Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Finkel Family Foundation

Its FY2019 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$356k
Granted FY2019
23
Grants FY2019
6
States reached
$101k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172019.

Human Services$212kEducation$111kHousing & Shelter$25kReligion$6kPhilanthropy$6kEnvironment$6kHealth$5kEmployment$5kOther$0
02FY2019 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k18 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $307k
$1,300
Median grant
6
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TAMARACK CAMPS$101,000
HILLEL DAY SCHOOL$100,500
YAD EZRA ENDOWMENT FUND$55,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
KADIMA$25,000
SYRACUSE UNIV$5,000
JVS HUMAN SERVICES$4,096
TROUT UNLIMITED$3,000
HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL CENTER$2,500
HEBREW FREE LOAN$2,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT$1,500
BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL$1,300
MSU HILLEL FOUNDATION$1,200
MICHIGAN HUMANE SOCIETY$1,000
JARC$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–19, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JARC: $1k → 8%JARC: $1k → 8%JARC: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$347k · 15 repeat orgs$31k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against -66% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2019, 0 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
9

Total granted

$347k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
-66%

Still filing today

60%
11%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19
AnimalsEducationHealthHuman ServicesArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HD
    HILLEL DAY SCHOOL OF METRO DETROIT
    2× · 2018–2019 · $101k · revenue +39%
  • SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2018–2019 · $10k · revenue +40%
  • TU
    TROUT UNLIMITED INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $6k · revenue +133%

Funded once

  • M
    MITU
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
  • JH
    JEWISH HOSPICE CHAPLAINCY
    one grant, 2017 · $500
  • TJ
    THE JEWISH THEOLOGICAL SOCIETY
    one grant, 2017 · $500

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Greater Miami Hillel Foundation Inc

The mission of the organization is to enrich the lives of jewish undergraduate and graduate students so that they may enrich the jewish people and the world.

2
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
3
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

4
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
5
The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

Chartered by a unanimous act of congress, the museum is america's national institution for the documentation, study, interpretation, and education of holocaust history and serves as our country's memorial to the victims of the holocaust.…

Arts & Culture
6
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
7
Hebrew Academy of Cleveland

The mission of the hebrew academy is to imbue all students with a love of god, torah and eretz yisroel and to prepare them to achieve excellence in torah and general knowledge based on successful cooperation among family, judaic and…

8
The Jewish Fund

The jewish fund is organized and operates exclusively for charitable, educational, and religious purposes. the fund's primary activities are: supporting a jewish health care mission in the greater detroit area and michigan; promotion of…

Philanthropy
9
Hadassah the Women's Zionist Org of America Inc

Hadassah, the women's zionist organization of america, inc., a new york not-for-profit corporation ("hwzoa") enhances the health and lives of people in israel, the united states and worldwide through education, advocacy, women's…

Community Improvement
10
Jewish Historical Society of the Upper Midwest

The purpose of the society is to promote the vitality and continuity of jewish culture in the upper midwest through preservation, interpretation and education.

11
Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago

Federation amplifies our collective strength to make the world a better place for everyone. we assist people in need, impact chicagoans of all faiths; support israel and the jewish people worldwide; respond swiftly to crises; cultivate…

Philanthropy
12
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Detroit and the most unlike its peers is Dynami Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
15/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TAMARACK CAMPS — $103,233 · OtherTAMARACK CAMPSYAD EZRA ENDOWMENT FUND — $56,000 · OtherYAD EZRA ENDOWMENT FUNDIndividual grant recipient — $51,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientKADIMA — $25,000 · OtherKADIMA+17 more — $12,450 · OtherHILLEL DAY SCHOOL OF METRO DETROIT — $101,000 · EducationHILLEL DAY SCHOOL OF METRO DETRO…SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY — $10,000 · EducationSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY+1 more — $60 · EducationTROUT UNLIMITED INC — $5,500 · AnimalsMICHIGAN HUMANE SOCIETY — $1,000 · AnimalsDETROIT ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY — $500 · Animals+1 more — $35 · AnimalsJEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT — $3,680 · PhilanthropyHEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION — $2,500 · PhilanthropyGESHER HUMAN SERVICES — $4,596 · EmploymentJARC — $3,000 · Human ServicesHOLOCAUST MEMORIAL CENTER INC — $3,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$247,683Education$111,060Animals$7,035Philanthropy$6,180Employment$4,596Human Services$3,000Arts & Culture$3,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHILLEL DAY SCHOOL OF METRO DETROIT — $101,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTROUT UNLIMITED INC — $5,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGESHER HUMAN SERVICES — $4,596 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT — $3,680 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJARC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOLOCAUST MEMORIAL CENTER INC — $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION — $2,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMICHIGAN HUMANE SOCIETY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $785 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDYNAMI FOUNDATION — $750 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDETROIT ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BEAR-HUG FOUNDATION INC — $250 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHAPMAN UNIVERSITY — $60 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF HURON VALLEY — $35 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Robt & Gail Katz Family FoundationMI13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Robt & Gail Katz Family Foundation · Marvin and Betty Danto Family Foundation · David Kahan Family Foundation · The Andrea and Lawrence Wolfe Family Foundation · Harold and Penny B Blumenstein Foundation Corporation · The Ravitz Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Finkel Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph