Skip to content
Forever Young Family Foundation Ima at a glance

· Private foundation

Forever Young Family Foundation Ima

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$34kArts & Culture$13kHealth$8kPhilanthropy$1kHuman Services$1kHousing & Shelter$650Education$550International$500Other$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$250
Median grant
5
States reached
$23k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KING CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS$2,000
MELBOURNE CENTRAL CATHOLIC$500
SAMARITANS PURSE$500
LYMEDISEASEORG$250
URI FOUNDATION & ALUMNI ENGAGEMENT$100
BREVARD SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$100
SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $750) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $250 → 17%PREBORN: $500 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
NY
IN
OH
NJ
RI
CA
MD
KS
NC
AL
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$51k · 8 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +70% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
15

Total granted

$51k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+70%
+17%

Still filing today

50%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $850 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthArts & CultureHousing & ShelterEducationEnvironmentReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    MELBOURNE CENTRAL CATHOLIC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $34k
  • KC
    KING CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS
    5× · 2017–2024 · $11k
  • IL
    INTERNATIONAL LYME AND ASSOCIATED DISEASES EDUCATION FUND
    2× · 2017–2022 · $3k

Funded once

  • WC
    WOMEN'S CENTER GUILD
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • IL
    INTERNATIONAL LYRNE AND ASSOCIATED DISEASES EDUCATION FUND
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF RIDGEFIELD COMMUNITY
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lyme Disease Biobank Foundation

To advance knowledge and facilitate research of the pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of lyme disease and other tick-borne infections.

Health
2
Lovelace Biomedical & Environmental Research Institute Inc

Lberi's mission is to serve humanity through research on the prevention, treatment, and cure of respiratory disease and support the research and efforts of lbri.

—
3
International Biomedical Research Alliance

Our mission is to invest in and accelerate the development of the most promising future leaders in biomedical research with global impact.

Health
4
Polybio Research Foundation Inc

We are a 501(c)3 transforming how complex chronic conditions like longcovid, me/cfs & post treatment lyme disease are studied, diagnosed, and treated. polybio was founded by three scientists with complementary expertise (neuroscience,…

—
5
MRIGlobal

To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.

Science & Tech
6
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
7
Focus On Lyme Foundation

To improve diagnostics, treatment, prevention and advocacy for patients suffering from lyme and associated tick-borne diseases.

Arts & Culture
8
Biomedical Research Foundation of Northwest Louisiana

Our mission is to promote, encourage, carry on, and aid in the conduct and commercialization of scientific investigations and technology development; the development and implementation of novel business ideas and processes; education,…

Health
9
Lymphoma Research Foundation

To eradicate lymphoma and serve those touched by this disease.

Health
10
International Lyme and Associated Diseases Society Inc

An international medical society whose mission is to disseminate scientific knowledge and enhance clinical expertise relating to Lyme and Associated diseases. Supports a collaborative effort among scientists, researchers, healthcare…

Community Improvement
11
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
12
Lymphatic Education & Research Network Inc (Le&Rn)

The organization's mission is to fight lymphatic diseases and lymphedema through education, research and advocacy. the organization seeks to accelerate the prevention, treatment, and cure of lymphatic diseases while bringing patients and…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Brevard County Inc; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
7/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MELBOURNE CENTRAL CATHOLIC: $34,000 · OtherMELBOURNE CENTRAL CATHOLICKING CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $10,500 · OtherKING CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTSINTERNATIONAL LYME AND ASSOCIATED DISEASES EDUCATION FUND: $2,900 · Other+16 more: $9,135 · Other+16 moreBREVARD SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $1,050 · Arts & CultureInternational Rett Syndrome Foundation: $500 · HealthNurses Educational Funds Inc: $200 · HealthPROMISE INC: $650 · Housing & ShelterSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $500 · ReligionUNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND FOUNDATION & ALUMNI ENGAGEMENT: $300 · EducationMoms for Liberty Foundation Inc: $250 · Civil Rights
Other$56,535Arts & Culture$1,050Health$700Housing & Shelter$650Religion$500Education$300Civil Rights$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBREVARD SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $1,050 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLyme Disease Association Inc: $750 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPROMISE INC: $650 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rett Syndrome Foundation: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND FOUNDATION & ALUMNI ENGAGEMENT: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMoms for Liberty Foundation Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLYMEDISEASEORG: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE RESOURCES COUNCIL OF EAST FLORIDA INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBAY AREA LYME FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNurses Educational Funds Inc: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF BREVARD COUNTY INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Givin…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
American Online Giving Foundation IncDE7.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Forever Young Family Foundation Ima funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Forever Young Family Foundation Ima. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • United Way of Brevard County Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Promise Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Forever Young Family Foundation Ima’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home