Skip to content

· Private foundation

Firebird Foundation for Anthropological Research

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
46
Grants FY2024still arriving
12
States reached
$333k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Philanthropy$17MEnvironment$3.7MArts & Culture$2.4MEducation$647kSocial Science$262kScience & Tech$79kHuman Services$50kInternational$10k
02FY2024 · 46 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k35 grants · $190k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $127k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $476k
  • $250k+1 grant · $333k
$8,948
Median grant
12
States reached
$51M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Rangeley Lakes Heritage Trust$333,333
Northeast Wilderness Trust$195,000
Maine Coast Heritage Trust$125,000
University of Sydney$105,644
Maine Media Workshops College$50,000
Individual grant recipient$35,892
Individual grant recipient$26,100
Fidelity Charitable$24,291
Oceanarium & Education Center$20,902
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Phillips Public Library$10,000
Individual grant recipient$9,000
Individual grant recipient$9,000
Individual grant recipient$9,000
Individual grant recipient$9,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 92% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Native Land Conservancy Inc: $5k → 8%Fidelity Charitable: $16.8M → 16%Blackfoot Challenge: $150k → 16%Earth Island Institute: $10k → 10%Kalahari Peoples Fund: $10k → 10%Keres Children's Learning Center: $50k → 10%Living Tongue Institute for Endangered Languages: $9k → 14%Cold Spring School Inc: $200k → 12%YADAV TANVI: $10k → 13%Treasure Caretaker Training: $200k → 12%Indiana University: $20k → 18%Global Education Benchmark Group: $10k → 17%Northeast Wilderness Trust: $250k → 9%Maine Mountain Collaborative: $75k → 7%Chewonki Foundation: $300k → 9%Maine Coast Heritage Trust: $250k → 9%Maine Media Workshops College: $50k → 11%Oceanarium & Education Center: $21k → 11%Rangeley Lakes Heritage Trust: $500k → 14%Forest Society of Maine: $40k → 15%Fidelity Charitable: $300k → 16%Neighborhood Music School: $567k → 12%Treasure Caretaker Training: $60k → 12%Northeast Wilderness Trust: $250k → 9%Maine Mountain Collaborative: $50k → 7%Maine Coast Heritage Trust: $150k → 9%Rangeley Lakes Heritage Trust: $333k → 14%Forest Society of Maine: $40k → 15%Fidelity Charitable: $24k → 16%Neighborhood Music School: $392k → 12%Northeast Wilderness Trust: $195k → 9%Maine Mountain Collaborative: $35k → 7%Maine Coast Heritage Trust: $125k → 9%Rangeley Lakes Heritage Trust: $275k → 14%Forest Society of Maine: $40k → 15%New Haven Urban Resources: $50k → 12%Northeast Wilderness Trust: $25k → 9%Maine Mountain Collaborative: $10k → 7%Rangeley Lakes Heritage Trust: $250k → 14%Forest Society of Maine: $40k → 15%Neighborhood Music School: $391k → 12%MAINE MOUNTAIN COLLABORATIVE: $151k → 14%FOREST SOCIETY OF MAINE: $30k → 15%Integrated Refugee & Immigrant Services: $50k → 12%Phillips Public Library: $10k → 14%Phillips Public Library: $10k → 14%Phillips Public Library: $10k → 14%Borneo Research Council: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
VT
WA
MT
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
IN
OH
PA
CT
CA
UT
CO
KY
MD
AZ
NM
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 75% of Firebird Foundation for Anthropological Research’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Firebird Foundation for Anthropological Researchlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 5.4% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.3M · 29 repeat orgs$1.8M to everyone else

29 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 26 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
86

Total granted

$5.3M
$1.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+100%

Still filing today

31%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $308k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentEducationArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RL
    RANGELEY LAKES HERITAGE TRUST INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +63%
  • NM
    NEIGHBORHOOD MUSIC SCHOOL INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $1.4M · revenue +38%
  • NORTHEAST WILDERNESS TRUST CORPORATION
    4× · 2021–2024 · $720k · revenue +136%

Funded once

  • CF
    Chewonki Foundation Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $300k · revenue -17%
  • CS
    COLD SPRING SCHOOL INC
    one grant, 2022 · $200k · revenue -3%
  • BC
    BLACKFOOT CHALLENGE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $150k · revenue +43%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Land Conservancy of Ridgefield Inc

The Land Conservancy of Ridgefield, Inc. ("the Land Conservancy"), founded in 1967, preserves and protects, for the general benefit of the public, Ridgefield, Connecticut's natural resources including land and water resources, the plant…

Environment
2
Coastal Mountains Land Trust

We conserve land permanently to benefit the natural and human communities of western the Penobscot Bay region.

Environment
3
Presumpscot Regional Land Trust

We engage with communities to conserve, steward, and provide access to local lands and clean water for current and future generations to enjoy.

—
4
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
5
Natural History Institute

Natural History Institute is organized to provide leadership and resources for a revitalized practice of natural history that integrates art, science, and humanities to promote the health and well-being of humans and the rest of the…

Arts & Culture
6
Islesboro Islands Trust

The mission of Islesboro Islands Trust is to enhance the quality of residents' lives through the preservation of open space, educate all residents as to the value of the island's natural ecosystems, and act as an environmental advocate on…

Philanthropy
7
Massachusetts Land Conservation Trust

Conservation and preservation of land.

Environment
8
Midcoast Conservancy

The mission of Midcoast Conservancy is to protect vital lands and waters on a scale that matters and to inspire wonder and action on behalf of all species and the Earth.

Environment
9
Chebeague & Cumberland Land Trust

Our mission is to permanently conserve and steward natural resources across our island and mainland communities for the benefit of current and future generations.

—
10
Royal River Conservation Trust

The royal river conservation trust (rrct) is a regional land trust working primarily in seven maine municipalities. the trust owns,cares for, and stewards land and conservation easements to protect land and water resources for the general…

Environment
11
Nature and Culture International

Nature and culture international conserves biologically diverse landscapes in latin america, in concert with local cultures, for the well-being of the planet.

Environment
12
Frenchman Bay Conservancy

Frenchman Bay Conservancy protects and cares for our local lands and waters for the benefit of communities and nature.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Native Conservancy; the most unlike its peers is Phillips Public Library. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 142 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/23
Grantees still filing
17/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $17,148,416 · Community ImprovementFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUNDRANGELEY LAKES HERITAGE TRUST INC: $1,358,333 · EnvironmentRANGELEY LAKES H…NORTHEAST WILDERNESS TRUST CORPORATION: $720,000 · EnvironmentNORTHEAST WILDER…Maine Coast Heritage Trust: $525,000 · EnvironmentMaine Coast Heri…Maine Mountain Collaborative: $321,435 · EnvironmentMaine Mountain C…Chewonki Foundation Inc: $300,000 · EnvironmentChewonki Foundat…Forest Society of Maine: $190,021 · EnvironmentBLACKFOOT CHALLENGE INC: $150,000 · Environment+4 more: $32,799 · EnvironmentNEIGHBORHOOD MUSIC SCHOOL INC: $1,350,000 · Arts & CultureTreasure Caretaker Training: $260,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $29,902 · Arts & CultureUniversity of Sydney: $337,086 · Other+120 more: $1,243,292 · OtherCOLD SPRING SCHOOL INC: $200,000 · EducationKERES CHILDREN'S LEARNING CENTER: $50,000 · EducationPHILLIPS PUBLIC LIBRARY: $30,000 · EducationGLOBAL EDUCATION BENCHMARK GROUP: $10,000 · Education+1 more: $250 · Education
Community Improvement$17,148,416Environment$3,597,588Arts & Culture$1,639,902Other$1,580,378Education$290,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $17,148,416 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetRANGELEY LAKES HERITAGE TRUST INC: $1,358,333 over 4y, 8.2% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD MUSIC SCHOOL INC: $1,350,000 over 3y, 10% of budgetNORTHEAST WILDERNESS TRUST CORPORATION: $720,000 over 4y, 3.0% of budgetMaine Coast Heritage Trust: $525,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetMaine Mountain Collaborative: $321,435 over 5y, 45% of budgetChewonki Foundation Inc: $300,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetTreasure Caretaker Training: $260,000 over 2y, 90% of budgetCOLD SPRING SCHOOL INC: $200,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetForest Society of Maine: $190,021 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetBLACKFOOT CHALLENGE INC: $150,000 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetKERES CHILDREN'S LEARNING CENTER: $50,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetINTEGRATED REFUGEE AND IMMIGRANT SERVICES: $50,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetPHILLIPS PUBLIC LIBRARY: $30,000 over 3y, 17% of budgetBorneo Research Council: $12,799 over 3y, 7.5% of budgetEarth Island Institute Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL EDUCATION BENCHMARK GROUP: $10,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetKALAHARI PEOPLES FUND INC: $9,918 over 1y, 25% of budgetLIVING TONGUES INSTITUTE FOR ENDANGERED LANGUAGES: $9,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetNATIVE LAND CONSERVANCY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNATIVE CONSERVANCY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican Friends of the Royal Anthropological Institute: $250 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ↗
  • Who funds RANGELEY LAKES HERITAGE TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD MUSIC SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHEAST WILDERNESS TRUST CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Maine Coast Heritage Trust ↗
  • Who funds Maine Mountain Collaborative ↗
  • Who funds Chewonki Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Treasure Caretaker Training ↗
  • Who funds COLD SPRING SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds Forest Society of Maine ↗
  • Who funds BLACKFOOT CHALLENGE INC ↗
  • Who funds KERES CHILDREN'S LEARNING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds INTEGRATED REFUGEE AND IMMIGRANT SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds PHILLIPS PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds OCEANARIUM AND EDUCATION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Borneo Research Council ↗
  • Who funds Earth Island Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL EDUCATION BENCHMARK GROUP ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Maine Community Foundation IncME14.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Maine Community Foundation Inc · Ibm International Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Firebird Foundation for Anthropological Research funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Firebird Foundation for Anthropological Research. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 37%
  • Living Tongues Institute for Endangered Languages: 43% of income from government
  • Integrated Refugee and Immigrant Services: 37% of income from government
  • Neighborhood Music School Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Northeast Wilderness Trust Corporation: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Firebird Foundation for Anthropological Research?

Find your warmest path to Firebird Foundation for Anthropological Research through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 142 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Firebird Foundation for Anthropological Research’s filings →

More from the funding graph