· Private foundation
Fire Streak Ministry
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k7 grants · $17k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $69k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THREESIXTEEN MINISTRY INC | $35,000 |
| CHRISTIAN CALL INC | $24,000 |
| GATEWAY CHURCH | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| LOCUST LANE RIDING CENTER INC | $5,000 |
| COME AND SEE FOUNDATION | $2,000 |
| STEADY HANDS MINISTRY | $1,500 |
| OUR RESCUE | $1,500 |
| HEART OF GOD MINISTRIES INC | $1,200 |
| MESSIANIC JEWISH ALLIANCE OF AMERIC | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 33% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
10 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TMTHREESIXTEEN MINISTRY INC8× · 2017–2024 · $278k · revenue +48% · 50% of their budget
- CCCOUNTY CORRECTIONS GOSPEL MISSION2× · 2017–2019 · $12k · revenue +1%
- SDSIGI & DAVID OBLANDER MINISTRIES INC2× · 2017–2018 · $2k · revenue +100%
Funded once
- AOASSEMBLIES OF CHRIST CHURCHone grant, 2017 · $5k
- YLYOUNG LIFEgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $4k · revenue +59%
- GSGRAND STRAND CHRISTIAN CHURCHone grant, 2018 · $2k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…
Christian evangelism and reconciliation
To reach out to the chinese worldwide in local evangelism and foreign missions. this purpose is facilitated through the use of missionaries, evangelism training and literature.
To further the name of christ in an international environment by holding church and evangelistic services including house of prayer and training center for equipping people in futhering christianity. the english language is also taught in…
Cedar lake ministries exist to provide a life changing environment for evangelism and spiritual growth.
Provide counseling through assessments and counseling sessions. provided training program to churches and individuals.increase outreach in the community through social media and the web.
To spread the good news of jesus christ to everyone who will hear. to provide ministry to the whole man, spirit, soul, & body. to encourage
To promote charismatic renewal of the christian church at large and to promote the religious education of its members and youth within a christian worldview.
To strengthen marriages and families, to encourage Christian fellowship as we evangelize the lost around us and minister to the needy with the resources God has blessed us.
To minister to the emotional, physical and spiritual needs of any and all individuals, for the furtherance christian religion through bible delivarance, by means of evangelism, revival and religious meetings, religious correspondence,…
We hold it to be the mission of the church to proclaim the gospel to all mankind, to exalt the worship of the one true god, and to labor for the progress of knowledge, the promotion of justice, the reign of peace, and the realization of…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Life and the most unlike its peers is Chester County Connect Care. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THREESIXTEEN MINISTRY INC ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN CALL INC ↗
- Who funds COUNTY CORRECTIONS GOSPEL MISSION ↗
- Who funds LOCUST LANE RIDING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
- Who funds SIGI & DAVID OBLANDER MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds OUR RESCUE ↗
- Who funds HEART OF GOD MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds CHESTER COUNTY CONNECT CARE ↗
- Who funds BRIDGE ACADEMY AND COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds Eastern Mennonite University ↗
- Who funds CITY RELIEF INC ↗
- Who funds ENGLISH LANGUAGE INSTITUTE IN CHINA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Fire Streak Ministry funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.