Skip to content

· Public charity

First Presbyterian Church of Dallas Foundation

The foundation's mission is to support the programs of first presbyterian church and other presbyterian ministries and causes.

$2.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$1.6M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$12MHousing & Shelter$2.5MEducation$265kPhilanthropy$204kHuman Services$162kHealth$48kInternational$8kRecreation & Sports$6k
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $1,692,382, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,978,155 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $285,773 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $84k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.6M
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$40M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
First Presbyterian Church of Dallas$1,592,088
First Presbyterian Church of Dallas Developmental Day School$25,294
Ukirk SMU$16,200
Presbyterian Camps at Gilmont Inc$12,300
Presbyterian Children's Homes and Services$10,000
Austin College$10,000
Forefront Living Foundation$10,000
Presbyterian Mo-Ranch Assembly$8,500
Schriener University$8,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%First Presbyterian Church of Dallas Developmental Day School: $25k → 11%Presbyterian Communities Services Foundation: $60k → 14%Presbyterian Communities Services Foundation: $50k → 14%Presbyterian Communities Services Foundation: $38k → 14%Forefront Living Foundation: $26k → 14%Presbyterian Communities and Services - Forefront Living Foundation: $25k → 14%Presbyterian Communities Services Foundation: $20k → 14%Presbyterian Children's Homes and Services PCHAS: $16k → 10%Forefront Living Foundation: $10k → 14%Presbyterian Children's Home and Services: $15k → 10%PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES AND SERVICES: $11k → 10%Presbyterian Children's Homes and Services: $10k → 10%Encore Park: $2.5M → 14%DALLAS FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH DEVELOPMENTAL DAY SCHOOL: $21k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$13M · 13 repeat orgs$2.5M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue -2% since the first grant, against -28% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
2

Total granted

$13M
$2.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-2%
-28%

Still filing today

69%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationReligionHealthCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SU
    Schreiner University
    7× · 2017–2024 · $91k · revenue +73%
  • PC
    PRESBYTERIAN CAMPS AT GILMONT INC
    6× · 2018–2024 · $76k · revenue +240%
  • PM
    PRESBYTERIAN MO-RANCH ASSEMBLY
    5× · 2017–2024 · $73k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • EP
    Encore Park Dallas
    one grant, 2021 · $2.5M · revenue -90% · 74% of their budget
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF FT LIBERTE
    one grant, 2018 · $8k · revenue -28%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Faith Presbyterian Providers Inc

To provide hospice and physician services to residents in the dallas metroplex and training to physicians and other care givers on providing these services. faith presbyterian providers is currently dormant.

—
2
Presbyterian School

Family, School, and Church united in the education and support of each child - this is the founding premise upon which Presbyterian School nurtures and challenges its students. The school provides an educational program of the highest…

Education
3
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
4
Criswell College

The mission of criswell college is to provide ministerial and professional higher education for men and women preparing to serve as christian leaders throughout society, while maintaining an institutional commitment to biblical inerrancy.

Education
5
University of the Ozarks

True to our christian heritage, we prepare students from diverse religious, cultural, educational and economic backgrounds to live life fully.

Education
6
Pacific School of Religion

Pacific school of religion prepares a diverse cadre of spiritually rooted leaders with the vision, resilience, and skill to create a world where all can thrive. grounded in the rigorous study and faithful practice of progressive christian…

Education
7
Forefront Living

To promote the missions of the fl family of organizations of making each moment matter for those it serves.

Religion
8
Presbyterian Reformed Ministries International

Exalting jesus christ igniting the church in the power of the holy spirit under the authority of the holy bible as the word of god through prayer, leadership development, growing the church, and mission outreach so that the church may be…

Religion
9
Erskine College and Theological Seminary

Erskine College exists to glorify God as a Christian academic community where students are equipped to flourish as whole persons for lives of service through the pursuit of undergraduate liberal arts and graduate theological education.

Education
10
First Presbyterian Church of Dallas Foundation

The foundation's mission is to support the programs of first presbyterian church and other presbyterian ministries and causes.

Religion
11
Point Loma Nazarene University

Point loma nazarene university exists to provide higher education in a vital christian community where minds are engaged and challenged, character is modeled and formed, and service becomes an expression of faith. we aspire to be a…

Education
12
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dallas First Presbyterian Church Developmental Day School; the most unlike its peers is Ukirk Smu. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
4/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $11,679,975 · OtherFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH+4 more: $241,335 · OtherEncore Park Dallas: $2,500,000 · Human ServicesEncore Park DallasFOREFRONT LIVING FOUNDATION: $229,200 · Human ServicesFOREFRONT LIVING FOUN…+2 more: $98,764 · Human ServicesPRESBYTERIAN CAMPS AT GILMONT INC: $76,300 · ReligionPRESBYTERIAN MO-RANCH ASSEMBLY: $72,500 · ReligionSchreiner University: $90,600 · EducationAUSTIN COLLEGE: $48,500 · EducationFOREFRONT LIVING HOSPICE: $47,695 · HealthFRIENDS OF FT LIBERTE: $8,000 · Community Improvement
Other$11,921,310Human Services$2,827,964Religion$148,800Education$139,100Health$47,695Community Improvement$8,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEncore Park Dallas: $2,500,000 over 1y, 74% of budgetFOREFRONT LIVING FOUNDATION: $229,200 over 7y, 2.9% of budgetSchreiner University: $90,600 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetPRESBYTERIAN CAMPS AT GILMONT INC: $76,300 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetPRESBYTERIAN MO-RANCH ASSEMBLY: $72,500 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetPRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES & SERVICES: $52,200 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAUSTIN COLLEGE: $48,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFOREFRONT LIVING HOSPICE: $47,695 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetDallas First Presbyterian Church Developmental Day School: $46,564 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetUKIRK SMU: $39,400 over 3y, 12% of budgetFRIENDS OF FT LIBERTE: $8,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Encore Park Dallas ↗
  • Who funds FOREFRONT LIVING FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Schreiner University ↗
  • Who funds PRESBYTERIAN CAMPS AT GILMONT INC ↗
  • Who funds PRESBYTERIAN MO-RANCH ASSEMBLY ↗
  • Who funds PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES & SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds FOREFRONT LIVING HOSPICE ↗
  • Who funds Dallas First Presbyterian Church Developmental Day School ↗
  • Who funds UKIRK SMU ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF FT LIBERTE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX18.1× affinity7 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Texas Instruments Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization First Presbyterian Church of Dallas Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from First Presbyterian Church of Dallas Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on First Presbyterian Church of Dallas’ filings →

    More from the funding graph