Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Forward Arts Foundation Inc

To provide support to the visual arts in the atlanta, ga area.

$245k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Arts & Culture$1.4MEnvironment$70kCommunity Improvement$30kEducation$10k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 4 grants below total $240,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $245,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $5,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $40k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $200k
$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$8.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MICHAEL C CARLOS MUSEUM$150,000
ERNEST G WELCH SCHOOL OF ART AND DESIGN$50,000
ATLANTA BELTLINE PARTNERSHIP$30,000
ATLANTA CENTER FOR PHOTOGRAPHY$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 97% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BOOTH WESTERN ART MUSEUM IN ASSOCIATION WITH THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $25k → 10%BLUE HERON NATURE PRESERVE INC: $20k → 13%AGNES SCOTT COLLEGE: $10k → 14%GEORGIA MUSEUM OF ART: $50k → 27%BOOTH WESTERN ART MUSEUM IN ASSOCIATION WITH THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $25k → 10%ATLANTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $15k → 13%MICHAEL C CARLOS MUSEUM: $150k → 14%Georgia Museum of Art University of Georgia Foundation: $25k → 27%HIGH MUSEUM OF ARTS THE WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER: $500k → 13%Michael C Carlos Museum Emory University: $50k → 14%GEORGIA MUSEUM OF ARTUNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION: $25k → 27%HIGH MUSEUM OF ART: $100k → 13%MICHAEL C CARLOS MUSEUM EMORY UNIVERSITY: $50k → 14%HIGH MUSEUM OF ART THE WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER: $100k → 13%OGLETHORPE UNIVERSITY MUSEUM OF ART: $25k → 14%ATLANTA BOTANICAL GARDENS: $50k → 13%DASHBOARD CO-OP INC: $10k → 14%Museum of Contemporary Art of Atlanta: $20k → 13%THE MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART OF GEORGIA INC: $20k → 13%GEORGIA COMMITTEE OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM OF WOMEN IN THE ARTS INC: $15k → 13%HIGH MUSEUM OF ART: $14k → 13%ATLANTA BELTLINE PARTNERSHIP: $30k → 13%ATLANTA CONTEMPORARY ART CENTER: $25k → 13%ATLANTA CONTEMPORARY ART CENTER: $20k → 13%ATLANTA CONTEMPORARY ART CENTER: $15k → 13%ATLANTA CONTEMPORARY ART CENTER: $10k → 13%Atlanta Contemporary Art Center: $10k → 13%ATLANTA CENTER FOR PHOTOGRAPHY: $10k → 13%Arts Critic Atl Inc (ArtsAtl): $5k → 13%ERNEST G WELCH SCHOOL OF ART AND DESIGN: $50k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 36% of Forward Arts Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in GA; read by stated purpose it is 64% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Forward Arts Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.1M · 6 repeat orgs$390k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +80% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
8

Total granted

$1.1M
$150k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+80%
+7%

Still filing today

100%
88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $240k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEnvironmentEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RW
    ROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC
    5× · 2018–2024 · $714k · revenue +54%
  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION
    3× · 2017–2022 · $100k · revenue +112%
  • EU
    Emory University
    2× · 2017–2020 · $100k · revenue +80%

Funded once

  • TA
    THE ATLANTA BOTANICAL GARDEN INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $50k · revenue +194%
  • OU
    OGLETHORPE UNIVERSITY MUSEUM OF ART
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
  • BH
    BLUE HERON NATURE PRESERVE INC
    one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue +7%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The African Diasporic Art Museum of Atlanta Inc

to showcase contemporary art and culture of the African Diaspora

Arts & Culture
2
Berggruen Institute
Education
3
Savannah College of Art and DesignInc

Scad prepares talented students for creative professions through engaged teaching and learning in a positively oriented university environment.

Education
4
Baltimore Museum of Art

The baltimore museum of art connects art to baltimore and baltimore to the world, embodying a commitment to artistic excellence and social equity in every decision from art presentation, interpretation, and collecting, to the composition…

Arts & Culture
5
The Brooklyn Institute of Arts and Sciences

The mission of the brooklyn institute of arts and sciences, d/b/a brooklyn museum (the "museum") is to bring people together through art and experiences that inspire celebration, compassion, courage, and the will to act. (see schedule o).

Arts & Culture
6
Mint Inc

Mint's mission is to make atlanta a destination for the arts: a cultural hub where artists thrive, patrons experience transformative work, and communities are activated and engaged.

7
Mint Museum of Art Inc

The mint museum welcomes all to be inspired and transformed through the power of art and creativity.

Arts & Culture
8
Kadist Collection Manager Inc
Arts & Culture
9
Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum Inc

Organization's mission statement true to the ambitious vision of its founder and her spirit of creative risk-taking, the mission of the isabella stewart gardner museum is: - to bring to life and preserve the rich historic collection; - to…

Arts & Culture
10
Arnot Art Museum

The arnot art museum is an exhibiting and collecting fine arts museum, accredited by the american association of museums. the museum exhibits its permanent collection of 17th-19th century european paintings and sculpture; 19th century…

Arts & Culture
11
Flux Projects Inc

Commissioning public art that invites audiences in atlanta to explore the citys sites and stories as a means to imagining its future possibilities.

Arts & Culture
12
Metropolitan Museum of Art

The metropolitan museum of art collects, studies, conserves, and presents significant works of art across all times and cultures in order to connect people to creativity, knowledge, and ideas.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Atlanta Historical Society Inc and the most unlike its peers is Blue Heron Nature Preserve Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
11/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC — $714,300 · Arts & CultureROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INCATLANTA CONTEMPORY ART CENTER INC — $80,000 · Arts & CultureATLANTA CONTEMPORY ART CENTER INCSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION — $50,000 · Arts & CultureTHE MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART OF GEORGIA INC — $40,000 · Arts & Culture+3 more — $55,000 · Arts & Culture+3 moreMICHAEL C CARLOS MUSEUM — $150,000 · OtherMICHAEL C CARLOS MUS…ERNEST G WELCH SCHOOL OF ART AND DESIGN — $50,000 · OtherERNEST G WELCH SCHOO…OGLETHORPE UNIVERSITY MUSEUM OF ART — $25,000 · OtherOGLETHORPE UNIVERSIT…GEORGIA COMMITTEE OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM OF WOMEN — $15,000 · OtherGEORGIA COMMITTEE OF…Agnes Scott College — $10,000 · OtherATLANTA CENTER FOR PHOTOGRAPHY — $10,000 · Other+1 more — $5,000 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION — $100,000 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY …Emory University — $100,000 · EducationEmory Universit…THE ATLANTA BOTANICAL GARDEN INC — $50,000 · EnvironmentBLUE HERON NATURE PRESERVE INC — $20,000 · Environment
Arts & Culture$939,300Other$265,000Education$200,000Environment$70,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC — $714,300 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEmory University — $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetATLANTA CONTEMPORY ART CENTER INC — $80,000 over 5y, 4.9% of budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION — $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ATLANTA BOTANICAL GARDEN INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART OF GEORGIA INC — $40,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetATLANTA BELTLINE PARTNERSHIP INC — $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBLUE HERON NATURE PRESERVE INC — $20,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetATLANTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGIA COMMITTEE OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM OF WOMEN — $15,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetDASHBOARD CO-OP INC — $10,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetAgnes Scott College — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARTS CRITIC ATL INC — $5,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta IncGA17.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · Tim & Lauren Schrager Family Foundation · The Imlay Foundation Inc · The Arthur M Blank Family Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Forward Arts Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph