Skip to content

· Private foundation

Fordan Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$12k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$38kPhilanthropy$6kInternational$5kHealth$4kEducation$4kHuman Services$688Arts & Culture$400Civil Rights$150Other$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$72
Median grant
3
States reached
$6k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF DALLAS$5,599
HOLY SPIRIT CATHOLIC CHURCH$4,364
COMPASSION INTERNATIONAL$666
COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS - NORTH TEXAS GIVING DAY$590
UNIVERSITY OF DALLAS$137
BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE$125
Individual grant recipient$100
ST CECELIA CHURCH$72
Individual grant recipient$70
BRIDGE HOMELESS RECOVERY CENTER$65
THE CATHOLIC PRO-LIFE COMMUNITY (CPLC)$50
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$50
Individual grant recipient$43
Individual grant recipient$25
SALVATION ARMY$20
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHICANOS POR LA CAUSA: $100 → 11%AMERICAN WHEELCHAIR MISSION: $500 → 13%HIKE FOR LIFE: $250 → 14%HIKE FOR LIFE: $150 → 14%HIKE FOR LIFE: $100 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
NV
CT
CA
UT
CO
NE
KY
AZ
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$51k · 18 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against +27% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
24

Total granted

$51k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+27%

Still filing today

39%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $433 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationInternationalReligionEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Compassion International Incorporated
    9× · 2017–2025 · $5k · revenue +16%
  • BC
    Baylor College of Medicine
    5× · 2017–2025 · $1k · revenue +67%
  • NY
    NEW YORK MEDICAL COLLEGE
    6× · 2018–2024 · $850 · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $500
  • AW
    AMERICAN WHEELCHAIR FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $500 · revenue +54%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $352
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Baylor University Medical Center

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
2
Cook Children's Medical Center

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.

Health
3
Cook Children's Medical Center - Prosper

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.

Health
4
Good Samaritan Hospital Foundation

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

—
5
Holy Cross Hospital Inc

We, holy cross hospital and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. holy cross hospital is a member of trinity health.

Health
6
Christus Health Foundation of Southeast Texas

Christus health foundation of southeast texas serves the philanthropic needs of christus health southeast texas by soliciting and distributing contributions in support of christus health southeast texas.

—
7
Cook Children's Physician Network

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease, and injury.

Health
8
Cook Children's Health Plan

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease, and injury.

Health
9
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
10
St Luke's Foundation

As an affiliate of commonspirit health, we make the healing presence of god known in our world by improving the health of the people we serve, especially those who are vulnerable, while we advance social justice for all.

Health
11
Children's Health System of Texas

With more than 1 million patient visits each year, Children's Health is North Texas' leading pediatric health system and among the largest in the nation. For more than a century, our mission has been clear: make life better for children.…

Health
12
Christus St Michael Foundation

The corporation is organized and shall be operated exclusively for the charitable, scientific, and educational purposes of advancing, promoting, and supporting the health care ministries of those religious congregations (the "sponsoring…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Charities of Dallas Inc; the most unlike its peers is Hike for Life Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
12/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF DALLAS: $20,771 · OtherCATHOLIC DIOCESE OF DALLASHOLY SPIRIT CATHOLIC CHURCH: $16,530 · OtherHOLY SPIRIT CATHOLIC CHURCH+38 more: $8,277 · Other+38 moreCompassion International Incorporated: $5,276 · InternationalCompassion…COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC: $4,510 · Philanthropy+1 more: $50 · PhilanthropyBaylor College of Medicine: $1,025 · EducationUniversity of Dallas: $437 · EducationAMERICAN WHEELCHAIR FOUNDATION: $500 · Human ServicesHIKE FOR LIFE INC: $500 · Human ServicesCHICANOS POR LA CAUSA INC CPLC: $100 · Human ServicesMethodist Hospitals of Dallas Guild: $600 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $440 · HealthTHE BOGGY CREEK GANG INC: $50 · HealthLA PROMESA FOUNDATION: $200 · Religion
Other$45,578International$5,276Philanthropy$4,560Education$1,462Human Services$1,100Health$1,090Religion$200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCompassion International Incorporated: $5,276 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC: $4,510 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBaylor College of Medicine: $1,025 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK MEDICAL COLLEGE: $850 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMethodist Hospitals of Dallas Guild: $600 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN WHEELCHAIR FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHIKE FOR LIFE INC: $500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $440 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Dallas: $437 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLA PROMESA FOUNDATION: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHICANOS POR LA CAUSA INC CPLC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF DALLAS INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION: $70 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBRIDGE STEPS: $65 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHEAST TEXAS: $58 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOGGY CREEK GANG INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Compassion International Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds Baylor College of Medicine ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK MEDICAL COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Methodist Hospitals of Dallas Guild ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN WHEELCHAIR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HIKE FOR LIFE INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds University of Dallas ↗
  • Who funds LA PROMESA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHICANOS POR LA CAUSA INC CPLC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF DALLAS INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGE STEPS ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHEAST TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds THE BOGGY CREEK GANG INC ↗
  • Who funds STAND UP TO CANCER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Texas Instruments FoundationTX16.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Texas Instruments Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fordan Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fordan Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Fordan Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph