Skip to content

· Private foundation

Fortress Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$70k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$282kYouth Development$60kHealth$59kHousing & Shelter$33kFood & Nutrition$26kHuman Services$15kEmployment$8kRecreation & Sports$7kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $50k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Young Life$20,000
111 Project$7,500
Alternative Pregnancy Center$7,500
CRU - Campus Crusade for Christ$5,000
Open Door Ministries$5,000
Our Neighborhood Empowered$5,000
Food & Shelter for Friends$5,000
Spero Project$5,000
Calvary Family Churches$5,000
City Care Homeless Service Project$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Sunhive Collective Inc: $6k → 13%WILLOW SPRINGS BOYS RANCH: $4k → 15%SUN HIVE COLLECTIVE INC: $3k → 13%WILLOW SPRINGS BOYS RANCH: $1k → 15%Willow Springs Boys Ranch: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$471k · 19 repeat orgs$22k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
6

Total granted

$471k
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+67%

Still filing today

42%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentHealthReligionRecreation & SportsEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YL
    YOUNG LIFE
    3× · 2017–2024 · $60k · revenue +59%
  • 1I
    111Project Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $55k · revenue ×21
  • AP
    Alternatives Pregnancy Center Inc
    5× · 2020–2024 · $43k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • SS
    SHILOH SUMMER CAMP INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $4k · revenue +67%
  • YL
    YOUNG LIFE - CLEARWATER COVE
    one grant, 2018 · $4k
  • YL
    YOUNG LIFE - CIM REGION
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Life International

To partner with leaders globally to boldly proclaim the biblical truth of the father's heart for life, champion the gospel of jesus christ, and establish life-giving ministries.

Health
2
Orphan Outreach

To glorify the Lord Jesus Christ by ministering to orphans around the world by meeting spiritual, physical, emotional, and educational needs.

International
3
Redeem International

Redeem's mission is to protect widows and orphans from violent abuse and exploitation.

International
4
Life Network

Life Network provides support and mentoring to women and men facing unexpected pregnancies; offers parenting support, material resources, and referrals; and promotes sexual risk avoidance through education to foster a culture that values…

Health
5
Washington Prayer Coalition

to spread the gospel to the world by planting and serving churches, training local Christian leaders and to transform the world through prayer,

Religion
6
L I F E Ministries Inc Community Pregnancy Center

Our mission is to affirm life through evangelism, education, counseling and practical assistance.

Health
7
Options Pregnancy Resource Centers Inc

Empowering life-affirming decisions

Health
8
Empowering Lives International

Empowering Lives International (ELI) ignites world changers. We equip families and orphans to crush poverty, embrace Christ, and share their transformation with others through their God-honoring income, their deepening relationship with…

Religion
9
Shepherd Care Ministries Inc

Provides adoption services to meet the needs of both birth parents and adoptive families placement of domestic and international children with families.

—
10
Education for Life Inc

The Womens Pregnancy Center is a Christ-centered ministry designed to engage and inform women in unplanned pregnancies, empowering them to make life-affirming decisions.

Health
11
Sozo International Inc

Sozo International partners with at-risk families to create a sustainable future and transformed lives through education, health, and economic initiatives.

—
12
Global Impact Ministries Inc Dba Love Life

Love Life is uniting and mobilizing the church to create a culture of love and life that will bring an end to abortion and the orphan crisis.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Life; the most unlike its peers is WATER4 Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YOUNG LIFE - NORMAN: $59,000 · OtherYOUNG LIFE - NORMANOPEN DOOR MINISTRIES: $38,000 · OtherOPEN DOOR MINISTRIESSEARCH MINISTRIES INC: $37,000 · OtherSEARCH MINISTRIES INCCAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST INC: $31,000 · OtherCAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST INCYOUNG LIFE - OK 21: $30,000 · OtherYOUNG LIFE - OK 21Food & Shelter for Friends: $26,000 · OtherFood & Shelter for FriendsFOOD & SHELTER FOR FRIEND: $25,000 · OtherFOOD & SHELTER FOR FRIEND+7 more: $33,000 · Other+7 more111Project Inc: $54,500 · Human Services111Project IncSunhive collective Inc: $9,000 · Human ServicesSunhive collecti…WILLOW SPRINGS BOYS RANCH INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesWILLOW SPRINGS B…WATER4 INC: $4,500 · Human ServicesWATER4 INCYOUNG LIFE: $59,500 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIFESHILOH SUMMER CAMP INC: $4,000 · Youth DevelopmentSHILOH SUMMER …Alternatives Pregnancy Center Inc: $42,500 · HealthAlternatives …THE EDEN CLINIC INC: $16,000 · HealthTHE EDEN CLIN…International Christian Concern Inc: $5,500 · ReligionOUR NEIGHBORHOOD EMPOWERED INC FORMERLY COLE COMMUNITY IMPACT ORG: $5,000 · ReligionElam Ministries: $2,500 · ReligionTHE SPERO PROJECT INC: $8,000 · EmploymentGlobal Sports Partners Inc: $2,500 · Recreation & Sports
Other$279,000Human Services$74,000Youth Development$63,500Health$58,500Religion$13,000Employment$8,000Recreation & Sports$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYOUNG LIFE: $59,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budget111Project Inc: $54,500 over 8y, 3.2% of budgetAlternatives Pregnancy Center Inc: $42,500 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetTHE EDEN CLINIC INC: $16,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetSunhive collective Inc: $9,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetTHE SPERO PROJECT INC: $8,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWILLOW SPRINGS BOYS RANCH INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetInternational Christian Concern Inc: $5,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetOUR NEIGHBORHOOD EMPOWERED INC FORMERLY COLE COMMUNITY IMPACT ORG: $5,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetWATER4 INC: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetElam Ministries: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGlobal Sports Partners Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds 111Project Inc ↗
  • Who funds Alternatives Pregnancy Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE EDEN CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds Sunhive collective Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE SPERO PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds WILLOW SPRINGS BOYS RANCH INC ↗
  • Who funds International Christian Concern Inc ↗
  • Who funds OUR NEIGHBORHOOD EMPOWERED INC FORMERLY COLE COMMUNITY IMPACT ORG ↗
  • Who funds WATER4 INC ↗
  • Who funds SHILOH SUMMER CAMP INC ↗
  • Who funds Elam Ministries ↗
  • Who funds Global Sports Partners Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Servant FoundationKS21.3× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · The Signatry Charitable Trust · Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fortress Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fortress Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 78%
  • Global Sports Partners Inc: 78% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Fortress Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Fortress Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Fortress’ filings →

More from the funding graph