Skip to content

· Private foundation

Finley Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$225k
Granted FY2024still arriving
25
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$947kYouth Development$788kCommunity Improvement$13kReligion$5k
02FY2024 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k19 grants · $39k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $86k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$2,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$4.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
About Our Kids Inc$100,000
Pittsburg State University$21,500
Missouri State University$20,500
Missouri Southern State University$19,500
University of Missouri-Columbia$13,000
Ozark Technical Community College$11,000
Southwest Baptist University$6,000
Crowder College$5,000
Missouri University Science Technol$5,000
University of Arkansas$5,000
Ozark Christian College$2,000
Fort Scott Community College$2,000
Cottey College$2,000
Metropolitan State University of De$1,000
United States Military Academy$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $788k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%About Our Kids Inc: $100k → 15%About Our Kids Inc: $100k → 15%About Our Kids Inc: $100k → 15%About Our Kids Inc: $100k → 15%About Our Kids Inc: $100k → 15%About Our Kids Inc: $100k → 15%About Our Kids Inc: $100k → 15%About Our Kids Inc: $88k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
IL
NY
IA
NJ
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
KS
AR
TN
OK
AL
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 47 repeat orgs$24k to everyone else

47 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2024, 25 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

47
17

Total granted

$1.7M
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+55%

Still filing today

32%
24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AO
    ABOUT OUR KIDS INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $788k · revenue +143% · 27% of their budget
  • EU
    Evangel University
    8× · 2017–2024 · $14k · revenue +51%
  • SB
    SOUTHWEST BAPTIST UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2017–2024 · $13k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • LU
    LAMAR UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • NO
    Northeast Oklahoma A M College
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
  • CS
    Columbia Southern University
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
2
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
3
LaGrange College

Education - lagrange college challenges the minds and inspires the souls of its students. founded in 1831 and committed to its relationship with the united methodist church and its wesleyan and liberal arts traditions, the college supports…

Education
4
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
5
University of the South

The College of Arts and Sciences is committed to the development of the whole person through a liberal arts education of the highest quality. The School of Theology educates women and men to serve the broad whole of the Episcopal Church in…

Education
6
Xavier University

Xavier is a jesuit catholic university rooted in the liberal arts tradition. our mission is to educate each student intellectually, morally, and spiritually. we create learning opportunities through rigorous academic and professional…

Education
7
Simpson College

Through innovative learning opportunities, individual student attention, and an unwavering commitment to inclusive educational access, simpson college cultivates a diverse community of learners to lead lives of meaning and purpose.

Education
8
Loyola University

Loyola University New Orleans, a Jesuit and Catholic institution of higher education, welcomes students of diverse backgrounds and prepares them to lead meaningful lives with and for others; to pursue truth, wisdom, and virtue; and to work…

Education
9
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
10
Nebraska Wesleyan University

Nebraska wesleyan university is an academic community dedicated to intellectual and personal growth within the context of a liberal arts education and in an environment of christian concern.

Education
11
Regent University

Regent University serves as a center of Christian thought and action to provide excellent education through a Biblical perspective and global context equipping Christian leaders to change the world.

—
12
Dordt University

As an institution of higher education committed to the reformed christian perspective, dordt university equips students, alumni, and the broader community to work effectively toward christ-centered renewal in all aspects of contemporary…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is William Jewell College; the most unlike its peers is About Our Kids Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 68 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
16/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PITTSBURG STATE UNIVERSITY: $207,500 · OtherPITTSBURG STATE UNIVERSITYMissouri Southern State University: $143,500 · OtherMissouri Southern State UniversityMissouri State University: $135,000 · OtherMissouri State UniversityUniversity of Missouri-Columbia: $86,000 · OtherUniversity of Missouri-ColumbiaCrowder College: $72,000 · OtherCrowder CollegeOzark Technical Community College: $33,500 · Other+44 more: $211,000 · Other+44 moreABOUT OUR KIDS INC: $788,000 · Human ServicesABOUT OUR KIDS INCEvangel University: $14,000 · EducationSOUTHWEST BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $13,000 · EducationCOLLEGE OF THE OZARKS: $10,500 · EducationCOTTEY COLLEGE: $7,000 · EducationThe Trustees of Princeton University: $4,000 · EducationSouthern New Hampshire University: $4,000 · EducationORAL ROBERTS UNIVERSITY: $4,000 · EducationDrury University: $3,000 · EducationSTEPHENS COLLEGE: $3,000 · EducationSOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $3,000 · Education+7 more: $10,500 · Education
Other$888,500Human Services$788,000Education$76,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetABOUT OUR KIDS INC: $788,000 over 8y, 27% of budgetEvangel University: $14,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHWEST BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $13,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLEGE OF THE OZARKS: $10,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCOTTEY COLLEGE: $7,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Trustees of Princeton University: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSouthern New Hampshire University: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetORAL ROBERTS UNIVERSITY: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDrury University: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHENS COLLEGE: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMIDWAY UNIVERSITY INC FKA MIDWAY COLLEGE: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWilliam Jewell College: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCreighton University: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJOHN BROWN UNIVERSITY: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetABILENE CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNSON & WALES UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNortheastern Oklahoma A&M College Development Foundation Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPOMONA COLLEGE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBelmont University: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ABOUT OUR KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds Evangel University ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWEST BAPTIST UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGE OF THE OZARKS ↗
  • Who funds COTTEY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds The Trustees of Princeton University ↗
  • Who funds Southern New Hampshire University ↗
  • Who funds ORAL ROBERTS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Drury University ↗
  • Who funds STEPHENS COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY ALUMNI ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds MIDWAY UNIVERSITY INC FKA MIDWAY COLLEGE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of the Ozarks IncMO15.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc · T Michal Flottman Scholarship Trust · Je and le Mabee Foundation Inc · Folds of Honor Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Finley Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Finley Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • The Trustees of Princeton University: 12% of income from government
  • Oral Roberts University: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 68 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Finley’s filings →

More from the funding graph