Skip to content

· Private foundation

Frederick Pitzman Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$345k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$276k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Environment$1.5MEducation$161kHealth$82kRecreation & Sports$54kAnimals$42kCommunity Improvement$40kArts & Culture$31kYouth Development$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $33k
  • $250k+1 grant · $276k
$2,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$4.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OZARK LAND TRUST$276,000
CROSSROADS SCHOOLS$23,000
FOREST PARK FOREVER$10,000
ST LOUIS ZOO ASSOCIATION$7,000
ST LOUIS COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION$5,000
JOHN BORROUGHS SCHOOL$4,000
GATEWAY TO THE GREAT OUTDOORS$3,500
FDN FOR BARNES-JEWISH HOSPITAL$2,500
READY READERS$2,000
RIVER CITY JOURNALISM FUND$2,000
MISSOURI FAMILY HEALTH COUNCIL$1,500
NEW CITY SCHOOL INC$1,500
FRIENDS OF KWMU$1,200
ST LOUIS PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION$1,200
Individual grant recipient$1,200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%TEXAS INST OF DEV PEDIATRICS: $1k → 10%ST LOUIS AREA DIAPER BANK: $1k → 11%TX INSOF DEVELOPMENTAL PEDIATRI: $500 → 10%ST LOUIS AREA DIAPER BANK: $1k → 11%TEXAS INST OF DEV PEDIATRICS: $500 → 10%TEXAS INSTITUTE DEVELOPMENTAL PEDIATRICS: $200 → 10%TEXAS INST OF DEV PEDIATRICS: $200 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 25 repeat orgs$62k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against -4% for those funded once.

25 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
13

Total granted

$1.8M
$24k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
-4%

Still filing today

80%
15%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $38k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthEnvironmentArts & CultureHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FP
    Forest Park Forever Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $54k · revenue +137%
  • CS
    CROSSROADS SCHOOL DBA CROSSROADS COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL
    5× · 2020–2024 · $51k · revenue +3%
  • GT
    Gateway to the Great Outdoors
    6× · 2020–2025 · $40k · revenue +230%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $7k
  • SL
    ST LOUIS ZOO ASSOCIATION P
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • FF
    FOUNDATION FOR BARNES-JEWISH HOS
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Louis Community Foundation

To promote the possibilities of charitable giving, helping charitable citizens understand how they can effectively provide for the community they love and the causes they care deeply about.

Philanthropy
2
Mission St Louis

Mission: st. louis empowers individuals for social and economic growth through relationships and opportunity.

Community Improvement
3
Thomas Jefferson School

Thomas jefferson school engages its students in the education necessary to live as responsible citizens of the world. through the strongest possible college-prepatory program and within a nurturing community, students develop a…

—
4
Missouri Western State University Foundation Inc

The missouri western state university foundation is a not-for-profit charitable organization that functions solely to support the mission of missouri western state university, as stated in the university's mission statement. the foundation…

—
5
St Louis Jewish Light

The st. louis jewish light is a non-profit, independent news source whose mission is to inform, inspire, educate, and connect the st. louis jewish community.

—
6
St Louis Economic Development Partnership

Economic development.

—
7
Missouri Historical Society

The missouri historical society (mhs) is a missouri pro forma decree, not-for-profit corporation whose primary functions are educational and community programs; collections and conservation; library and research; and exhibitions.…

Arts & Culture
8
St Louis Sports Commission Inc

Foster economic growth and improved quality of life in the st. louis area by producing events, enhancing its national and international image as a premier sports region, and increasing community awareness of the value of sports.

—
9
Jazz St Louis

Jazz st louis is a not-for-profit organization whose mission is to lead our community in advancing the uniquely american art of jazz through performance, education, and community engagement.

Arts & Culture
10
University of the Ozarks

True to our christian heritage, we prepare students from diverse religious, cultural, educational and economic backgrounds to live life fully.

Education
11
Jefferson Regional Foundation

The mission of the foundation is to improve the health and well-being of the communities served by jefferson hospital through engagement, community-driven research and grantmaking. there are three grantmaking priorities focused on the…

Health
12
St Louis Bar Foundation

The st. louis bar foundation promotes the rule of law and the administration of justice in both our society and within the legal profession. the foundation seeks to improve the administration of justice in our community through law related…

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc; the most unlike its peers is Texas Institute of Developmental Pediatrics. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
17/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OZARK REGIONAL LAND TRUST INC DBA OZARK LAND TRUST: $1,443,701 · EnvironmentOZARK REGIONAL LAND TRUST INC DBA OZARK LAND TRUSTForest Park Forever Inc: $54,000 · Environment+1 more: $21,000 · EnvironmentCROSSROADS SCHOOL DBA CROSSROADS COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL: $50,500 · OtherCROSSROADS SCHO…PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE: $49,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTH…ST LOUIS ZOO: $28,000 · OtherST LOUIS ZOOCROSSROADS SCHOOLS: $23,000 · OtherCROSSROADS SCHO…BARNES JEWISH HOSPITAL: $15,000 · OtherBARNES JEWISH H…ST LOUIS COMMUNITY COLLEGE FDNT: $12,000 · OtherST LOUIS COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $12,000 · OtherThe New City School Inc: $10,700 · OtherTHE SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION OF ST LOUIS: $9,000 · OtherAIM HIGH ST LOUIS: $9,000 · Other+19 more: $34,200 · Other+19 moreWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $22,000 · EducationREADY READERS: $15,500 · EducationJOHN BURROUGHS SCHOOL: $4,000 · EducationTHE LIBRARY FOUNDATION FOR THE BENEFIT OF ST LOUIS PUBLIC LIBRARY: $2,400 · EducationGateway to the Great Outdoors: $39,500 · Community ImprovementFRIENDS OF KWMU INC: $9,200 · Arts & CultureTHE SHELDON ARTS FOUNDATION: $8,000 · Arts & CultureRIVER CITY JOURNALISM FUND INC: $2,000 · Arts & CultureMISSOURI FAMILY HEALTH COUNCIL INC: $4,500 · HealthTHE FOUNDATION FOR BARNES-JEWISH HOSPITAL: $4,500 · HealthHOPE HAPPENS INC: $3,000 · HealthPREVENTED: $2,100 · HealthTHE SAINT LOUIS ZOO ASSOCIATION: $7,000 · Animals
Environment$1,518,701Other$252,400Education$43,900Community Improvement$39,500Arts & Culture$19,200Health$14,100Animals$7,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOZARK REGIONAL LAND TRUST INC DBA OZARK LAND TRUST: $1,443,701 over 6y, 39% of budgetForest Park Forever Inc: $54,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCROSSROADS SCHOOL DBA CROSSROADS COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL: $50,500 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetGateway to the Great Outdoors: $39,500 over 6y, 7.2% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $22,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES: $21,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetREADY READERS: $15,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetST LOUIS COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $12,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetThe New City School Inc: $10,700 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF KWMU INC: $9,200 over 6y, 6.6% of budgetTHE SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION OF ST LOUIS: $9,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAIM HIGH ST LOUIS: $9,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetTHE SHELDON ARTS FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMISSOURI FAMILY HEALTH COUNCIL INC: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR BARNES-JEWISH HOSPITAL: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJOHN BURROUGHS SCHOOL: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE HAPPENS INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetTEXAS INSTITUTE OF DEVELOPMENTAL PEDIATRICS: $2,400 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetTHE LIBRARY FOUNDATION FOR THE BENEFIT OF ST LOUIS PUBLIC LIBRARY: $2,400 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPREVENTED: $2,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRIVER CITY JOURNALISM FUND INC: $2,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetST LOUIS AREA DIAPER BANK: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBEYOND HOUSING INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS INC: $600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDOUBLE HELIX CORPORATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OZARK REGIONAL LAND TRUST INC DBA OZARK LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds Forest Park Forever Inc ↗
  • Who funds CROSSROADS SCHOOL DBA CROSSROADS COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Gateway to the Great Outdoors ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES ↗
  • Who funds READY READERS ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The New City School Inc ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF KWMU INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION OF ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds AIM HIGH ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds THE SHELDON ARTS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE SAINT LOUIS ZOO ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds MISSOURI FAMILY HEALTH COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FOUNDATION FOR BARNES-JEWISH HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds JOHN BURROUGHS SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds HOPE HAPPENS INC ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS INSTITUTE OF DEVELOPMENTAL PEDIATRICS ↗
  • Who funds THE LIBRARY FOUNDATION FOR THE BENEFIT OF ST LOUIS PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds PREVENTED ↗
  • Who funds RIVER CITY JOURNALISM FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS AREA DIAPER BANK ↗
  • Who funds BEYOND HOUSING INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Louis Community Foundation IncMO27× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation Inc · St Louis Community Foundation · Moneta Group Charitable Foundation · Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company · Edward Jones Foundation · The Kranzberg Family Charitable Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Sander Foundation · Pott Foundation · Sam and Marilyn Fox Foundation · Brown Dana Charitable Trust · Edward Jones Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Frederick Pitzman Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Frederick Pitzman Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Frederick Pitzman’s filings →

    More from the funding graph