· Public charity
Fight for Children Inc
Fight for children's mission is to help individuals, organizations, and communities in the metropolitan washington, dc area leverage the power of sports to improve the lives of underserved youth.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 15 grants below total $106,893 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $212,222 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $105,329 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k13 grants · $77k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CLOVERLEAF EQUINE CENTER | $20,000 |
| LEVELING THE PLAYING FIELD INC | $10,000 |
| SO KIDS SOAR | $6,750 |
| CITY KIDS DC | $6,625 |
| GIRLS ON THE RUN DC | $6,050 |
| STUDENT-ATHLETES ORGANIZED TO UNDERSTAND LEADERSHIP | $6,000 |
| JUNIOR TENNIS CHAMPIONS CENTER | $6,000 |
| WASHINGTON NATIONALS PHILANTHROPIES - YOUTH BASEBALL ACADEMY | $5,750 |
| ALEXANDRIA SOCCER ASSOCIATION | $5,750 |
| GRASSROOTS HEALTH | $5,750 |
| DC SCORES | $5,750 |
| DANCE INSTITUTE OF WASHINGTON | $5,750 |
| OPEN GOAL PROJECT | $5,750 |
| THE STAND FOUNDATION | $5,600 |
| WRESTLING TO BEAT THE STREETS DC | $5,368 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $540k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 8% of Fight for Children Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 78% of the giving stays in DC; read by stated purpose it is 86% — more of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
23 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CHCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION4× · 2019–2022 · $5.0M · revenue +72%
- CTCOLLEGE TRACK3× · 2019–2021 · $600k · revenue +105%
- ABAlexandria Boxing Club Inc7× · 2017–2023 · $449k · revenue +38% · 100% of their budget
Funded once
- AFATHLETES FOR HOPEgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $341k · revenue +105%
- LCLIVING CLASSROOMS FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $250k · revenue +58%
- NONEXT ONE UP FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $250k · revenue +302% · 46% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To empower and uplift the youth in under-resourced areas through comprehensive programming that takes a holistic approach for no cost or financial burden.
The Academy is a pre-kindergarten through grade eight independent school preparing girls and boys in the metropolitan Washington, DC area for competitive secondary schools. The Academy is a diverse independent day school committed to…
Global kids educates, inspires and mobilizes youth to become global citizens who are positively engaged in the world and are prepared for their future.
The primary mission of capital travel sports is to bring professional coaching to all committed players; to develop their technical capability, their understanding, their love of the game, and their sportsmanship. to utilize our…
The Club provides a comprehensive spectrum of services to inner-city youth in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area, with the objective of promoting moral, physical and emotional growth. The Club is committed to teaching children and…
Provide students with the academic foundation and ambition to earn a college degree.
Our mission is to dramatically improve the early career outcomes of dc youth and young adults of color by creating innovative programs and by mobilizing employers, educators, and city leaders to create a local, diverse talent pipeline. our…
Technology Playground is a nonprofit organization committed to empowering youth in Washington, DC, by equipping them with the tools, knowledge, and experiences necessary to break the cycle of poverty. The organization addresses economic…
Unity through excellence. dmv fc is a new youth soccer club in the greater reston-herndon, virginia area. we are a boutique club that caters to the elite athlete developing from the youngest stages. our partnership with the total futbol…
Stoddert Soccer League, Inc. d/b/a DC Soccer Club (DCSC) is a premier 501(c)(3) nonprofit dedicated to the youth of Washington, DC. DCSC provides a positive, fun, and developmentally focused soccer experience for approximately 7,500…
Dc prep's mission is to bridge the educational divide in washington, dc by increasing the number of students from underserved communities with the academic preparation and personal character to succeed in competitive high schools and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Next One Up Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Knock Out Abuse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 22 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COLLEGE TRACK ↗
- Who funds Alexandria Boxing Club Inc ↗
- Who funds ATHLETES FOR HOPE ↗
- Who funds LIVING CLASSROOMS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NEXT ONE UP FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds STEER FOR STUDENT ATHLETES INC ↗
- Who funds DC SCORES ↗
- Who funds THE WASHINGTON BALLET ↗
- Who funds So Kids SOAR ↗
- Who funds WRESTLING TO BEAT THE STREETS DC ↗
- Who funds Student-Athletes Organized to Under ↗
- Who funds BEACON HOUSE COMMUNITY MINISTRY INC ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON TENNIS & EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds OPEN GOAL PROJECT ↗
- Who funds ALEXANDRIA SOCCER ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds CITYDANCE ENSEMBLE INC ↗
- Who funds DC GRAYS BASEBALL INC ↗
- Who funds City Kids to Wilderness Project Inc ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON NATIONALS YOUTH BASEBALL ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds CLOVERLEAF EQUINE CENTER ↗
- Who funds GIRLS ON THE RUN - DC ↗
- Who funds GRASSROOTS HEALTH ↗
- Who funds DC BILINGUAL PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR TENNIS CHAMPIONS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ELSIE WHITLOW STOKES COMMUNITY FREEDOM PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds LEVELING THE PLAYING FIELD INC ↗
- Who funds CHESAPEAKE BAY OUTWARD BOUND SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON INNER CITY LACROSSE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PRINCE GEORGES TENNIS AND EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON NATIONALS PHILANTHROPIES ↗
- Who funds Capitol Post Inc ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON FITNESS SPORTS AND NUTRITION ↗
- Who funds KNOCK OUT ABUSE ↗
- Who funds WANDA DURRANT THE REAL MVP FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds DC PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL COOPERATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds TEENS RUN DC ↗
- Who funds CAPITAL ROWING CLUB INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Greater Washington Community Foundation · Good Sports Inc · The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · Clark Charitable Foundation Inc Dba a James & Alice B Clark Foundation · United Way of the National Capital Area · Clark-Winchcole Foundation · Hattie M Strong Foundation · Dimick Foundation John M Lynham Jr Trustee · Dick's Sporting Goods Foundation · Nora Roberts Foundation · Philip L Graham Fund co Graham Holdings Company · The Carl M Freeman Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Fight for Children Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Living Classrooms Foundation — 7% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.