Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

For Others Collective Inc

For others raises awareness and empowers best-in-class organizations to end the child welfare crisis in america.

$6.9M
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
13
States reached
$1.2M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.

Human Services$7.1MPhilanthropy$5.4MInternational$2.2MReligion$1.4MHealth$1.3MCommunity Improvement$1.1MHousing & Shelter$150kFood & Nutrition$100k
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $73k
  • $50k–250k11 grants · $984k
  • $250k+8 grants · $5.9M
$150,000
Median grant
13
States reached
$18M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DISCOVERY LAND COMPANY FOUNDATION$1,207,864
THE CONTINGENT$998,295
THE GLOBAL ORPHAN PROJECT$956,181
CONNECTIONS HOME$697,100
GOVERNOR'S FAITH-BASED AND COMMUNITY INITIATIVE$662,557
RESTORE HOPE INC$520,500
BIRDS FOR SOFIA INC$500,000
CHOSEN CARE$311,181
TIMOTHY HILL RANCH$200,000
LIFELINE CHILDREN'S SERVICES$150,000
PROMISE686 INC$150,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE$100,000
DIFFERENT DAY FOUNDATION$75,000
FREEDOM CHURCH$59,000
COYOTE HILL CHRISTIAN CHILDREN'S HOME$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $4.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 39% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CITY WITHOUT ORPHANS: $10k → 19%TIMOTHY HILL RANCH: $200k → 7%FOSTERING HOPE AUSTIN: $24k → 6%CHOSEN CARE: $311k → 10%DIFFERENT DAY FOUNDATION: $75k → 22%RESTORE HOPE INC: $521k → 17%FLORIDA COALITION FOR CHILDREN: $25k → 19%REACHING HIGHER: $25k → 5%HOUSE OF PROVIDENCE: $50k → 8%KIDS TO LOVE FOUNDATION: $50k → 11%BIG OAK RANCH: $75k → 13%COYOTE HILL CHRISTIAN CHILDREN'S HOME: $50k → 17%AMERICA'S KIDS BELONG: $21k → 9%AMERICA'S KIDS BELONG: $150k → 11%TIMOTHY HILL CHILDREN'S RANCH INC: $200k → 7%CHOSEN CARE: $250k → 10%RESTORE HOPE INC: $378k → 17%HOUSE OF PROVIDENCE: $50k → 8%BIG OAK RANCH: $50k → 13%COYOTE HILL CHRISTIAN CHILDREN'S HOME: $50k → 17%TENNESSEE KIDS BELONG: $50k → 4%CREWE ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION: $100k → 8%AMERICA'S KIDS BELONG: $116k → 11%TIMOTHY HILL CHILDREN'S RANCH INC: $200k → 7%CHOSEN CARE: $225k → 10%COYOTE HILL CHRISTIAN CHILDREN'S HOME: $25k → 17%CHOSEN CARE: $111k → 10%PROMISE686 INC: $150k → 9%CHOSEN CARE: $60k → 10%PROMISE686 INC: $150k → 9%PROMISE 686 INC: $126k → 9%PROMISE686 INC: $175k → 9%PROMISE686 INC: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MI
NY
OR
CA
UT
CO
MO
KS
AR
TN
OK
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$15M · 16 repeat orgs$2.3M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +76% since the first grant, against +31% for the ones you funded once.

16 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
18

Total granted

$15M
$519k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+76%
+31%

Still filing today

100%
61%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.8M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesReligionPhilanthropyHealthHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    CONNECTIONS HOMES INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $2.2M · revenue +32% · 51% of their budget
  • TG
    THE GLOBAL ORPHAN PROJECT INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $2.2M · revenue +132%
  • BF
    Birds for Sofia Inc
    3× · 2022–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +0% · 52% of their budget

Funded once

  • TN
    THINK NATIVE LLC
    one grant, 2022 · $98k
  • FC
    FREEDOM CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
  • TK
    TENNESSEE KIDS BELONG INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +40%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Child Hope International

We minister to orphans and widows in their distress by transitioning children from orphanages into loving families. We do this through Christ- centered care, training and social work.

Arts & Culture
2
Childrens House International

Children's house international provides ethical adoption services, child focused recruitment, and family support. we support disadvantaged children with humanitarian aid in countries worldwide.

—
3
Covenant Care Services Inc

Covenant Care Services, Inc. is a non-profit faith-based adoption agency serving birthmothers and adoptive families in the state of Georgia. The Organization counsels women experiencing unplanned pregancy and educates them about the option…

Human Services
4
Christian Works for Children Inc

Adoption, maternity & parenting services, family & individual counseling, children's support groups

Human Services
5
Nightlight Christian Adoptions

Adoption & humanitarian services.

—
6
Fostering Family

Fostering family dba the riverside project is a 501(c)(3) public charity that on behalf of houston's children and their families, brings together organizations and passionate people working as one to help families heal and children thrive.

Community Improvement
7
Fostering Hope New England Inc

We empower churches and individuals to care for children and families impacted by foster care. we partner with churches to help them establish sustainable cultures of serice to the foster care community, with particular focus on raising

Human Services
8
Methodist Children's Home

Methodist children's home equips children, youth, and families to flourish by offering hope through christian-centered relationships, services, and support.

Human Services
9
Foundation for the Homeless Inc

Empowering families and individuals experiencing homelessness to build a future filled with dignity, opportunity, and lasting solutions.

—
10
Agape Adoption Agency of Arizona Inc

Agape Adoption Agency of Arizona, Inc is a Christian adoption and family service agency with services and programs which promote life, love, and healing.

Human Services
11
American Adoptions of California Dba Family Connection Christian Adoption

Family connections christian adoptions exists to assist the waiting children of the world into permanent, loving families. it is our belief that god's love is best expressed in the family. the work of fcca is a living expression of our…

Unclassified
12
Children's Choice Inc

Children's choice is a christian social service agency, which provides specialized community-based services. children's choice serves as a bridge for individuals who are in need of the re-integrative process of family living. intensive,…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Convoy of Hope and the most unlike its peers is Different Day Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPolicy Research and AdvocacyCommunity FoundationsFaith-Based Social ServicesYouth Sports ProgramsYouth Development ServicesCommunity FoundationsChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Christian Missionary Organi…Christian Youth Camps
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 12 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%7%<5yr14%17%5–10yr19%46%10–20yr16%17%20–35yr13%10%35–55yr16%2%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%17%5–10yr19%58%10–20yr16%15%20–35yr13%9%35–55yr16%0%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/43
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,522

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
38/39
Grantees still filing
29/39
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE DISCOVERY LAND COMPANY FOUNDATION — $3,285,525 · PhilanthropyTHE DISCOVERY LAND COMPANY FOUNDATIONTHE GLOBAL ORPHAN PROJECT INC — $2,196,148 · PhilanthropyTHE GLOBAL ORPHAN PROJECT INCIMPACT INVESTING CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC — $1,000,000 · PhilanthropyIMPACT INVESTING CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INCFAITH BASED AND COMMUNITY INITIATIVE FOUNDATION — $662,557 · PhilanthropyFAITH BASED AND COMMUNITY INITIATIVE FOUNDATI…+4 more — $389,186 · PhilanthropyCHOSEN CARE INC — $957,381 · Human ServicesCHOSEN CARE INCRESTORE HOPE INC — $898,727 · Human ServicesRESTORE HOPE INCPromise686 Inc — $606,289 · Human ServicesPromise686 IncTIMOTHY HILL CHILDREN'S RANCH INC — $600,000 · Human ServicesTIMOTHY HILL CHILDREN'S …Americas Kids Belong — $287,200 · Human ServicesAmericas Kids Belong+12 more — $721,000 · Human Services+12 moreCONNECTIONS HOMES INC — $2,199,267 · OtherCONNECTIONS HO…THINK NATIVE LLC — $97,600 · Other+6 more — $170,000 · Other+6 moreCAMP ANDERSON MINISTRIES INC — $1,050,000 · ReligionCAMP ANDERSO…LIFELINE CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC — $838,700 · ReligionLIFELINE CHI…FREEDOM CHURCH — $109,000 · Religion+3 more — $47,500 · ReligionBirds for Sofia Inc — $1,275,000 · Health+2 more — $25,000 · HealthTHE CONTINGENT — $998,295 · Community ImprovementNehemiah Project La Inc — $150,000 · Housing & ShelterONE CHURCH ONE CHILD INC — $20,000 · Housing & ShelterCONVOY OF HOPE — $100,000 · International
Philanthropy$7,533,416Human Services$4,070,597Other$2,466,867Religion$2,045,200Health$1,300,000Community Improvement$998,295Housing & Shelter$170,000International$100,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE DISCOVERY LAND COMPANY FOUNDATION — $3,285,525 over 3y, 44% of budgetCONNECTIONS HOMES INC — $2,199,267 over 3y, 51% of budgetTHE GLOBAL ORPHAN PROJECT INC — $2,196,148 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetBirds for Sofia Inc — $1,275,000 over 3y, 52% of budgetCAMP ANDERSON MINISTRIES INC — $1,050,000 over 3y, 28% of budgetIMPACT INVESTING CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC — $1,000,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE CONTINGENT — $998,295 over 1y, 9.8% of budgetCHOSEN CARE INC — $957,381 over 5y, 11% of budgetRESTORE HOPE INC — $898,727 over 2y, 7.2% of budgetLIFELINE CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC — $838,700 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetFAITH BASED AND COMMUNITY INITIATIVE FOUNDATION — $662,557 over 1y, 39% of budgetPromise686 Inc — $606,289 over 5y, 7.5% of budgetTIMOTHY HILL CHILDREN'S RANCH INC — $600,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetAmericas Kids Belong — $287,200 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetNATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC — $169,186 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNehemiah Project La Inc — $150,000 over 3y, 35% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE INC — $140,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBIG OAK RANCH INC — $125,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCoyote Hill Foster Care Ministries — $125,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetFREEDOM CHURCH — $109,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetCREWE ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetHOUSE OF PROVIDENCE — $100,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetDIFFERENT DAY FOUNDATION — $75,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetTENNESSEE KIDS BELONG INC — $50,000 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetKIDS TO LOVE FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetPLAYERS PHILANTHROPY FUND INC — $45,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCREWE FOUNDATION — $35,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetFLORIDA COALITION FOR CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetREACHING HIGHER INC — $25,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetFOSTERING HOPE AUSTIN — $24,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetONE CHURCH ONE CHILD INC — $20,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetWorldwide Foundation — $18,750 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetChristian Youth Camps Inc — $18,750 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetELI'S HOUSE — $13,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetASHES TO GLORY FOUNDATION — $12,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetADOPTION-SHARE INC — $12,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCITY WITHOUT ORPHANS — $10,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetUnite Greater Dallas — $10,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Servant FoundationChattanooga Christian…Natl Christian Charit…The Signatry Charitab…The US Charitable Gif…American Endowment Fo…Raymond James Charita…Gs Donor Advised Phil…Morgan Stanley Global…The Blackbaud Giving …Charities Aid Foundat…Network for Good
Servant FoundationKS19.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · Chattanooga Christian Community Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Signatry Charitable Trust · The US Charitable Gift Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Network for Good

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization For Others Collective Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • The Contingent — 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to For Others Collective Inc?

Find your warmest path to For Others Collective Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home