Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Fisher Koch Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$34M
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$24M
Largest
01What you fund
0191% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$31MPhilanthropy$24MEnvironment$11MEducation$2.7MCrime & Legal$610kInternational$450kRecreation & Sports$250kReligion$250kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
  • $250k+3 grants · $34M
$250,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$132k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SCHWAB DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE FUND$23,961,919
NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION$10,000,000
MYRIAD USA$250,000
THE SANDERS INSTITUTE$100,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 51% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%CHURCH OF THE PALMS: $250k → 11%AMERICAN FRIENDS FOR THE PRESERVATION CZ CULTURE: $100k → 7%FITMONEY INC: $1.3M → 8%BOYS GIRLSCLUB OF BROCTON: $5k → 8%NEWTON NORTH PTSO: $7k → 8%PUNCTUATE 4 PRODUCTIONS INC: $15k → 10%WOMENS FOUNDATION OF BOSTON: $25k → 16%Council for Economic Education: $1k → 17%CONVENTION OF STATES FOUNDATION: $50k → 16%NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $300k → 14%NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $10.0M → 11%WATER ORG: $150k → 15%SCHWAB DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE FUND: $24.0M → 14%VICTORY JUNCTION: $150k → 14%ACE SCHOLARSHIPS: $100k → 8%INDEPENDENT WOMENS FORUM: $75k → 16%The Dorothy Koch Family Foundation: $50k → 20%MEDICAL COLLEGE-VA FOUNDATION: $50k → 22%FOSTERS OUTRIDERS FND: $50k → 5%THE SANDERS INSTITUTE: $100k → 10%LOBKOWICZ COLLECTIONS: $15k → 7%FITMONEY INC: $500k → 8%CLAY SOPER MEMORIAL FUND: $30k → 8%NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $275k → 14%NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $350k → 11%THE MISSION POSSIBLE IMPACT FUND: $250k → 14%VICTORY JUNCTION: $100k → 14%FOSTERS OUTRIDERS FND: $50k → 5%GOSNOLD INC: $50k → 8%Newton Schools foundation: $2k → 8%NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $275k → 14%PATIENT RIGHTS ADVOCATE INC: $27.4M → 8%NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $50k → 14%PATIENT RIGHTS ADVOCATE INC: $2.3M → 8%PATIENT RIGHTS ADVOCATE INC: $1.4M → 8%FITMONEY INC: $279k → 8%FITMONEY INC: $255k → 8%PATIENT RIGHTS ADVOCATE INC: $207k → 8%Fitmoney Inc: $100k → 8%FITMONEY INC: $100k → 8%NEWTON SCHOOLS PTSO: $20k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
NY
MA
WY
CO
MO
VA
AZ
TN
NC
DC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$46M · 7 repeat orgs$25M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +288% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
19

Total granted

$46M
$1.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+288%
+3%

Still filing today

71%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 29% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Civil RightsPhilanthropyEducationYouth DevelopmentHealthCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PI
    PATIENTRIGHTSADVOCATEORG INC
    4× · 2018–2021 · $31M · revenue ×23 · 72% of their budget
  • FI
    FITMONEY INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $2.5M · revenue +814% · 59% of their budget
  • NP
    NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION
    4× · 2019–2022 · $900k · revenue +288%

Funded once

  • TM
    THE MISSION POSSIBLE IMPACT FUND
    one grant, 2023 · $250k
  • CO
    CHURCH OF THE PALMS
    one grant, 2022 · $250k
  • W
    WATERORG
    one grant, 2019 · $150k · revenue +22%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
2
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
3
New Schools Fund

To improve public education by identifying and supporting the most promising education ventures in the country, and creating a nationwide network of education entrepreneurs committed to closing the achievement gap.

Education
4
Mit Free Speech Alliance

To promote free expression, academic freedom, viewpoint diversity, and open scientific inquiry in the MIT community

Civil Rights
5
State Financial Officers Foundation Inc

To promote free market and free enterprise principles, educate both the public and state financial officers on the role of responsible financial management in a free market economy, and develop educational forums and communication plans…

Education
6
Internet Society Foundation

At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…

International
7
Common Future

Common future is a network of pioneering leaders across the u.s. and canada who work deeply within their communities to create alternative approaches to business, philanthropy, and investing. we envision an economy that has transitioned…

Community Improvement
8
Observer Research Foundation America

Organization mission the observer research foundation america orf america is an independent, non-partisan, and nonprofit organization in washington dc dedicated to addressing policy challenges facing the united states, india, and their…

International
9
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
10
Womens Funding Network

Our mission as a global alliance is to provide strategies, research, and resources that support the critical agency and influence of women's foundations and gender justice funders in the movement for equality, justice, and power for all.

Education
11
Public Knowledge

Public knowledge promotes freedom of expression, an open internet, and access to affordable communications tools and creative works. we work to shape policy on behalf of the public interest.

Public Benefit
12
International Women's Forum Inc

The mission of the international women's forum is to advance women's leadership worldwide. iwf takes direct action to achieve our mission in three important ways. connect: our convenings provide networking and cutting-edge content…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Council for Economic Education and the most unlike its peers is Dorothy Koch Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
12/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SCHWAB DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE FUND — $23,961,919 · OtherSCHWAB DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE FUNDNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION — $10,350,000 · OtherNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATIONFITMONEY INC — $2,485,642 · OtherFITMONEY INC+15 more — $1,837,545 · OtherPATIENTRIGHTSADVOCATEORG INC — $31,305,116 · HealthPATIENTRIGHTSADVOCATEORG INCCIA OFFICERS MEMORIAL FOUNDATION — $610,000 · Crime & LegalMYRIAD USA INC — $300,000 · InternationalWATERORG — $150,000 · InternationalVICTORY JUNCTION GANG CAMP INC — $250,000 · Youth DevelopmentCLAY SOPER MEMORIAL FUND INC — $30,000 · Youth DevelopmentThe Sanders Institute — $100,000 · Civil RightsIndependent Women's Forum — $75,000 · Civil RightsCITIZENS FOR SELF-GOVERNANCE — $50,000 · Civil RightsALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION — $100,000 · Education+1 more — $1,500 · Education
Other$38,635,106Health$31,305,116Crime & Legal$610,000International$450,000Youth Development$280,000Civil Rights$225,000Education$101,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPATIENTRIGHTSADVOCATEORG INC — $31,305,116 over 4y, 72% of budgetFITMONEY INC — $2,485,642 over 6y, 59% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION — $900,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCIA OFFICERS MEMORIAL FOUNDATION — $610,000 over 4y, 4.9% of budgetMYRIAD USA INC — $300,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetVICTORY JUNCTION GANG CAMP INC — $250,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetWATERORG — $150,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION — $100,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE LOBKOWICZ COLLECTIONS INC — $100,000 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetThe Sanders Institute — $100,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetIndependent Women's Forum — $75,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetGOSNOLD INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCITIZENS FOR SELF-GOVERNANCE — $50,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetDorothy Koch Family Foundation — $50,000 over 1y, 34% of budgetCLAY SOPER MEMORIAL FUND INC — $30,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetWOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF MASSACHUSETTS INC — $25,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetNEWTON SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCOUNCIL FOR ECONOMIC EDUCATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Eastern Bank FoundationMA14.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Eastern Bank Foundation · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Fisher Koch Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 70%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 5%
  • Gosnold Inc5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Fisher Koch Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Fisher Koch Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph