Skip to content

· Private foundation

Flying Diamond Ranch Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$31k
Granted FY2024still arriving
49
Grants FY2024still arriving
11
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Recreation & Sports$17kHuman Services$17kFood & Nutrition$15kEducation$15kAnimals$13kPublic Safety & Disaster$12kCommunity Improvement$12kPhilanthropy$8kOther$0
02FY2024 · 49 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$200
Median grant
11
States reached
$680k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KIT CARSON RURAL DEVELOPMENT$5,000
PIKES PEAK OR BUST RODEO$4,385
MARK HOGAN EMERGENCY FAMILY FUND$3,000
CO FFA FOUNDATION$2,000
NWSS-CATCH A CALF SPONSORSHIP$1,400
IDALIA SCHOOL$1,000
GOLDEN VIEW CLASSICAL ACADEMY FUNDR$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
ROGERS JOHNSON MEMORIAL FUND$1,000
CHEYENNE MOUNTAIN ZOO$1,000
WET MT VALLEY COMMUNITY FUND$1,000
KIT CARSON HIGH SCHOOL FFA$800
Individual grant recipient$667
COLORADO SPRINGS YOUTH SOCCER$500
Individual grant recipient$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 66% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH: $200 → 20%SPRINGS RESCUE MISSION: $3k → 9%CAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH: $200 → 20%CAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH: $200 → 20%SPRINGS RESCUE MISSION: $3k → 9%CAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH: $100 → 20%SPRINGS RESCUE MISSION: $500 → 9%KIT CARSON RURAL DEVELOPMENT: $5k → 14%KIT CARSON RURAL DEVELOPMENT: $3k → 14%KIT CARSON RURAL DEVELOPMENT: $3k → 14%KIT CARSON RURAL DEVELOPMENT: $500 → 14%KIT CARSON RURAL DEVELOPMENT: $500 → 14%KIT CARSON RURAL DEVELOPMENT: $500 → 14%HILLTOP RANCH: $500 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
WY
IA
PA
NJ
CA
CO
NE
MO
VA
NM
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$96k · 37 repeat orgs$39k to everyone else

37 repeat relationships: 27 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

37
77

Total granted

$96k
$32k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+60%

Still filing today

27%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesPhilanthropyPublic BenefitEducationRecreation & SportsHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KC
    KIT CARSON RURAL DEVELOPMENT
    5× · 2019–2024 · $12k · revenue +319%
  • The Trustees of Princeton University
    5× · 2019–2024 · $2k · revenue +5%
  • WL
    WESTERN LANDOWNERS ALLIANCE
    6× · 2019–2024 · $1k · revenue +347%

Funded once

  • WC
    WEST CHEYENNE COUNTY FIRE PROTECTIO
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • MH
    MARIAN HOUSE CATHOLIC CHARITIES
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
  • MH
    MARION HOUSE CATHOLIC CHARITIES
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Colorado Parks Foundation Inc
Recreation & Sports
2
Valkyrie Ranch Inc

Our mission at valkyrie ranch is to support special operations veterans and their families with healing, connection, and lifelong care while also giving back to the ranching community around us. through outdoor retreats, recovery programs,…

Human Services
3
Property and Environment Research Center

Perc is dedicated to advancing conservation through markets, incentives, property rights, and partnerships.

Public Benefit
4
Colorado Springs Rodeo Association

Protect and maintain the heritage and tradition of rodeo and western way of life.

—
5
Pikes Peak Athletic Foundation
Recreation & Sports
6
Colorado Open Lands

Colorado open lands' mission is to preserve the significant open lands and natural heritage of colorado through private and public partnerships, innovative land conservation, and strategic leadership.

Environment
7
Poudre Wilderness Volunteers

Poudre Wilderness Volunteers (PWV) is a Larimer County, Colorado, nonprofit 501(c)(3) organization founded in 1996. The mission of PWV is to assist the Canyon Lakes Ranger District of the United States Forest Service in managing and…

Environment
8
The Foundation At Shield Ranch
Youth Development
9
Roundup Riders of the Rockies Heritage and Trails Foundation

Preservation and maintenance of trails and related educational activities

—
10
Rocky Mountain Wild

Rocky mountain wild works to protect, connect, and restore wildlife and wild lands in the southern rocky mountain region. we work to secure the biodiversity of the mountains, plains, and desert ecosystems of colorado, wyoming, utah, and…

Environment
11
Rocky Mountain Youth Corps

Rocky mountain youth corps engages young people in the outdoors, inspiring them to use their strengths and potential to lead healthy, productive lives. we teach responsibility for self, community, and environment through teamwork, service,…

Youth Development
12
The Montana Land Reliance

The mission of the montana land reliance (mlr) is to partner with landowners to provide permanent protection for private lands that are significant for agricultural production, fish and wildlife habitat, and open space.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Springs Rescue Mission; the most unlike its peers is Tragedy Assistance Program for Survivors Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 137 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/29
Grantees still filing
21/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CO FFA FOUNDATION: $12,300 · OtherCO FFA FOUNDATIONKIT CARSON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT: $6,130 · OtherKIT CARSON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPTIndividual grant recipient: $5,805 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHEYENNE MOUNTAIN ZOO: $5,500 · OtherCHEYENNE MOUNTAIN ZOOWEST CHEYENNE COUNTY FIRE PROTECTIO: $5,000 · OtherNWSS-CATCH A CALF SPONSORSHIP: $4,800 · OtherWET MT VALLEY COMMUNITY FUND: $3,500 · Other+110 more: $59,195 · Other+110 moreKIT CARSON RURAL DEVELOPMENT: $11,500 · Human ServicesKIT CARSON RUR…THE SPRINGS RESCUE MISSION: $5,700 · Human ServicesTHE SPRINGS RE…CAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH: $700 · Human Services+1 more: $500 · Human ServicesPIKES PEAK OR BUST RODEO FOUNDATION: $9,958 · PhilanthropyPIKES PEA…WET MTN VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,000 · PhilanthropyWET MTN V…Pikes Peak Range Riders Foundation: $770 · PhilanthropyPikes Pea…+2 more: $200 · PhilanthropyTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $1,500 · EducationThe Trustees of Princeton University: $1,500 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $650 · EducationColorado Agricultural Leadership Foundation Inc: $200 · EducationWESTERN LANDOWNERS ALLIANCE: $1,100 · EnvironmentTRAGEDY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR SURVIVORS INC: $512 · HealthMAYO CLINIC: $257 · HealthSERENITY RECOVERY CONNECTION: $200 · HealthLeadership Program of the Rockies: $500 · Public BenefitPAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS: $100 · Public BenefitHEROBOX INC: $50 · Public Benefit
Other$102,230Human Services$18,400Philanthropy$11,928Education$3,850Environment$1,100Health$969Public Benefit$650

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKIT CARSON RURAL DEVELOPMENT: $11,500 over 5y, 4.2% of budgetPIKES PEAK OR BUST RODEO FOUNDATION: $9,958 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTHE SPRINGS RESCUE MISSION: $5,700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $1,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe Trustees of Princeton University: $1,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWESTERN LANDOWNERS ALLIANCE: $1,100 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWET MTN VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE SAND COUNTY FOUNDATION INC: $950 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPikes Peak Range Riders Foundation: $770 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH: $700 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $650 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTRAGEDY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR SURVIVORS INC: $512 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHilltop Ranch: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLeadership Program of the Rockies: $500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetROUNDUP RIDERS OF THE ROCKIES INC: $375 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $257 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTEAM AFRICA RISING INC: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSERENITY RECOVERY CONNECTION: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIETY FOR RANGE MANAGEMENT: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetColorado Agricultural Leadership Foundation Inc: $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDISCOVERY EYE FOUNDATION: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRanching Heritage Association: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCounty Sheriffs of Colorado: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEL POMAR FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWILLIAM J PALMER PARKS FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLUE ANGELS FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEROBOX INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Christian Home For Children Inc: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KIT CARSON RURAL DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds PIKES PEAK OR BUST RODEO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE SPRINGS RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds The Trustees of Princeton University ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN LANDOWNERS ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds WET MTN VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE SAND COUNTY FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

El Pomar FoundationCO23× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: El Pomar Foundation · The Joseph Henry Edmondson Foundation · Pikes Peak Community Foundation · Gates Family Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Flying Diamond Ranch Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Flying Diamond Ranch Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • The Trustees of Princeton University: 11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 137 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Flying Diamond Ranch’s filings →

More from the funding graph