Skip to content

· Private foundation

Fred J Brunner Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
80
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$80k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$3.2MHuman Services$2.8MHealth$619kHousing & Shelter$500kReligion$355kRecreation & Sports$210kFood & Nutrition$190kCrime & Legal$90kOther$0
02FY2024 · 80 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k72 grants · $1.2M
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $330k
$15,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$32M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE SALVATION ARMY$80,000
PILLARS-CONSTANCE MORRIS HOUSE$75,000
ASPIRE$75,000
SABAN CENTER$50,000
CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT FUTURES$50,000
ST PATRICK HIGH SCHOOL$30,000
CHICAGO JESUIT ACADEMY$30,000
NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK$30,000
SAN MIGUEL SCHOOL$30,000
CHRIST THE KING COLLEGE PREP$30,000
CRISTO REY JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL$30,000
MISERICORDIA HEART OF MERCY$30,000
CLARE WOODS ACADEMY$25,000
MOTHER MC AULEY HIGH SCHOOL$25,000
COLORADO SCHOOL OF MINES$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $1.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%TURNING POINT: $10k → 6%LITTLE FRIENDS INC: $10k → 7%TURNING POINT: $10k → 6%TURNING POINT: $10k → 6%TURNING POINT: $10k → 6%LITTLE FRIENDS INC: $10k → 7%MUTUAL GROUND: $10k → 8%LITTLE FRIENDS INC: $10k → 7%MUTUAL GROUND: $10k → 8%MUTUAL GROUND: $10k → 8%SENIOR CARE VOLUNTEER WORK: $10k → 6%MUTUAL GROUND: $10k → 8%SENIOR CARE VOLUNTEER WORK: $10k → 6%MUTUAL GROUND: $10k → 8%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $10k → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $10k → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $10k → 14%ASPIRE: $100k → 14%CRISIS CENTER OF SO SUBURBIA: $10k → 14%ASPIRE: $100k → 14%CRISIS CENTER OF SO SUBURBIA: $10k → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $10k → 14%ASPIRE: $100k → 14%CRISIS CENTER OF SO SUBURBIA: $10k → 14%ASPIRE: $100k → 14%CRISIS CENTER OF SO SUBURBIA: $10k → 14%ASPIRE: $75k → 14%CRISIS CENTER OF SO SUBURBIA: $10k → 14%BETWEEN FRIENDS: $15k → 14%BETWEEN FRIENDS: $15k → 14%BETWEEN FRIENDS: $15k → 14%CASA CENTRAL: $10k → 14%CASA CENTRAL: $10k → 14%CASA CENTRAL: $10k → 14%NEW MOMS: $10k → 14%NEW MOMS: $10k → 14%NEW MOMS: $10k → 14%NEW MOMS: $10k → 14%ILLINOIS SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY INST: $10k → 14%ILLINOIS SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY INST: $10k → 14%ILLINOIS SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY INST: $10k → 14%ILLINOIS SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY INST: $10k → 14%CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT FUTURES: $65k → 14%CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT FUTURES: $50k → 14%CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT FUTURES: $50k → 14%CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT FUTURES: $50k → 14%SOUTHWEST CHICAGO PADS: $15k → 14%SOUTHWEST CHICAGO PADS: $15k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
NY
MA
SD
IA
PA
CO
MO
AZ
AR
AL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.1M · 103 repeat orgs$314k to everyone else

103 repeat relationships: 75 still active in FY2024, 28 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

103
7

Total granted

$8.1M
$229k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+36%

Still filing today

43%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $85k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationHousing & ShelterEmploymentFood & NutritionHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AO
    ASPIRE OF ILLINOIS
    5× · 2020–2024 · $475k · revenue +49%
  • NI
    NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK
    5× · 2020–2024 · $135k · revenue +8%
  • SM
    SAN MIGUEL FEBRES CORDERO SCHOOL INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $120k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • CT
    CRIMSON TIDE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $150k
  • VV
    VALLEY VIEW SCHOOL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $43k · revenue +36%
  • SJ
    ST JOSEPH HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rimland Services Nfp

Provide community-based residential housing to adults with autism and/or severe developmental disabilities. also provide developmental training and other supports to this same population.

Human Services
2
Depaul Community Services Inc

To provide residential and rehabilitation services to clients with mental illnesses

Health
3
Center for Housing and Health

Chh honors every person's right to a home and health care, by bridging the housing and health care systems, to improve the lives of chicagoans experiencing homelessness.

Housing & Shelter
4
Cornerstone Services Inc

The organization seeks to provide residential services for disabled adults and children, as well as behavioral health, regular work and supported employment services for these disabled individuals. additionally, developmental training and…

Human Services
5
Housing Opportunities and Maintenance for the Elderly Inc

Committed to improving the quality of life for chicago's low-income elderly, housing opportunities and maintenance for the elderly (h.o.m.e.) helps seniors remain independent and part of their community by offering opportunities for…

—
6
Mental Health Centers of Western Il

Provide mental health services.

Health
7
Illinois Presbyterian Home

Operate homes for the aged and to conduct charitable and benevolent enterprises

Human Services
8
Sinnissippi Centers Inc

It is the mission of sinnissippi centers, inc. to provide quality, coordinated and responsive behavioral healthcare services to individuals, families and the communities we serve.

Health
9
Respond Now

Respond now connects those in need with health, hunger, and housing services in the chicago southland.

Human Services
10
Progressive Housing Inc

To operate facilities throughout illinois for the long-term care of developmentally disabled residents in our intermediate care facilities and community integrated living arrangements.

Human Services
11
Goodwill Industries of Northern Il and Wi Stateline Area Inc

The mission of goodwill is to create opportunities for individuals with barriers to enhance their lives. barriers include physical or mental disabilities, lack of education and job preparation, socio-economic disadvantages, and others.…

—
12
Innovative Services Inc

Innovative services, inc. (isi) cares for those with disabilities, helping them lead fulfilling lives with maximum independence. innovative's vision is to be the most trusted care provider for people with disabilities in wisconsin.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Support Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is Meals On Wheels. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 115 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
46/47
Grantees still filing
37/47
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE SALVATION ARMY: $400,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYPILLARS-CONSTANCE MORRIS HOUSE: $375,000 · OtherPILLARS-CONSTANCE MORRIS HOUSE+78 more: $5,235,250 · Other+78 moreASPIRE OF ILLINOIS: $475,000 · Human ServicesASPIRE OF ILLINOISCENTER FOR INDEPENDENT FUTURES: $215,000 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR INDEPEN…SOUTHWEST CHICAGO HOMELESS SERVICES: $55,000 · Human ServicesMUTUAL GROUND INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesCrisis Center for South Suburbia: $50,000 · Human ServicesCOUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY: $50,000 · Human ServicesSISTERHOUSE: $50,000 · Human Services+11 more: $422,500 · Human Services+11 moreHADLEY INSTITUTE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED: $125,000 · EducationSAN MIGUEL FEBRES CORDERO SCHOOL INC: $120,000 · EducationBARTLETT LEARNING CENTER INC: $115,000 · EducationDUTCHESS DAY SCHOOL: $70,000 · EducationSAINT XAVIER UNIVERSITY: $65,000 · EducationMidtown-Metro Achievement Centers: $45,000 · EducationELIM CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $30,000 · EducationMERCY HOUSING LAKEFRONT: $55,000 · Housing & ShelterHome of the Sparrow Inc: $50,000 · Housing & ShelterHOUSING FORWARD: $45,000 · Housing & ShelterSARAH'S CIRCLE: $25,000 · Housing & ShelterNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK: $135,000 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON WHEELS: $25,000 · Food & NutritionTHE LAMBS FARM INC: $50,000 · EmploymentHAVE DREAMS: $45,000 · EmploymentRETURNING HOME INC: $10,000 · EmploymentOLIVERSOCCER FC: $60,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$6,010,250Human Services$1,367,500Education$570,000Housing & Shelter$175,000Food & Nutrition$160,000Employment$105,000Recreation & Sports$60,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetASPIRE OF ILLINOIS: $475,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetCENTER FOR INDEPENDENT FUTURES: $215,000 over 4y, 3.7% of budgetNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK: $135,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHADLEY INSTITUTE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED: $125,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetSAN MIGUEL FEBRES CORDERO SCHOOL INC: $120,000 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetBARTLETT LEARNING CENTER INC: $115,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetDUTCHESS DAY SCHOOL: $70,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetSAINT XAVIER UNIVERSITY: $65,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOLIVERSOCCER FC: $60,000 over 4y, 46% of budgetCHILDREN'S RESEARCH TRIANGLE: $60,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetMERCY HOUSING LAKEFRONT: $55,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHWEST CHICAGO HOMELESS SERVICES: $55,000 over 5y, 9.7% of budgetMUTUAL GROUND INC: $50,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetCrisis Center for South Suburbia: $50,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTHE LAMBS FARM INC: $50,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCOUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY: $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHome of the Sparrow Inc: $50,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetSISTERHOUSE: $50,000 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetSENIOR CARE VOLUNTEER NETWORK: $45,500 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetHOUSING FORWARD: $45,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetDISABLED PATRIOT FUND INC: $45,000 over 5y, 7.8% of budgetHAVE DREAMS: $45,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetBETWEEN FRIENDS: $45,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetNEW MOMS INC: $45,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetMidtown-Metro Achievement Centers: $45,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetTHE NIGHT MINISTRY: $45,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetOperation Warm Inc: $44,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTurning Point Inc: $43,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetVALLEY VIEW SCHOOL INC: $42,500 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetHOOPESTON MULTI AGENCY SERVICE: $41,000 over 5y, 4.3% of budgetILLINOIS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE: $40,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetDANIEL MURPHY SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $40,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetBEDS PLUS INC: $35,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetLITTLE FRIENDS INC: $35,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCASA CENTRAL SOCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMON PANTRY: $30,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY SUPPORT SERVICES INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetELIM CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFOX VALLEY HANDS OF HOPE INC: $30,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetNORWOOD LIFE CARE FOUNDATION- B: $27,500 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetLINCOLN PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSARAH'S CIRCLE: $25,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL: $23,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHoward Area Community Center: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBETTER GOVERNMENT ASSOCIATION INC: $20,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetRETURNING HOME INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ASPIRE OF ILLINOIS ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT FUTURES ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds HADLEY INSTITUTE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED ↗
  • Who funds SAN MIGUEL FEBRES CORDERO SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds BARTLETT LEARNING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds DUTCHESS DAY SCHOOL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

WP & HB White FoundationIL38.7× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: WP & HB White Foundation · George M Eisenberg Foundation for Charities · The Chicago Community Trust · Circle of Service Foundation · Helen V Brach Foundation · Blowitz-Ridgeway Foundation · Andrew and Alice Fischer Charitable Trust · The a Montgomery Ward Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · The Dupage Community Foundation · Irish Fellowship Educational & Cultural Foundation · AbbVie Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fred J Brunner Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fred J Brunner Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    19report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Fred J Brunner Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Fred J Brunner Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 115 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Fred J Brunner’s filings →

    More from the funding graph