope for Adolescent Depression: $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBERNIE'S BOOK BANK: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DANNY DID FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DANIEL MURPHY SCHOLARSHIP FUND ↗
  • Who funds Lyric Opera of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds BOBBY NICHOLS - FIDDLESTICKS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MISERICORDIA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HEREDITARY NEUROPATHY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ACADEMY AT ST JOAN OF ARC ↗
  • Who funds Erikas Lighthouse A Beacon of Hope for Adolescent Depression ↗
  • Who funds BERNIE'S BOOK BANK ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arthur J Gallagher FoundationIL12.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fredric G & Mary L Novy Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fredric G & Mary L Novy Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Fredric G & Mary L Novy’s filings →

    More from the funding graph