· Public charity
Fox Valley United Way
To improve lives in the communities served through fundraising and by providing leadership in fostering collaberation and leveraging resources to focus on solving the identified community problems.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 1 grants below total $5,250 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $68,048 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $62,798 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MARIE WILKINSON CHILD DEVELP CENTER | $5,250 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $671k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 13% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +71% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.
34 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 33 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PAPUBLIC ACTION TO DELIVER SHELTER INC D/B/A HESED HOUSE7× · 2017–2024 · $170k · revenue +139%
- MGMUTUAL GROUND INC8× · 2017–2024 · $129k · revenue +105%
- TFTRICITY FAMILY SERVICES8× · 2017–2024 · $116k · revenue +86%
Funded once
- MFMetropolitan Family Servicesgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $90k · revenue +196%
- COCITY OF AURORAone grant, 2017 · $15k
- ECELDERDAY CENTERgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $11k · revenue +66%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To foster stronger communities by providing individuals with accessible, professional counseling and mental health care that empowers them to thrive
Administering an array of critical, intensive therapeutic interventions and/or facilitation services to emotionally and behaviorally disturbed clients for whom DCFS is legally responsible in order to stabilize their traditional or home of…
The chicago children's advocacy center unites public, private, and community partners to ensure the safety, health, and well-being of abused children.
To assist children who have been victims of abuse
Our mission is to provide community-centered mental health services that empower individuals and families to build resilience and lead lives filled with meaning, connection, and hope.
Lutheran social services of illinois, through service and advocacy seeks to bring healing, justice and wholeness to persons and to enhance the quality of people's lives.
It is the mission of sinnissippi centers, inc. to provide quality, coordinated and responsive behavioral healthcare services to individuals, families and the communities we serve.
To provide comprehensive outpatient mental health services to over 5400 individuals and their families in a consumer driven person centered delivery system. Approximately 15% of our staff members are our clients who are involved in a…
To provide professional counseling and support services to individuals, children and families to improve the quality of their life at home and in the community
Provide mental health services.
Family service and guidance center provides quality behavioral healthcare to children and families. vision: family service and guidance center shall be the premier, outcomes-focused children and family behavioral healthcare center that…
We inspire hope and well-being for people of all ages by providing counseling, education and support.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Counseling Service of Aurora and the most unlike its peers is The Salvation Army World Service Office. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE FOX RIVER VALLEY ↗
- Who funds PUBLIC ACTION TO DELIVER SHELTER INC D/B/A HESED HOUSE ↗
- Who funds MUTUAL GROUND INC ↗
- Who funds TRICITY FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds VNA Health Care ↗
- Who funds Metropolitan Family Services ↗
- Who funds AURORA AREA INTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY ↗
- Who funds MARIE WILKINSON CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER ↗
- Who funds Fox Valley Family YMCA Inc ↗
- Who funds THE SALVATION ARMY WORLD SERVICE OFFICE ↗
- Who funds SENIOR SERVICES ASSOCIATES INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD EVANGELICAL ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds LAZARUS HOUSE ↗
- Who funds BREAKING FREE INC ↗
- Who funds MARIE WILKINSON FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY BENEFITS INC ↗
- Who funds EASTER SEALS DUPAGE & THE FOX VALLEY REGION ↗
- Who funds FAMILY FOCUS LEGACY ↗
- Who funds THE NEIGHBOR PROJECT ↗
- Who funds RENZ ADDICTION COUNSELING CENTER ↗
- Who funds SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY INTERACTIVE CENTER Scitech Fox Valley STEM Programs ↗
- Who funds ECKER CENTER FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY COUNSELING SERVICE OF AURORA ↗
- Who funds HOPE FOR TOMORROW INC ↗
- Who funds RITAS MINISTRY ↗
- Who funds TRI CITY HEALTH PARTNERSHIP ↗
- Who funds AURORA AREA AFRICAN AMERICAN MEN OF UNITY ↗
- Who funds CASA KANE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS ↗
- Who funds FOX VALLEY HANDS OF HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds ELDERDAY CENTER ↗
- Who funds MAKING KANE COUNTY FIT FOR KIDS ↗
- Who funds LITERACY VOLUNTEERS FOX VALLEY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Fox River Valley · The Bersted Foundation · Dunham Fund · Northwestern Memorial HealthCare Group · Inc Mental Health Alliance · Dunham Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · Shodeen Family Foundation · Juvenile Protective Association of Aurora Illinois · McGowan Gin Rosica Family Foundation Inc · The Dupage Community Foundation · Efs Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Fox Valley United Way funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.