Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Fiszel Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Philanthropy$2.6MEducation$616kHealth$203kReligion$194kYouth Development$183kInternational$58kFood & Nutrition$38kHuman Services$34kOther$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$5,216
Median grant
1
States reached
$6.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE ROYAL DRAWING SCHOOL (CAFAMERICA)$5,216
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–22, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $10k → 20%BOULDER CREST RETREAT: $3k → 7%THE NEW YORK FOUNDLING: $4k → 17%BELEV ECHAD: $3k → 17%BELEV ECHAD: $3k → 17%BELEV ECHAD: $1k → 17%BELEV ECHAD: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
IL
NY
OR
IA
IN
PA
NJ
CT
VA
DC
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.3M · 29 repeat orgs$262k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.

29 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 28 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
33

Total granted

$1.3M
$262k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+4%

Still filing today

52%
61%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyArts & CultureReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TN
    THE NIGHTINGALE-BAMFORD SCHOOL
    3× · 2018–2022 · $75k · revenue +76%
  • GC
    GRACE CHURCH SCHOOL
    2× · 2021–2022 · $70k · revenue +20%
  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC
    4× · 2018–2021 · $65k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • CA
    CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA (CAFAMERICA)
    one grant, 2022 · $47k
  • THE WINDWARD SCHOOL
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +20%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
2
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
3
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
4
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

6
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
7
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
12
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Philanthropic Trust and the most unlike its peers is Amazin' Mets Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyProfessional Trade Associat…School Parent-Teacher Organ…Youth Soccer ProgramsChristian Missionary Organi…Performing Arts Venues & Pr…Collegiate Greek Organizati…Asian Cultural & Religious …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%6%<5yr14%6%5–10yr20%9%10–20yr19%43%20–35yr14%17%35–55yr14%20%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%2%<5yr14%0%5–10yr20%1%10–20yr19%80%20–35yr14%7%35–55yr14%10%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%1/39
the rest of the field
13%
9,322/70,001

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/37
Grantees still filing
25/37
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST — $2,540,000 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST+4 more — $100,504 · PhilanthropyNYU LANGONE — $250,180 · OtherNYU LANGONETHE ALLEN-STEVENSON SCHOOL — $180,000 · OtherTHE ALLEN-STEVENSON SCHOOLTEMPLE ISRAEL INC — $143,700 · OtherTEMPLE ISRAEL INCIndividual grant recipient — $87,757 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNYU LANGONE HEALTH — $60,000 · OtherNYU LANGONE HEALTHUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN — $50,000 · OtherNIGHTINGALE — $50,000 · OtherTHE ROYAL DRAWING SCHOOL (CAFAMERICA) — $46,862 · OtherCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA (CAFAMERICA) — $46,842 · Other+28 more — $185,363 · Other+28 moreTHE NIGHTINGALE-BAMFORD SCHOOL — $75,000 · EducationGRACE CHURCH SCHOOL — $70,000 · EducationKIPP NEW YORK INC — $52,500 · EducationTHE WINDWARD SCHOOL — $25,000 · Education+4 more — $9,287 · EducationTHE YOUNG MEN'S AND YOUNG WOMEN'S HEBREW ASSOCIATION — $50,000 · ReligionLUPUS RESEARCH ALLIANCE INC — $25,000 · HealthNEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC — $5,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S BRAIN TUMOR FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 · Health+3 more — $1,500 · HealthCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS — $32,500 · Food & NutritionSBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesBELEV ECHAD INC — $7,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC — $5,050 · Human ServicesNEW YORK FOUNDLING — $4,000 · Human ServicesBOULDER CREST FOUNDATION — $2,500 · Human Services
Philanthropy$2,640,504Other$1,100,704Education$231,787Religion$50,000Health$33,500Food & Nutrition$32,500Human Services$28,550

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST — $2,540,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ALLEN-STEVENSON SCHOOL — $180,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTHE NIGHTINGALE-BAMFORD SCHOOL — $75,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGRACE CHURCH SCHOOL — $70,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $65,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetKIPP NEW YORK INC — $52,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE YOUNG MEN'S AND YOUNG WOMEN'S HEBREW ASSOCIATION — $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS — $32,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDAVID LYNCH FOUNDATION FOR CONSCIOUSNESS -BASED EDUCATION AND WORLD PEACE — $25,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE WINDWARD SCHOOL — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLUPUS RESEARCH ALLIANCE INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJEREMIAH PROGRAM — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE HIGH LINE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC — $9,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION — $8,004 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEAST HAMPTON COMMUNITY ALLIANCE INC — $7,500 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetBELEV ECHAD INC — $7,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC — $5,050 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC — $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SIGMA ALPHA MU FOUNDATION — $4,037 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNEW YORK FOUNDLING — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMAZIN' METS FOUNDATION INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetChildren of Fallen Patriots Foundation — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIMENTOR INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEAST HAMPTON VILLAGE AMBULANCE INC ASSOCIATION — $2,500 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOULDER CREST FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S BRAIN TUMOR FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCornell University — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTeach for America Inc — $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PERLMAN MUSIC PROGRAM INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLUNGEVITY FOUNDATION INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetB CURED INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHINA SUMMIT FOUNDATION INC — $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST
  • Who funds THE ALLEN-STEVENSON SCHOOL
  • Who funds THE NIGHTINGALE-BAMFORD SCHOOL
  • Who funds GRACE CHURCH SCHOOL
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC
  • Who funds KIPP NEW YORK INC
  • Who funds THE YOUNG MEN'S AND YOUNG WOMEN'S HEBREW ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS
  • Who funds DAVID LYNCH FOUNDATION FOR CONSCIOUSNESS -BASED EDUCATION AND WORLD PEACE
  • Who funds THE WINDWARD SCHOOL
  • Who funds LUPUS RESEARCH ALLIANCE INC
  • Who funds JEREMIAH PROGRAM
  • Who funds SBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE HIGH LINE INC
  • Who funds CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC
  • Who funds ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION
  • Who funds EAST HAMPTON COMMUNITY ALLIANCE INC
  • Who funds BELEV ECHAD INC
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC
  • Who funds NEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY11.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Fiszel Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 63 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph