Skip to content

· Private foundation

For the Future Foundation

The specific purpose of this Organization is to identify, fund and improve nonprofit entities registered under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code which are located in and around the underserved rural county of La Plata, Colorado and the United States Territory of Puerto Rico.

$270k
Granted FY2024still arriving
23
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$48k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Youth Development$232kReligion$206kCommunity Improvement$190kPublic Benefit$69kInternational$62kRecreation & Sports$51kPhilanthropy$33kCivil Rights$26kOther$0
02FY2024 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $253k
$10,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$128k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Summit Church PR$48,000
Young Life$40,910
Cross Bar X Youth$33,000
Fellowship of Christian Athletes$30,000
Turning Point$24,000
Men of Nehemiah$12,000
Heritage Foundation$12,000
Hillsdale College Funding$11,100
Operation Bless$11,000
Love The Nations$10,500
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Palmas Academy$10,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Oneness Needs Everyone$2,400
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 79% of grant dollars ($736k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 21% that went abroad ($194k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Oneness Needs Everyone: $2k → 12%Riverhouse Children Center: $400 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
WY
CT
CA
CO
VA
AZ
AR
NC
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL

Beyond the US: 21% of all-years giving ($194k)

3 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Puerto Rico$130k · 8 grants
Afghanistan$62k · 7 grants
Argentina$1k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 5% of For the Future Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

For the Future Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 24% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$652k · 23 repeat orgs$268k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +28% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
31

Total granted

$652k
$202k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+16%

Still filing today

35%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $66k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsPublic BenefitHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YL
    YOUNG LIFE
    3× · 2020–2022 · $80k · revenue +62%
  • THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION
    4× · 2021–2024 · $69k · revenue +32%
  • FO
    FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES
    2× · 2023–2024 · $40k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • 2A
    2022 ACT FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $70k · revenue +39%
  • UW
    UT Wealth Management Center
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • SC
    Summit Church
    one grant, 2022 · $24k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
2
Intentional Life Media

Dedicated to igniting personal transformation by affirming faith, inspiring hope, and equipping individuals, to live an intentional life in christ.

Religion
3
International Leadership Institute

The international leadership institute (ili) changes history by accelerating the spread of the gospel through training and mobilizing leaders of leaders to reach their nations. ili accomplishes this purpose through cutting edge leadership…

Religion
4
Lutheran Association of Missionaries and Pilots Us

Lutheran indian ministries shares the gospel of jesus christ with native american people, encouraging them to proclaim christ's kingdom to their own and to others.

—
5
The Montana Land Reliance

The mission of the montana land reliance (mlr) is to partner with landowners to provide permanent protection for private lands that are significant for agricultural production, fish and wildlife habitat, and open space.

Environment
6
Christians for Biblical Equality

See schedule o.christians for biblical equality (cbe), www.cbeinternational.org, is a 501c3 nonprofit organization comprised of individuals, churches, colleges, seminaries, and organizations, representing more than 100 different…

—
7
Colorado Christian Academy

Colorado christian academy provides an innovative christ-centered education that prioritizes academic achievements and individual development of the whole child. in relationship with parents, we will build healthy foundations that result…

Education
8
Arizona Christian University

Arizona christian university provides a biblically-integrated, liberal arts education equipping graduates to serve the lord jesus christ in all aspects of life, as leaders of influence and excellence.

Education
9
Lausanne Committee for World Evangelization

The lausanne movement exists to activate the body of christ to accelerate global mission together through convening global influencers, creating biblically grounded missional content, fostering catalytic collaboration, and equipping…

Religion
10
Inter-America Mission
—
11
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

—
12
Mount Zion Literature Ministry

The mission of mzl is to promote the publication, distribution, and sale of christian literature in spanish and english speaking countries in latin america, africa, and other areas.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Life; the most unlike its peers is Clc Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
15/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Cross Bar X Youth: $103,650 · OtherCross Bar X YouthTurning Point: $52,000 · OtherTurning PointYoung Life: $50,510 · OtherYoung LifeIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHillsdale College Funding: $49,040 · OtherHillsdale College FundingSummit Church PR: $48,000 · OtherSummit Church PRLove The Nations: $30,500 · OtherUT Wealth Management Center: $25,000 · OtherPalmas Academy: $24,000 · OtherSummit Church: $24,000 · OtherOperation Bless: $23,000 · Other+40 more: $115,264 · Other+40 moreYOUNG LIFE: $80,137 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIFEFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $40,000 · Youth DevelopmentFELLOWSHIP OF …2022 ACT FOUNDATION INC: $70,000 · Philanthropy2022 ACT FOU…CLC FOUNDATION: $33,000 · PhilanthropyCLC FOUNDATI…THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $69,011 · Public BenefitMEXICO MEDICAL MISSIONS: $19,000 · HealthLove the Nations Inc: $10,000 · Human ServicesONENESS NEEDS EVERYONE: $2,400 · Human Services+1 more: $400 · Human ServicesCROSS BAR X YOUTH RANCH INC: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsTRAILS 2000 INC: $612 · Recreation & Sports
Other$594,964Youth Development$120,137Philanthropy$103,000Public Benefit$69,011Health$19,000Human Services$12,800Recreation & Sports$10,612

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYOUNG LIFE: $80,137 over 3y, 0.0% of budget2022 ACT FOUNDATION INC: $70,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $69,011 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCLC FOUNDATION: $33,000 over 3y, 8.9% of budgetMEXICO MEDICAL MISSIONS: $19,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetCROSS BAR X YOUTH RANCH INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetLove the Nations Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $9,480 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JOHN LUTHERAN CHURCH OF BELLVILLE TX TRUST FUND: $5,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetONENESS NEEDS EVERYONE: $2,400 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetINTERNATIONAL MYELOMA FOUNDATION: $1,620 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFamily Legacy Missions International: $1,344 over 2y, 0.0% of budgeti AM Music Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMANNA - THE DURANGO SOUP KITCHEN: $724 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTRAILS 2000 INC: $612 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRIVERHOUSE CHILDREN'S CENTER INC: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNTAIN MIDDLE SCHOOL: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLA PLATA COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $204 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds 2022 ACT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds CLC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MEXICO MEDICAL MISSIONS ↗
  • Who funds CROSS BAR X YOUTH RANCH INC ↗
  • Who funds Love the Nations Inc ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds ST JOHN LUTHERAN CHURCH OF BELLVILLE TX TRUST FUND ↗
  • Who funds ONENESS NEEDS EVERYONE ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL MYELOMA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Family Legacy Missions International ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation Serving Southwest ColoradoCO17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation Serving Southwest Colorado · Thoren Family Charitable Trust · Ballantine Family Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization For the Future Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from For the Future Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to For the Future Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to For the Future Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 62 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on For the Future’s filings →

    More from the funding graph