Skip to content
Frances Pew Hayes Family Fdn Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Frances Pew Hayes Family Fdn Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$235k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$776kEducation$565kHuman Services$242kYouth Development$100kHousing & Shelter$43kReligion$40kArts & Culture$22kFood & Nutrition$16kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $180k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$20,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$5.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FURMAN UNIVERSITY$50,000
FIRST NAPLES CHURCH$25,000
EMPOWER$25,000
DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTIT$25,000
ST MATTHEW'S HOUSE$22,500
CYSTIC FIBROSIS FDN$20,000
FIRST NAPLES CHURCH$15,000
CAIDEN'S CRUSADERS INC$12,500
NAPLES THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER$12,500
OUR NEIGHBORS TABLE$12,500
EMPTY BOWLS NAPLES INC$10,000
BABY BASICS OF COLLIER COUNTY INC$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $485k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 64% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%EMPOWER HER: $25k → 8%JEAN GEIGER CRISIS CENTER: $20k → 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF VENIC: $1k → 9%EMPOWER: $25k → 8%EMPOWER HER: $25k → 8%OUR NEIGHBORS TABLE: $13k → 10%EMPOWER HER: $25k → 8%EMPOWER HER: $25k → 8%OUR NEIGHBORS TABLE: $1k → 10%EMPOWER HER: $25k → 8%EMPOWER HER: $25k → 8%BABY BASICS OF COLLIER COUNTY INC: $5k → 10%AVOW HOSPICE: $50k → 10%AVOW HOSPICE: $50k → 10%AVOW HOSPICE: $50k → 10%AVOW HOSPICE: $50k → 10%AVOW HOSPICE: $50k → 10%AVOW HOSPICE: $20k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 15 repeat orgs$292k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
12

Total granted

$1.5M
$150k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+45%

Still filing today

47%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $143k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHealthArts & CultureHousing & ShelterPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AH
    AVOW Hospice Inc
    6× · 2018–2023 · $270k · revenue +54%
  • TR
    THE RIVERS SCHOOL CORPORATION
    6× · 2018–2023 · $260k · revenue +16%
  • EG
    EMPOWER GRIEVING CHILDREN INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $175k · revenue +130%

Funded once

  • FN
    FIRST NAPLES CHURCH WITH EDEN
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
  • JG
    JEAN GEIGER CIRSIS CENTER
    one grant, 2018 · $20k
  • TN
    THE NAPLES PLAYERS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue +106%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Florida Health Corporation

UF Health's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across the spectrum of basic,…

—
2
Pediatric Specialty Group Inc

Pediatric specialty group, inc. (d/b/a nicklaus children's pediatric specialists ("ncps")) is a physician-directed, multi-specialty pediatric group with a regional, national, and international presence in providing pediatric-centric care…

—
3
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
4
Naples Zoo Inc

Naples zoo is accredited by the american zoo & aquarium association (aza) and has numerous animal exhibits placed on its 45-acre site. (continued on schedule o)each exhibit is unique and designed to simulate typical conditions for the…

Animals
5
The Hospice of the Florida Suncoast Inc

Suncoast hospice's mission is to be the center to improve life for those touched by advanced illness, death, dying, grief, bereavement and other end-of-life issues.

Human Services
6
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
7
Hospice of the Treasure Coast Inc

Hospice of the treasure coast, inc. exists to provide hospice, grief counseling, education and other services to patients and families dealing with death and dying so that they might live as fully and comfortably as possible.

—
8
The Hospice Institute of the Florida Suncoast Inc

Suncoast hospice institute is now inactive.

—
9
Catholic Palliative Care Services Inc

Catholic palliative care services, inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of catholic hospice, inc. and under the sponsorship of the archdiocese of miami, provides responsive end-of-life care to patients and families in broward and dade…

—
10
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
11
Mcphs University

Mcphs university prepares students for careers in health care through teaching, scholarship, research, professional service and community engagement.

Education
12
Hospice of Okeechobee Inc

Hospice of Okeechobee, Inc. provides hospice services that relieve the suffering of persons residing in its communities affected by life-limiting illnesses and end-of-life issues so all may live as fully and comfortably as possible.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Avow Hospice Inc; the most unlike its peers is Caidens Crusaders Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
14/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE RIVERS SCHOOL CORPORATION: $260,000 · OtherTHE RIVERS SCHOOL CORPORATIONDANA-FARBER CANCER INSTIT: $225,000 · OtherDANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITCYSTIC FIBROSIS FDN: $190,000 · OtherCYSTIC FIBROSIS FDNRFK'S CHILDREN'S ACTION CORPS: $100,000 · OtherRFK'S CHILDREN'S ACTION CORPSFIRST NAPLES CHURCH: $40,000 · OtherSHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN: $35,000 · Other+10 more: $140,000 · Other+10 moreAVOW Hospice Inc: $270,000 · Human ServicesAVOW Hospice IncEMPOWER GRIEVING CHILDREN INC: $175,000 · Human ServicesEMPOWER GRIEVING CHILDREN INCJEANNE GEIGER CRISIS CENTER INC: $20,000 · Human Services+3 more: $19,500 · Human ServicesTHE PHELPS SCHOOL: $200,000 · EducationTHE PHELPS SCHOO…FURMAN UNIVERSITY: $50,000 · EducationFURMAN UNIVERSIT…University of South Florida Foundation Inc: $10,000 · Education+1 more: $5,000 · EducationNaples Therapeutic Riding Center Inc: $12,500 · HealthCaidens Crusaders Inc: $12,500 · HealthChildren's Hospital Corporation: $6,000 · HealthST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC: $22,500 · Housing & ShelterTHE NAPLES PLAYERS INC: $20,000 · Arts & CultureApple Tree Arts Inc: $1,500 · Arts & CultureEmpty Bowls of Naples Inc: $11,000 · Public Benefit
Other$990,000Human Services$484,500Education$265,000Health$31,000Housing & Shelter$22,500Arts & Culture$21,500Public Benefit$11,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAVOW Hospice Inc: $270,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetTHE RIVERS SCHOOL CORPORATION: $260,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PHELPS SCHOOL: $200,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetEMPOWER GRIEVING CHILDREN INC: $175,000 over 7y, 6.8% of budgetFURMAN UNIVERSITY: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC: $22,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJEANNE GEIGER CRISIS CENTER INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOur Neighbors' Table Inc: $13,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCaidens Crusaders Inc: $12,500 over 1y, 20% of budgetEmpty Bowls of Naples Inc: $11,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetTHE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of South Florida Foundation Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFLOWER ANGELS USA INC: $6,000 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCatching the Dream: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetApple Tree Arts Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF VENICE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Collier Community Fou…Boston Foundation IncThe Bank of America C…American Endowment Fo…National Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…Network for GoodAmerican Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Collier Community Foundation IncFL13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Collier Community Foundation Inc · Boston Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Frances Pew Hayes Family Fdn Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Frances Pew Hayes Family Fdn Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Jeanne Geiger Crisis Center Inc: 40% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation: 10% of income from government
  • Our Neighbors' Table Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Avow Hospice Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Frances Pew Hayes Family Fdn’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home