Skip to content

· Private foundation

Forrest E Mars Jr Sheridan Charitable

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$246k
Granted FY2022
26
Grants FY2022
2
States reached
$40k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Forrest E Mars Jr Sheridan Charitable’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Wyoming Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2022, the last year Forrest E Mars Jr Sheridan Charitable named its own grantees at scale: 15 organizations, $246k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

16
’20
15
’22
0
’23
0
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Philanthropy$5.9MArts & Culture$134kEducation$85kHuman Services$45kFood & Nutrition$35kHealth$32kEnvironment$30kCrime & Legal$30kOther$0
02FY2022 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k12 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $200k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE NEW MUSEUM AT THE BRADFORD BRINTON$40,000
BIG HORN EDUCATION FUND$30,000
UPRISING$15,000
VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA$12,500
LUNCH TOGETHER SOUP KITCHEN$12,500
DOG AND CAT SHELTER$10,000
SHERIDAN COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL$10,000
ADVOCACY AND RESOURCE CENTER$10,000
SHERIDAN COUNTY MUSEUM$10,000
NATURE CONSERVANCY IN WYOMING$10,000
WYO THEATER$10,000
ST VINCENT FOUNDATION$10,000
SHERIDAN COUNTY FULMER PUBLIC LIBRARY$10,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF THE EASTERN$10,000
GREEN HOUSE LIVING FOR SHERIDAN$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–22, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CLIMB WYOMING: $3k → 10%CLIMB WYOMING: $3k → 10%ADVOCACY AND RESOURCE CENTER: $10k → 10%ADVOCACY AND RESOURCE CENTER: $10k → 10%THE HUB ON SMITH: $5k → 10%THE HUB ON SMITH: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$377k · 24 repeat orgs$101k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +52% since the first grant, against +40% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 24 still active in FY2022, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call). Read against FY2022, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
4

Total granted

$377k
$61k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
+40%

Still filing today

54%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’22
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureCivil RightsAnimalsFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BH
    BIG HORN EDUCATION FUND INC
    2× · 2020–2022 · $55k · revenue +52% · 45% of their budget
  • VO
    VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA NORTHERN ROCKIES
    2× · 2020–2022 · $25k · revenue +194%
  • AR
    ADVOCACY & RESOURCE CENTER
    2× · 2020–2022 · $20k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • TN
    THE NEW MUSEUM AT THE BRADFORD BRINTON RANCHgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $39k · revenue +40%
  • SP
    ST PETER'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
  • JF
    JOEY FLYFISHING FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wyoming Outdoor Council

The wyoming outdoor council's mission is to protect wyoming's environment and quality of life now and for future generations.

Environment
2
Wyoming Wildlife Federation

Wyoming wildlife federation delivers leadership in conservation for the state's wildlife, hunters, anglers, and conservationists through policy, education, advocacy, and habitat.

Animals
3
The Wyldlife Fund

To unite people to advance wyoming wildlife habitat, research, and education.

Animals
4
Wyoming Assn of Non Profit Organizations dba Wyoming Nonprofit Network

The Wyoming Nonprofit Network represents the collective voice of the Wyoming charitable nonprofit sector and brings best practices, resources, and support to the nonprofit community.

Philanthropy
5
Wyoming Donor Alliance

The wyoming donor alliance supports a network of statewide organizations focused on increasing civic participation.

Public Benefit
6
Better Wyoming

Better wyoming works to educate, organize and mobilize wyoming residents on behalf of statewide change.

Public Benefit
7
Wyoming Historical Society Group Return

To insure that wyoming's past remains accessible to present and future generations and to educate, support and foster the study of wyoming history.

—
8
Wyoming Coalition Against Domestic Violence and Se

Through a collective voice, the Wyoming Coalition Against Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault is committed to provide leadership, education, and systems advocacy to advance social change and end violence.

—
9
Wyoming Wildlife Advocates

To promote science-based wildlife management that fosters ecosystem health and dynamic equilibrium between species throughout the state of wyoming.

Animals
10
Wyoming State Fair Foundation

To ensure that the Wyoming State Fair serves as a vibrant celebration of our states agriculture, youth, education, heritage, and industry, while evolving to meet the needs of future generations. WSFF is the fundraising arm of the WSF,…

Recreation & Sports
11
Wyoming Cares Inc

None

Human Services
12
Wyofile

Wyofile is an independent, nonprofit news service focused on the people, places and policy of wyoming. recognizing the rapid decline in resources among traditional news outlets, wyofile offers in-depth coverage of complicated subjects and…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wyoming Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Uprising. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
13/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WYOMING COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,835,168 · PhilanthropyWYOMING COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONTHE NEW MUSEUM AT THE BRADFORD BRINTON: $40,000 · OtherLUNCH TOGETHER SOUP KITCHEN: $25,000 · OtherVOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA NORTHERN ROCKIES: $25,000 · OtherSHERIDAN COUNTY MUSEUM: $20,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $20,000 · OtherSHERIDAN COUNTY FULMER PUBLIC LIBRARY: $20,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF THE EASTERN: $20,000 · OtherSHERIDAN COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $20,000 · OtherST VINCENT FOUNDATION: $20,000 · OtherST PETER'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $15,000 · OtherGREEN HOUSE LIVING FOR SHERIDAN: $10,000 · OtherCHILD ADVOCACY SERVICES: $10,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMY-LOCAL SHERIDAN: $10,000 · OtherBIG HORN CITY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $10,000 · OtherSHERIDAN HEALTH CENTER INC: $10,000 · Other+6 more: $24,000 · OtherBIG HORN EDUCATION FUND INC: $55,000 · EducationNorthern Wyoming Community College Foundation: $10,000 · EducationTHE NEW MUSEUM AT THE BRADFORD BRINTON RANCH: $39,032 · Arts & CultureWYO THEATRE INC: $20,000 · Arts & CultureADVOCACY & RESOURCE CENTER: $20,000 · Human ServicesSENIOR CITIZEN COUNCIL: $10,000 · Human ServicesCLIMB DBA CLIMB WYOMING: $5,000 · Human ServicesUPRISING: $20,000 · Civil RightsDOG & CAT SHELTER INC: $20,000 · Animals
Philanthropy$5,835,168Other$299,000Education$65,000Arts & Culture$59,032Human Services$35,000Civil Rights$20,000Animals$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWYOMING COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,835,168 over 2y, 25% of budgetBIG HORN EDUCATION FUND INC: $55,000 over 2y, 45% of budgetTHE NEW MUSEUM AT THE BRADFORD BRINTON RANCH: $39,032 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetVOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA NORTHERN ROCKIES: $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetADVOCACY & RESOURCE CENTER: $20,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetUPRISING: $20,000 over 2y, 7.8% of budgetDOG & CAT SHELTER INC: $20,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetWYO THEATRE INC: $20,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetSENIOR CITIZEN COUNCIL: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNorthern Wyoming Community College Foundation: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSHERIDAN HEALTH CENTER INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetWYOMING STOCK GROWERS LAND TRUST: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSpecial Olympics Wyoming Inc: $5,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCLIMB DBA CLIMB WYOMING: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDOWNTOWN SHERIDAN ASSOCIATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WYOMING COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BIG HORN EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NEW MUSEUM AT THE BRADFORD BRINTON RANCH ↗
  • Who funds VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA NORTHERN ROCKIES ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds ADVOCACY & RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds UPRISING ↗
  • Who funds DOG & CAT SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds WYO THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds SENIOR CITIZEN COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds Northern Wyoming Community College Foundation ↗
  • Who funds SHERIDAN HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds WYOMING STOCK GROWERS LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds Special Olympics Wyoming Inc ↗
  • Who funds CLIMB DBA CLIMB WYOMING ↗
  • Who funds DOWNTOWN SHERIDAN ASSOCIATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Wyoming Community FoundationWY32.2× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Wyoming Community Foundation · Homer A Scott & Mildred S Scott Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Joe and Arlene Watt Foundation Inc · Dan & Jeanne Scott Family Foundation · The Roberts Family Foundation · Anne & Scott Nickerson Family Foundation · Homer A Jr & Janet Scott Family Foundation · The Seidler Foundation · Bnsf Railway Foundation · John and Helen Ilsley Family Foundation · The Riggs Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Forrest E Mars Jr Sheridan Charitable funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Forrest E Mars Jr Sheridan Charitable. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Forrest E Mars Jr Sheridan Charitable?

    Find your warmest path to Forrest E Mars Jr Sheridan Charitable through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Forrest E Mars Jr Sheridan’s filings →

    More from the funding graph