Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Forever Home Inc

Forever Homes, Inc.

$270k
Granted FY2024still arriving
23
Grants FY2024still arriving
15
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2024.

Human Services$360kInternational$40kRecreation & Sports$35kHealth$11kEducation$8kOther$0
02FY2024 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$10,000
Median grant
15
States reached
$407k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LIFELINE CHILDRENS SERVICES$40,000
HAND IN HAND$20,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
ADOPTION PARTNERS OF MICHIGAN$10,000
LEGACY ADOPTION SERVICES$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
HEART OF HEART ADOPTIONS$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
ADOPTION SOLUTIONS OF ARIZONA$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
A NEW BEGINNING ADOPTION AGEN$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
FIRST BANK BLUE EARTH$10,000
A WORLD FOR CHILDREN$10,000
ALL ABOUT U ADOPTIONS$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $140k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 36% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BUILDING ARIZONA FAMILIES: $10k → 11%ADOPTION SOLUTIONS OF ARIZONA: $10k → 15%MADISON ADOPTION ASSOCIATES: $10k → 10%A NEW BEGINNING ADOPTION AGEN: $10k → 8%A WORLD FOR CHILDREN: $30k → 6%ADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN AND FA: $10k → 15%HEART OF HEART ADOPTIONS: $10k → 8%INTERNATIONAL ADOPTION NET: $10k → 8%ALL ABOUT U ADOPTIONS: $10k → 9%OPEN ARMS ADOPTION SERVICES: $10k → 22%A WORLD FOR CHILDREN: $10k → 6%HEART OF HEART ADOPTIONS: $10k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
ID
MN
WI
MI
MA
SD
CA
UT
CO
MO
DE
AZ
KS
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

27%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$130k · 4 repeat orgs$344k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +9% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
12

Total granted

$130k
$144k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
+7%

Still filing today

75%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 26% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $200k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
Human ServicesReligionHealthEducationInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LC
    LIFELINE CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $50k · revenue +9%
  • AW
    A WORLD FOR CHILDREN
    2× · 2023–2024 · $40k · revenue -19%
  • HT
    HEART TO HEART ADOPTION INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $20k · revenue +35%

Funded once

  • TF
    TENNIS FOR A BETTER LIFE INC
    one grant, 2022 · $35k
  • CC
    CHOICES CLINICS INC
    one grant, 2022 · $11k · revenue +21%
  • NH
    NEW HORIZONS ADOPTION AGENCY INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +7%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United in Love Adoptions
Human Services
2
Hand in Hand Christian Adoption Inc
—
3
Adoption Authority Inc

Providing compassion, respect, and loving care to each individual on their unique adoption journey. We commit to honoring and nurturing expectant mothers through pregnancy, birth, and life after placement.

—
4
Adoption Avenues

Adoption of children

—
5
Adoption Choices Inc

The Organization is a full-service adoption agency whose services include adoptive placements, counseling, consultation and adoptive home assessments.

Human Services
6
Choice Adoptions

Our mission is to support, educate, and advocate for all those involved in the adoption process while protecting vunerable children.

—
7
Carolina Adoption Services Inc

Carolina adoption services provides international and domestic adoption services, foster care, home studies, and post adoption support for children, youth and adoptive families.

Human Services
8
Adoption Is an Option
Youth Development
9
A Lifetime Adoption Foundation
Human Services
10
Adopt International

To assist people in adopting domestic and international children educate families about adoption and provide counseling to birth parents

Human Services
11
Adoption Advocates Inc

Adoption placements

Human Services
12
Adoption Advocates Inc

The mission of the organization is to facilitate the adoption process, provide counseling to birth parents and adoptive parents, and bring permanency into children's lives.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lifeline Children's Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Florida Southern College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
7/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TENNIS FOR A BETTER LIFE INC — $35,000 · OtherTENNIS FOR A BETTER LIFE INCIndividual grant recipient — $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientA GUARDIAN ANGEL ADOPTIONS — $10,000 · OtherNEW HORIZONS ADOPTION AGENCY INC — $10,000 · OtherABIDING LOVE ADOPTION AGENCY — $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $10,000 · OtherOpen Door Adoption Agency Inc — $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $10,000 · OtherROBERT F KENNEDY COMM ALLIANC — $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $10,000 · OtherOZARKS FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN — $10,000 · OtherADOPTION PARTNERS OF MICHIGAN — $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $10,000 · OtherDOVER MILLER KARRAS LANGDALE — $10,000 · OtherFIRST BANK BLUE EARTH — $10,000 · OtherNIGHTLIGHT CHRISTIAN ADOPTIONS — $10,000 · OtherLEGACY ADOPTION SERVICES — $10,000 · OtherCHILDREN OF ALL NATIONS — $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $10,000 · OtherBEACON HOUSE ADOPTION SERVICE — $10,000 · OtherA WORLD FOR CHILDREN — $40,000 · Human ServicesA WORLD FOR CHILDRENHEART TO HEART ADOPTION INC — $20,000 · Human ServicesHEART TO HEART ADOPTION INCINTERNATIONAL ADOPTION NET — $10,000 · Human ServicesINTERNATIONAL ADOPTION NETADOPTION SOLUTIONS OF ARIZONA — $10,000 · Human ServicesADOPTION SOLUTIONS OF ARIZONAALL ABOUT U ADOPTIONS INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesALL ABOUT U ADOPTIONS INCOPEN ARMS ADOPTION SERVICES INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesOPEN ARMS ADOPTION SERVICES INCA NEW BEGINNING ADOPTION AGENCY INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesA NEW BEGINNING ADOPTION AGENCY I…MADISON ADOPTION ASSOCIATES LTD — $10,000 · Human ServicesMADISON ADOPTION ASSOCIATES LTDADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES — $10,000 · Human ServicesADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILI…BUILDING ARIZONA FAMILIES — $10,000 · Human ServicesBUILDING ARIZONA FAMILIESLIFELINE CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC — $50,000 · ReligionLIFELINE CH…HAND IN HAND — $20,000 · InternationalCHOICES CLINICS INC — $11,000 · HealthFLORIDA SOUTHERN COLLEGE — $8,000 · Education
Other$245,000Human Services$140,000Religion$50,000International$20,000Health$11,000Education$8,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLIFELINE CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC — $50,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetA WORLD FOR CHILDREN — $40,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHEART TO HEART ADOPTION INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetHAND IN HAND — $20,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetCHOICES CLINICS INC — $11,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetNEW HORIZONS ADOPTION AGENCY INC — $10,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL ADOPTION NET — $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetOpen Door Adoption Agency Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetADOPTION SOLUTIONS OF ARIZONA — $10,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetALL ABOUT U ADOPTIONS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetOPEN ARMS ADOPTION SERVICES INC — $10,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetA NEW BEGINNING ADOPTION AGENCY INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetMADISON ADOPTION ASSOCIATES LTD — $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBUILDING ARIZONA FAMILIES — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNIGHTLIGHT CHRISTIAN ADOPTIONS — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFLORIDA SOUTHERN COLLEGE — $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Our RescueGrafted Families IncPure IncNatl Christian Charit…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Our RescueUT17.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Our Rescue · Grafted Families Inc · Pure Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Forever Home Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Florida Southern College — 0% of income from government
  • Choices Clinics Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home