How much did FOR OTHERS COLLECTIVE INC grant in FY2024?

FOR OTHERS COLLECTIVE INC reported 22 grants totaling $6,933,677 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is FOR OTHERS COLLECTIVE INC based?

FOR OTHERS COLLECTIVE INC is based in TN.

FOR OTHERS COLLECTIVE INC

Foundation Dossiers Mostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

· Public charity

FOR OTHERS COLLECTIVE INC

To raise awareness and empower organizations to end the child welfare crisis in america

$6.9M

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$1.2M

Largest

01What you fund

0187% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2020–2024.

Philanthropy$7.5MHuman Services$4.0MReligion$2.0MHealth$1.3MCommunity Improvement$998kHousing & Shelter$170kInternational$100kOther$2.5M

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2020

higherrhikidsbelongchurches

2021

fellowshipimpactsystemformer fosterfoster youth

2022

foster adoptivecommitteddramaticallythrivekids belongexperiences outcomesrare

2023

child'spovertyhopecommittedsystemformer fosterfoster youth

2024

financiallyjesus christsolutionssystemformer fosterfoster youthrare

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

$10k–50k3 grants · $73k
$50k–250k11 grants · $984k
$250k+8 grants · $5.9M

$150,000

Median grant

States reached

$18M

Total assets

Largest grants

DISCOVERY LAND COMPANY FOUNDATION$1,207,864
THE CONTINGENT$998,295
THE GLOBAL ORPHAN PROJECT$956,181
CONNECTIONS HOME$697,100
GOVERNOR'S FAITH-BASED AND COMMUNITY INITIATIVE$662,557
RESTORE HOPE INC$520,500
BIRDS FOR SOFIA INC$500,000
CHOSEN CARE$311,181
TIMOTHY HILL RANCH$200,000
LIFELINE CHILDREN'S SERVICES$150,000
PROMISE686 INC$150,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE$100,000
DIFFERENT DAY FOUNDATION$75,000
FREEDOM CHURCH$59,000
BIG OAK RANCH$50,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $4.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 10%. 39% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$16M · 19 repeat orgs$2.6M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +214% since the first grant, against +90% for the ones you funded once.

19 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$16M

$714k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+214%

+90%

Still filing today

95%

67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.9M went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesPhilanthropyReligionHealthHousing & ShelterInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

DL
DISCOVERY LAND COMPANY FOUNDATION
3× · 2022–2024 · $3.3M · revenue +168% · 44% of their budget
CH
CONNECTIONS HOME
3× · 2022–2024 · $2.2M · revenue +859% · 51% of their budget
TG
THE GLOBAL ORPHAN PROJECT
5× · 2020–2024 · $2.2M · revenue +315%

Funded once

CE
CREWE ENDOWMENT FOUNDATIONgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +2091%
TN
THINK NATIVE LLC
one grant, 2022 · $98k
HO
HOUSE OF PROVIDENCEgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +63%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Child Hope International

We minister to orphans and widows in their distress by transitioning children from orphanages into loving families. We do this through Christ-centered care, training and social work.

Arts & Culture

Christs Hope U S a Inc

Empowering orphaned and vulnerable children to break the cycles of extreme poverty, AIDS, and spiritual brokenness through family-based care and discipleship in Jesus Christ.

Human Services

Covenant Care Services Inc

Covenant Care Services, Inc. is a non-profit faith-based adoption agency serving birthmothers and adoptive families in the state of Georgia.

Human Services

Foster Love Ministries

Placement of foster children into local foster homes and provision of support services to children and families both inside and outside of the foster care network.

Human Services

Childrens House International

Children's house international provides ethical adoption services, child focused recruitment, and family support. we support disadvantaged children with humanitarian aid in countries worldwide.

—

Family Promise - Salt Lake

We help families experiencing homelessness find lasting independence and security.

Housing & Shelter

Christian Homes of Abilene Inc

To change lives and build Christian families through maternity, foster, and adoption services.

Human Services

Freedom House Ministries

House of Hope Kansas City is a Christian-based nonprofit organization that exists to rescue the next generation from hurt and trauma. We fulfill this mission by providing a 1) comprehensive , long-term residential therapeutic program for…

Education

The Christian Home for Children Inc

Christian Home for Children, also known as Family Life Services, facilitates life transformation for single moms and their children through faith-based community. This is accomplished through a resident program and a community outreach…

—

Christian Works for Children Inc

Adoption maternity parenting services family individual counseling childrens support groups

Human Services

New Day for Children

Seeking to recover children caught in child sex trafficking and restore their stolen childhoods.

Health

Child Evangelism Fellowship of Kentucky Inc

Ministry to children

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lifeline Children's Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Convoy of Hope. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 12 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/44

the rest of the field

11%

206,164/1,819,521

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

39 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

38/39

Grantees still filing

37/39

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Philanthropy$7,533,416Human Services$4,020,597Other$2,516,867Religion$2,045,200Health$1,300,000Community Improvement$998,295Housing & Shelter$170,000International$100,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Servant FoundationKS20.5× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · Chattanooga Christian Community · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The US Charitable Gift Trust · Thrivent Charitable Impact & Investing · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation FOR OTHERS COLLECTIVE INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

3get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: BIRDS FOR SOPHIA INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~14 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 2 filed years.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

2 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +71% since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 872182454 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on BIRDS FOR SOPHIA INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 14 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 52% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to For Others Collective Inc?

Find your warmest path to For Others Collective Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

FOR OTHERS COLLECTIVE INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

39 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to For Others Collective Inc?

More from the funding graph

FOR OTHERS COLLECTIVE INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

39 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to For Others Collective Inc?

More from the funding graph