Skip to content

· Private foundation

Freda B Runyon Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$79k
Granted FY2025still arriving
28
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$91kHuman Services$82kHealth$62kYouth Development$60kRecreation & Sports$51kAnimals$28kHousing & Shelter$26kEducation$23kOther$0
02FY2025 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$3.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HANDS 4 HOPE$5,000
LOAVES & FISHES MUSTARD SEED PROGRAM$4,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB EDC WESTERN SLOPE$4,000
THE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE$3,890
UPPER ROOM DINING HALL$3,700
K-9 ARMOR$3,600
MUSEUM OF SCIENCE & CURIOSITY$3,500
ASSISTANCE LEAGUE SIERRA FOOTHILLS$3,500
FOOD BANK OF EL DORAD COUNTY$3,400
CATIES CLOSET$3,200
SOIL BORN FARMS$3,000
ANGEL FLIGHT NORTHEAST$3,000
SPECIAL OLYMPICS OF NORCALEL DORADO$3,000
SENIORS FIRST$3,000
FISHING FOR THE MISSION$2,857
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $63k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 24% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CATIES CLOSET: $3k → 8%RYANS CASE FOR SMILES: $2k → 6%FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN WARRIORS: $2k → 11%FIELD OF DREAMS INC: $4k → 11%ABILITY FOUND: $4k → 8%CATIES CLOSET: $3k → 8%RYANS CASE FOR SMILES: $2k → 6%FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN WARRIORS: $2k → 11%FIELD OF DREAMS INC: $4k → 11%ABILITY FOUND: $3k → 8%CATIES CLOSET: $3k → 8%RYANS CASE FOR SMILES: $1k → 6%TOMMY APOSTOLOS FUND: $2k → 6%NO TIME TO WASTE: $3k → 8%ABILITY FOUND: $2k → 8%NO TIME TO WASTE: $2k → 8%FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN WARRIORS: $2k → 11%UNION GOSPEL MISSION: $3k → 12%SENIORS FIRST: $3k → 6%SENIORS FIRST: $3k → 6%SENIORS FIRST: $3k → 6%SENIORS FIRST: $3k → 6%THE GATHERING INN: $2k → 6%NEW MORNING YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES: $3k → 8%GILMORE HERO FOUNDATION: $3k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WI
MI
NY
MA
NV
PA
CA
UT
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 22% of Freda B Runyon Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 83% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 65%.

Freda B Runyon Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.1% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$342k · 39 repeat orgs$141k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +30% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

39 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
46

Total granted

$342k
$121k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+23%

Still filing today

54%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionAnimalsRecreation & SportsEmploymentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UR
    UPPER ROOM DINING HALL INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $20k · revenue +127%
  • SB
    SOIL BORN FARM URBAN AGRICULTURE PROJECT
    4× · 2021–2025 · $14k · revenue +105%
  • SF
    SENIORS FIRST INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $12k · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • M
    MORE
    one grant, 2020 · $8k
  • EF
    EPPING FIREMENS ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2023 · $6k
  • FM
    FAMILY MEAL SACRAMENTO
    one grant, 2020 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Foothill Dog Rescue of the Sierras

Foothill Dog Rescue is a 100% all volunteer organization dedicated to re-homing dogs from over crowded animal shelters, owner surrenders and underserved communities. We also sponsor vaccine and microchip clinics for our County and have…

Animals
2
Our Heroes Dreams

To improve the lives of our nations warriors (veterans, first responders, peace officers, and their families) by helping them build a new mission and purpose in life, support their recovery and reintegration, and empower them to accomplish…

Health
3
Wonder Dog Rescue

Wonder dog rescue was founded to rescue any animal at risk of euthanasia due to health or behavior issues. we rescue animals throughout northern and central california with a special focus on special needs and hospice animals

Animals
4
Mission Flight

Our mission is to fly medical patients to critically needed appointments within California as well as to fly volunteer teams into remote, impoverished areas of Mexico. Our passion is to connect people who are isolated and in poverty with…

International
5
Tahoe Nordic Search & Rescue Inc

The tahoe nordic search and rescue team (tnsar) ... was conceived in 1976 as a response to the death of a boy lost off the back side of northstar-at-tahoe ski area during a blizzard. there was, at the time, no organized backcountry team to…

—
6
Sierra Pacific Furbabies Inc

Sierra Pacific picks up, treat and places injured and abandoned animals.

Animals
7
High Sierra Animal Rescue Inc

High Sierra Animal Rescues mission is to save the lives of homeless dogs in the regions served. Our staff and volunteers are dedicated to making our communities better through successful adoptions advancing their welfare and creating human…

Animals
8
Siskiyou Community Food Bank

We provided free healthy food to low-income families and individuals in need.

Food & Nutrition
9
Norcal Golden Retriever Rescue Inc

Norcal Golden Retriever Rescue is an all-volunteer organization that has rescued and found permanent, loving homes for Golden Retrievers and Golden Retriever mixes since its inception in 1994. Through the dedicated work of its foster…

Animals
10
Leave No Paws Behind Inc

Conduct animal rescues, rehabilitation and rehome senior animals abandoned to the shelter's system.

Animals
11
Inclusion Revolution Inc a California Nonprofit Corporation

Camp Revolution provides a safe, fun and motivational overnight outdoor camping experience for differently-abled teens and adults. Our goal is to empower each camper with confidence, boost self-esteem, experience outdoor adventures and…

Human Services
12
Care for the Children

Our mission is to provide homebound older adults with low income with nutritious food box delivery. Additionally, our food distribution program provides food to all in the communities we serve who need a helping hand. Our programs aim to…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Union Gospel Mission; the most unlike its peers is Golden Eagle Softball Association Gesa. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 93 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
44/46
Grantees still filing
33/46
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HANDS 4 HOPE: $22,500 · OtherHANDS 4 HOPEAGGIE HOUSE - UC DAVIS: $16,000 · OtherLOAVES & FISHES MUSTARD SEED PROGRAM: $15,500 · OtherARC WAKAMATSU FARM: $13,300 · OtherSPECIAL OLYMPICS OF NORCALEL DORADO: $13,000 · OtherTwin Lakes Food Bank: $12,311 · OtherAssistance League of Sierra Foothills: $12,105 · Other+58 more: $217,292 · Other+58 moreSENIORS FIRST INC: $12,000 · Human ServicesSENIORS FIRST …ABILITY FOUND CORPORATION: $9,000 · Human ServicesABILITY FOUND …Catie's Closet Inc: $8,200 · Human ServicesCatie's Closet…FIELD OF DREAMS INC: $7,500 · Human ServicesFIELD OF DREAM…FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN WARRIORS: $5,000 · Human ServicesFOUNDATION FOR…NO TIME TO WASTE: $4,500 · Human ServicesNO TIME TO WAS…RYAN'S CASE FOR SMILES: $4,326 · Human ServicesRYAN'S CASE FO…Gilmore Hero Foundation: $3,000 · Human ServicesUNION GOSPEL MISSION: $2,500 · Human ServicesNEW MORNING YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES: $2,500 · Human Services+2 more: $4,000 · Human Services+2 moreUPPER ROOM DINING HALL INC: $19,728 · Food & NutritionFood Bank of El Dorado County: $9,400 · Food & NutritionFOOD LITERACY CENTER: $5,310 · Food & NutritionTAHOE FOOD HUB: $2,575 · Food & Nutrition+1 more: $1,200 · Food & NutritionSIERRA WILDLIFE RESCUE: $10,100 · AnimalsHERO PUPS INC: $3,000 · AnimalsAll About Equine Animal Rescue Inc: $2,495 · AnimalsANIMAL PROTECTION LEAGUE: $1,313 · AnimalsSOIL BORN FARM URBAN AGRICULTURE PROJECT: $14,000 · EmploymentKELLIS COOKIES FOR GOODNESS BAKES: $2,000 · EmploymentSOS OUTREACH: $8,000 · Recreation & SportsStephen J Wampler Foundation Camp WAMP: $6,500 · Recreation & SportsGOLDEN EAGLE SOFTBALL ASSOCIATION GESA: $1,000 · Recreation & SportsANGEL FLIGHT OF NEW ENGLAND INC: $8,450 · HealthSWEET DREAMS FOUNDATION: $2,800 · Health
Other$322,008Human Services$62,526Food & Nutrition$38,213Animals$16,908Employment$16,000Recreation & Sports$15,500Health$11,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUPPER ROOM DINING HALL INC: $19,728 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetSOIL BORN FARM URBAN AGRICULTURE PROJECT: $14,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTwin Lakes Food Bank: $12,311 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetAssistance League of Sierra Foothills: $12,105 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetSENIORS FIRST INC: $12,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSIERRA WILDLIFE RESCUE: $10,100 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetFood Bank of El Dorado County: $9,400 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetProject Ride Inc: $9,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetABILITY FOUND CORPORATION: $9,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetANGEL FLIGHT OF NEW ENGLAND INC: $8,450 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCatie's Closet Inc: $8,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSOS OUTREACH: $8,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCalifornia Careforce: $8,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetFIELD OF DREAMS INC: $7,500 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetStephen J Wampler Foundation Camp WAMP: $6,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetFOOD LITERACY CENTER: $5,310 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDSHIP CIRCLE: $5,007 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR WOMEN WARRIORS: $5,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetNO TIME TO WASTE: $4,500 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetRYAN'S CASE FOR SMILES: $4,326 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGilmore Hero Foundation: $3,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetHERO PUPS INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetEL DORADO COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $2,800 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSWEET DREAMS FOUNDATION: $2,800 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetUNION GOSPEL MISSION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEW MORNING YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAll About Equine Animal Rescue Inc: $2,495 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGuitars For Vets Inc: $2,045 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE GATHERING INN: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLEGE OF THE SISKIYOUS FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetKELLIS COOKIES FOR GOODNESS BAKES: $2,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTINY PINE FOUNDATION: $1,531 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetANIMAL PROTECTION LEAGUE: $1,313 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL TEEN LEADERSHIP PROGRAMS INC: $1,200 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetCLEAR LAKE GLEANERS INC: $1,200 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetIF GIVEN A CHANCE: $1,200 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBest Buddies International Inc: $1,029 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Heartway Inc: $1,023 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSOLDIERS' ANGELS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILD CREATIVITY LAB: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UPPER ROOM DINING HALL INC ↗
  • Who funds SOIL BORN FARM URBAN AGRICULTURE PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds Twin Lakes Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds Assistance League of Sierra Foothills ↗
  • Who funds SENIORS FIRST INC ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA WILDLIFE RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds Food Bank of El Dorado County ↗
  • Who funds Project Ride Inc ↗
  • Who funds ABILITY FOUND CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds ANGEL FLIGHT OF NEW ENGLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds Catie's Closet Inc ↗
  • Who funds SOS OUTREACH ↗
  • Who funds California Careforce ↗
  • Who funds FIELD OF DREAMS INC ↗
  • Who funds Stephen J Wampler Foundation Camp WAMP ↗
  • Who funds EPPING FIREMENS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds FOOD LITERACY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN WARRIORS ↗
  • Who funds NO TIME TO WASTE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sacramento Region Community FoundationCA34.5× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sacramento Region Community Foundation · El Dorado Community Foundation · Teichert Foundation · Deacon Charitable Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Placer Community Foundation · United Way California Capital Region · California Foundation for Stronger Communities · The Albertsons Companies Foundation · Carlsen Muir Family Foundation · Sacramento Food Bank & Family Services · Sutter Valley Hospitals

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Freda B Runyon Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Freda B Runyon Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Catie's Closet Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Best Buddies International Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 93 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Freda B Runyon’s filings →

More from the funding graph