Skip to content

· Public charity

Forward Together

Forward Together is a national reproductive justice organization that centers people, families, and communities who experience reproductive oppression.

$117k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$22k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Civil Rights$892kPublic Benefit$96kArts & Culture$42kHuman Services$23kHealth$23kCrime & Legal$7kCommunity Improvement$7k
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $22,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $116,750 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $94,750 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$22,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PROG NOW NEW MEX EDU FUND$22,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $902k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 4% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Forward Together Action: $400k → 10%NM Asian Family Center: $9k → 14%Sister Song: $6k → 13%Forward Together Action: $300k → 10%NM Asian Family Center: $7k → 14%Forward Together Action: $170k → 10%Young Women United: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$994k · 4 repeat orgs$83k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +241% since the first grant, against +177% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
7

Total granted

$994k
$61k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+241%
+177%

Still filing today

100%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesCrime & LegalArts & CultureEnvironmentCivil RightsHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FR
    FAITH ROOTS REPRODUCTIVE ACTION
    2× · 2017–2018 · $70k · revenue ×11 · 33% of their budget
  • CENTER OF SOUTHWEST CULTURE INC
    2× · 2021–2023 · $30k · revenue +241%
  • NM
    NEW MEXICO ASIAN FAMILY CENTER
    3× · 2018–2022 · $24k · revenue +99%

Funded once

  • JA
    JUSTICE ACCESS SUPPORT AND SOLUTIONS FOR HEALTHgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue +42%
  • BF
    BOLD FUTURES NMgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +64%
  • SA
    SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +326%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
El Centro De Igualdad Y Derechos

El centro de igualdad y derechos is a civil rights and workers justice organization based in central new mexico that combines organizing, leadership development, information campaigns, and policy education.

Human Services
2
La Raza Centro Legal - San Francisco

La Raza Centro Legal San Francisco provides high quality, highly trusted, free legal services to low-income or immigrant clients in the San Francisco Bay Area.

—
3
Law Access New Mexico

Provide respectful high quality legal advice, counsel, brief services and referral to low-income New Mexicans and help remove barriers to the civil justice system.

—
4
Colectiva Legal Del Pueblo

Colectiva Legal del Pueblo is a non-hierarchal collective organization founded for and by undocumented immigrants working to build community leadership and power for migrant justice through legal services, advocacy and education.

Civil Rights
5
National Latina Institute for Reproductive Justice

We demand health, dignity, and justice for our communities. We center and amplify Latine voices as we work to transform oppressive systems and narratives and to reclaim control over our bodies and lives. We build power by organizing our…

Health
6
Forward Together

Forward Together is a national reproductive justice organization that centers people, families, and communities who experience reproductive oppression. They prioritize queer, trans, Black, Indigenous, and other peoples of color and utilize…

Health
7
Southwest Women's Law Center

To advance the health, safety, social, education, & economic interest and needs of women and girls in new mexico and throughout the southwestern united states through research, education, training, advocacy & litigation.

Civil Rights
8
Casa Latina

Our mission is to advance the power and well-being of latinx immigrants through employment, education, and community organizing.

Education
9
Fuerza LaboralPower of Workers

Fuerza Laboral is a workers' rights center whose mission is to shift the balance of power in our economy in favor of workers by educating, training, and organizing workers to become community leaders; taking direct action to recover unpaid…

Education
10
Southern California Immigration Project

Southern California Immigration Project is a public interest nonprofit organization dedicated to providing pro bono legal services to survivors of human and civil rights violations.

International
11
Casa Fortaleza

Casa fortaleza provides advocacy, case management services, therapy, and outreach to victims/survivors of sexual violence.

Health
12
Somos Un Pueblo Unido

To provide educational resources and information to immigrants and low- wage workers in new mexico regarding rights, protections, and remedies; develop and implement strategies to protect immigrants' civil and human rights; and organize…

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs (See) Inc; the most unlike its peers is Justice Access Support and Solutions for Health. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
11/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FORWARD TOGETHER ACTION: $870,000 · Human ServicesFORWARD TOGETHER ACTIONFAITH ROOTS REPRODUCTIVE ACTION: $70,000 · Human ServicesFAITH ROOTS REPRODUCTIVE ACTION+3 more: $39,500 · Human ServicesCENTER OF SOUTHWEST CULTURE INC: $30,000 · Arts & CulturePROGRESSNOW NEW MEXICO EDUCATION FUND: $22,000 · Civil RightsJUSTICE ACCESS SUPPORT AND SOLUTIONS FOR HEALTH: $15,000 · HealthNM0200 SANTA FE NOW: $6,800 · Other9TO5 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF WORKING WOMEN INC: $6,500 · OtherSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $12,000 · EducationSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC: $10,000 · EnvironmentCENTRO LEGAL DE LA RAZA: $7,000 · Crime & Legal
Human Services$979,500Arts & Culture$30,000Civil Rights$22,000Health$15,000Other$13,300Education$12,000Environment$10,000Crime & Legal$7,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFORWARD TOGETHER ACTION: $870,000 over 3y, 59% of budgetFAITH ROOTS REPRODUCTIVE ACTION: $70,000 over 2y, 33% of budgetCENTER OF SOUTHWEST CULTURE INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetNEW MEXICO ASIAN FAMILY CENTER: $23,500 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetPROGRESSNOW NEW MEXICO EDUCATION FUND: $22,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetJUSTICE ACCESS SUPPORT AND SOLUTIONS FOR HEALTH: $15,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOLD FUTURES NM: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRO LEGAL DE LA RAZA: $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSISTERSONG INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Santa Fe Community FoundationNM17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Santa Fe Community Foundation · New Mexico Fund for Women and Girls · Groundswell Fund · Albuquerque Community Foundation · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Center for Civic Policy · The Susan Thompson Buffett Foundation · Marshall L and Perrine D McCune Charitable Foundation Inc · NEO Philanthropy Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · WK Kellogg Foundation · Tides Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Forward Together funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Forward Together. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Forward Together?

    Find your warmest path to Forward Together through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Forward Together’s filings →

    More from the funding graph