· Private foundation
Frank M Halley Charitable Trust
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k14 grants · $295k
- $50k–250k7 grants · $980k
- $250k+1 grant · $325k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LIFE COVENANT CHURCH | $325,000 |
| FUSION BIBLE CHURCH | $220,000 |
| COOK CHILDRENS HEALTH FOUNDATION | $210,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA | $200,000 |
| KANAKUK INSTITUTE | $150,000 |
| SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED | $100,000 |
| WOMEN ROCK | $50,000 |
| DURANT CHURCH OF CHRIST | $50,000 |
| TEXAS LARYNGECTOMEE ASSOCIATION | $40,000 |
| KLIFE MINISTRIES | $30,000 |
| HEALED IN MERCY | $25,000 |
| UNDER HIS WINGS | $25,000 |
| ACCEPTABLE GIFT | $25,000 |
| SCOTT CARTER FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| ENTOURAGE MINISTRIES | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of -6% since the first grant, against -23% for the ones you funded once.
6 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 42% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $935k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LCLIFE COVENANT CHURCH INC2× · 2022–2024 · $425k
- FBFUSION BIBLE CHURCH INCORPORATED2× · 2022–2024 · $320k
- TLTexas Laryngectomee Association2× · 2022–2024 · $65k
Funded once
- UOUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue -114%
- SMSPINAL MUSCULAR ATROPHY FOUNDATIONone grant, 2022 · $75k · revenue -23%
- DNDAVID NICKLAS ORGAN DONOR AWARENESSone grant, 2022 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ
Christian university campus ministry both inside & outside of the united states. provides worship, biblical teaching, training & mission opportunities. provides audio & visual materials to support the ministry.
Preaching the message of Jesus Christ around the world through large events.
Travel throughout the united states and foreign countries spreading gospel of jesus christ through teaching, music and training. support and encouragement of local ministries. training and discipleship of students through long term…
The exempt purpose is charitable, religious and educational. to equip the saints for the work of ministry. the desire is to minister to the needs of others whatever they are.
The mission of Praying Through ministries is to deliver gospel hope to families navigating dark seasons of pregnancy, childhood illness, hospitalization, and/or child loss (miscarriage, stillbirth, infant loss, and child loss of any age)…
A training ministry that equips the saints more focusing on preparing leaders and ministers of the word for the work of ministry to the building up of the body of Christ.
To instill hope through jesus christ by providing essentials and spiritual support to the less fortunate globally, with a primary focus on orphans and widowns. our goal is to ensure the gospel reaches everyone, regardless of their…
To give the gospel of Jesus Christ of Nazareth to the poor and dejected of the world. We do this by caring for widows, orphans, and broken people around the world. We care for hem by feeding, clothing, and encouraging them in Jesus by His…
Foreknown Ministries (FM) will operate programs that empower mothers and fathers to find healing after pregnancy or infant loss. In the US, approximately 1 in 100 pregnancies end in stillbirth (after 20 weeks). The experience is often…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Oklahoma Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Spinal Muscular Atrophy Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE KANAKUK INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SPINAL MUSCULAR ATROPHY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Texas Laryngectomee Association ↗
- Who funds WOMEN ROCK INC ↗
- Who funds WAGNER MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds SCOTT CARTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ENTOURAGE MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds HEALED IN MERCY ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Under His Wings ↗
- Who funds ACCEPTABLE GIFT INC ↗
- Who funds OLIVE BRANCH MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds FAMILIES FEEDING HOPE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds J127 Ministry Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Frank M Halley Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.