Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Frank & Fay Katlin Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$60k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Philanthropy$256kArts & Culture$87kReligion$63kInternational$22kYouth Development$16kCivil Rights$15kHuman Services$11kHealth$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$713k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
US HOLOCAUST MUSEUM$20,000
Friends of the Israel Defense Force$10,000
ZAKA$10,000
Illinois Holocaust Museum$10,000
Northfield Township Food Pantry$5,000
Planned Parenthood$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Israel Guide Dog Center: $100 → 6%Wounded Warrior Project: $100 → 14%Downtown Women's Center: $100 → 14%Jewish Child and Family Services: $5k → 14%Jewish Child and Family Services: $5k → 14%Jewish Child and Family Services: $250 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
WI
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CA
NE
MO
WV
VA
TN
DC
AL
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$429k · 20 repeat orgs$64k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +78% since the first grant, against +33% for the ones you funded once.

20 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
24

Total granted

$429k
$29k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+78%
+33%

Still filing today

40%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 42% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHuman ServicesHealthFood & NutritionArts & CultureRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TU
    The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum
    6× · 2018–2024 · $76k · revenue +16%
  • JC
    Jewish Child and Family Services
    3× · 2018–2022 · $10k · revenue +35%
  • NT
    NORTHFIELD TOWNSHIP FOOD PANTRY
    2× · 2017–2024 · $5k · revenue +233%

Funded once

  • O
    ORT
    one grant, 2022 · $7k
  • SP
    SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -12%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +1%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
2
Us Middle East Project Inc

The organization's mission is to engage in non partisan analysis of u.s. foreign policy in the middle east, with special emphasis on the middle east peace process, and to present policymakers in the united states, in the region and in the…

International
3
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
4
Hadassah the Women's Zionist Org of America Inc

Hadassah, the women's zionist organization of america, inc., a new york not-for-profit corporation ("hwzoa") enhances the health and lives of people in israel, the united states and worldwide through education, advocacy, women's…

Community Improvement
5
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
6
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

7
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
8
Jewish United Fund of Metropolitan Chicago

Juf provides critical resources that bring food, refuge, health care, education and emergency assistance to over 500,000 chicagoans of all faiths and millions of jews in israel and around the world, funding a network of 100+ agencies,…

Philanthropy
9
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
10
National Jewish Health

National Jewish Health's mission since 1899 is to heal, discover and educate as a preeminent healthcare institution. We serve by providing the best integrated and innovative care for patients and their families; by understanding and…

Health
11
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
12
Jewish Community Relations Council of New York

Jcrc-ny builds relationships to advance the values, interests and security of the new york jewish community and to create a more interconnected new york for all.

Civil Rights

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Jude Children's Research Hospital Inc and the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyJewish Community FederationsLegal Aid & Immigration Ser…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Veteran Support ServicesLand Conservation Organizat…Animal Rescue and AdoptionFood Pantries & AssistanceCommunity FoundationsChristian Missionary Organi…Cancer Support Organizations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%0%<5yr13%4%5–10yr18%4%10–20yr15%30%20–35yr14%37%35–55yr22%26%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%0%<5yr13%4%5–10yr18%0%10–20yr15%16%20–35yr14%66%35–55yr22%14%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/28
the rest of the field
12%
8,891/72,331

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
22/25
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JEWISH UNITED FUND OF CHG — $253,477 · OtherJEWISH UNITED FUND OF CHGChabad of Rancho Mirage — $24,500 · OtherChabad of Rancho MirageCHABAD SYNAGOGUE — $18,818 · Other+32 more — $73,225 · Other+32 moreThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum — $76,150 · Arts & CultureThe United States…+1 more — $378 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $10,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $5,000 · InternationalISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE — $2,750 · InternationalJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $2,000 · InternationalThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc — $2,000 · InternationalOPERATION SMILE INC — $1,700 · InternationalJewish Child and Family Services — $10,250 · Human Services+3 more — $300 · Human ServicesNORTHFIELD TOWNSHIP FOOD PANTRY — $5,100 · Food & NutritionGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY — $600 · Food & NutritionSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC — $5,000 · Crime & LegalCHAMPS MALE MENTORING PROGRAM - CHIRISE — $5,000 · Education
Other$370,020Arts & Culture$76,528International$23,450Human Services$10,550Food & Nutrition$5,700Crime & Legal$5,000Education$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum — $76,150 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Child and Family Services — $10,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHFIELD TOWNSHIP FOOD PANTRY — $5,100 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHAMPS MALE MENTORING PROGRAM - CHIRISE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE — $2,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRAXA Research Foundation Inc — $2,300 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC — $1,700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM SPRINGS AND DESERT AREA — $1,130 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $900 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY — $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL YIDDISH BOOK CENTER INC — $378 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP RAINBOW FOUNDATION — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNT MARY UNIVERSITY INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum
  • Who funds Jewish Child and Family Services
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES
  • Who funds NORTHFIELD TOWNSHIP FOOD PANTRY
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
  • Who funds CHAMPS MALE MENTORING PROGRAM - CHIRISE
  • Who funds ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE
  • Who funds FRAXA Research Foundation Inc
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC
  • Who funds The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc
  • Who funds OPERATION SMILE INC
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM SPRINGS AND DESERT AREA
  • Who funds DESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY
  • Who funds NATIONAL YIDDISH BOOK CENTER INC
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds CAMP RAINBOW FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA8.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Frank & Fay Katlin Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc7% of income from government
  • National Yiddish Book Center Inc2% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph