Skip to content
Frederick and Ida Hummel Foundation Xxxxx8006 at a glance

· Private foundation

Frederick and Ida Hummel Foundation Xxxxx8006

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$921k
Granted FY2023
10
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$113k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Human Services$632kHealth$255kHousing & Shelter$90kYouth Development$90kEducation$61kReligion$25k
02FY2023 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$89,749
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDRENS HOME AND AID$112,769
THE CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE$89,749
ONWARD NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE$89,749
LA RABIDA CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$89,749
UCAN$89,749
LYDIA HOME ASSOCIATION$89,749
CHICAGO COMMONS ASSOCIATION$89,749
ERIE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE$89,749
METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICES$89,749
ASSOCIATION HOUSE OF CHICAGO$89,749
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $875k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ERIE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $90k → 14%ASSOCIATION HOUSE OF CHICAGO: $90k → 14%THE CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE: $90k → 14%THE CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE: $13k → 14%THE CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE: $11k → 14%THE CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE: $10k → 14%THE CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE: $10k → 14%THE CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE: $10k → 14%THE CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE: $10k → 14%CHICAGO COMMONS ASSOCIATION: $90k → 14%CHILDRENS HOME AND AID: $113k → 14%METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICES: $90k → 14%CHILDRENS HOME AND AID: $16k → 14%CHILDRENS HOME AND AID: $15k → 14%CHILDRENS HOME AND AID: $12k → 14%CHILDRENS HOME AND AID: $10k → 14%CHILDRENS HOME AND AID: $10k → 14%CHILDRENS HOME AND AID: $7k → 14%LYDIA HOME ASSOCIATION: $90k → 14%UCAN: $90k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

37%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$423k · 4 repeat orgs$730k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2023, 2 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
1

Total granted

$423k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+18%

Still filing today

75%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 22% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $718k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
Human ServicesHealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HOME & AID SOCIETY OF ILL
    7× · 2017–2023 · $183k · revenue +41%
  • THE CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR VISUALLY IMPAIRED
    7× · 2017–2023 · $154k · revenue +61%
  • KC
    KNOX COLLEGE
    6× · 2017–2022 · $61k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • AC
    ADVOCATE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $12k · revenue +18%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christopher House

Christopher house is a family of schools that helps children and families succeed in school, the workplace, and life. through our unique and innovative approach, we are effectively closing the opportunity gap through a continuum of…

Human Services
2
Illinois Children's Healthcare Foundation
Human Services
3
Henry Booth House

The organization is organized to provide social services for children and families from Birth thru five years of age. Our mission is to "improve the quality of life for families in culturally and economically diverse Chicago communities by…

Human Services
4
Infant Welfare Society of Chicago

Infant welfare society of chicago (iws) (d/b/a iws family health) provides quality medical, dental and behavioral health services for the health, physical and mental development of children and their families in the chicagoland community.

—
5
Chicago Children's Advocacy Center

The chicago children's advocacy center unites public, private, and community partners to ensure the safety, health, and well-being of abused children.

Crime & Legal
6
Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago

Ann & robert h. lurie children's hospital of chicago is dedicated to the health and well-being of all children. as the pediatric teaching facility for northwestern university feinberg school of medicine, this commitment drives us to be a…

Health
7
Edward-Elmhurst Healthcare

Edward-Elmhurst Healthcare follows the mission of Endeavor Health to "help everyone in our communities be their best."

Health
8
Chicago Family Health Center Inc

Chicago family health center will promote health, work to prevent disease and provide treatment through the delivery of quality, accessible primary healtcare that is culturally sensitive, affordable, and responsive to community and…

—
9
Illinois Action for Children

Illinois Action for Children uplifts children and all who care for them, advancing strong families and prosperous communities.

—
10
Children's Hospital of Chicago Medical Center

We are dedicated to the health and well-being of all children. as the pediatric teaching facility for the northwestern university feinberg school of medicine, this commitment drives us to be a leader in: -pediatric health care delivery…

Health
11
Pediatric Faculty Foundation Inc

We value excellence and innovation in clinical and basic research, coordinated and comprehensive patient care, ongoing physician education, and evidence-based child advocacy. our goal is to provide leadership in endeavors that promote the…

Health
12
Oak Leyden Developmental Services Inc

To help people with developmental disabilities meet life's challenges and reach their highest potential.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Home & Aid Society of Ill; the most unlike its peers is Knox College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
11/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHILDREN'S HOME & AID SOCIETY OF ILL: $182,923 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S HOME & AID SOCIETY OF ILLTHE CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR VISUALLY IMPAIRED: $153,749 · Human ServicesTHE CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR VISUALLY IMPAIREDASSOCIATION HOUSE OF CHICAGO: $89,749 · Human ServicesASSOCIATION HOUSE OF CHICAGOUCAN: $89,749 · Human ServicesUCANERIE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $89,749 · Human ServicesERIE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSEChicago Commons Association: $89,749 · Human ServicesChicago Commons AssociationLYDIA HOME ASSOCIATION: $89,749 · Human ServicesLYDIA HOME ASSOCIATIONMetropolitan Family Services: $89,749 · Human ServicesMetropolitan Family ServicesONWARD NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $89,749 · OtherONWARD NEIG…PEOPLES CHURCH OF CHICAGO: $25,465 · OtherPEOPLES CHU…La Rabida Children's Hospital: $89,749 · HealthLa Rabida…ADVOCATE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $11,781 · HealthADVOCATE …KNOX COLLEGE: $61,309 · Education
Human Services$875,166Other$115,214Health$101,530Education$61,309

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHILDREN'S HOME & AID SOCIETY OF ILL: $182,923 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR VISUALLY IMPAIRED: $153,749 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetASSOCIATION HOUSE OF CHICAGO: $89,749 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetUCAN: $89,749 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetONWARD NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $89,749 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetERIE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $89,749 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetLa Rabida Children's Hospital: $89,749 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetChicago Commons Association: $89,749 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLYDIA HOME ASSOCIATION: $89,749 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMetropolitan Family Services: $89,749 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKNOX COLLEGE: $61,309 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetADVOCATE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $11,781 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Paul M Angell Family …United Way of Metropo…Pwc Foundation IncThe Chicago Community…The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Paul M Angell Family FoundationIL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Paul M Angell Family Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · Pwc Foundation Inc · The Chicago Community Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Frederick and Ida Hummel Foundation Xxxxx8006 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Frederick and Ida Hummel Foundation Xxxxx8006. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Frederick and Ida Hummel Foundation Xxxxx8006’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home