Skip to content
Fhi Services at a glance

· Public charity

Fhi Services

Our mission is to restore, promote and maintain the health of the community.

$3.6M
Granted FY2018
44
Grants FY2018
1
States reached
$944k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2018.

Food & Nutrition$2.0MHealth$1.7MHousing & Shelter$605kPhilanthropy$585kHuman Services$421kEducation$417kCommunity Improvement$194kArts & Culture$131kOther$0
02FY2018 · 44 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under $10k6 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k21 grants · $472k
  • $50k–250k12 grants · $1.1M
  • $250k+5 grants · $2.0M
$30,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FAUQUIER COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS$944,301
FAUQUIER FREE CLINIC INC$306,000
RAPPAHANNOCK COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS$250,750
FAUQUIER HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$250,000
NORTHERN PIEDMONT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$250,000
CULPEPER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COPORATION$200,000
MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF FAUQUIER COUNTY$110,000
SPIRITWORKS FOUNDATION$100,000
FAUQUIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT$90,000
FAUQUIER FISH$88,650
FAUQUIER FREE CLINIC INC$81,000
FAUQUIER HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$75,572
FAUQUIER COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS$73,500
HERO'S BRIDGE$68,068
AFRO-AMERICAN HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION OF FAUQUIER COUNTY (AAHA)$65,765
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $353k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 5%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 5%HERO'S BRIDGE: $68k → 6%AGING TOGETHER: $62k → 8%AGING TOGETHER: $25k → 8%RAPP AT HOME: $40k → 10%FAUQUIER COMMUNITY CHILD CARE INC: $50k → 6%RAPPHOME: $35k → 10%FAUQUIER COMMUNITY CHILD CARE INC: $33k → 6%AGING TOGETHER: $5k → 8%VOLTRAN: $20k → 6%FAUQUIER COMMUNITY CHILD CARE INC: $15k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 9% of Fhi Services’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in VA; by stated purpose, 87%.

Fhi Serviceslessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 6.8% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.7M · 13 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
13

Total granted

$4.7M
$361k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+179%
+180%

Still filing today

69%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $744k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18
Human ServicesArts & CultureHealthPhilanthropyEducationFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FF
    FAUQUIER FREE CLINIC INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $689k · revenue +96% · 25% of their budget
  • FH
    FAUQUIER HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $388k · revenue +87% · 50% of their budget
  • MH
    MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF FAUQUIER COUNTY INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $199k · revenue +11% · 40% of their budget

Funded once

  • TC
    THE CHILD CARE AND LEARNING CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $85k · revenue +202%
  • FC
    FAUQUIER COMMUNITY FOOD BANK & THRIFT STOREgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $67k · revenue +54%
  • CC
    CULPEPER COUNTY
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fauquier Chamber of Commerce

We are focused on, and a resource for, the business, government and community interests of local businesses in and around fauquier county, virginia.

—
2
Fauquier Community Action Committee Inc

The organization seeks to reduce poverty, revitalize low income communities and empower low income individuals and families to become self-sufficient.

Human Services
3
Rappahannock Elder Housing Corporation

Rappahannock elder housing corporation owns and operates leaflin lane apartments. these subsidized one-bedroom units in culpeper, va are available for rent to persons age 62 and older who meet the low income criteria established by hud.

Housing & Shelter
4
Free Clinic of Franklin County Inc

The free clinic of franklin county, inc is founded on the belief that everyone should have access to quality, affordable, primary health care regardless of their socio-economic or insurance status.

—
5
Chesapeake Care Resources Inc

To provide quality services that enhance and improve life for individuals who have a developmental disability

Health
6
GoochlandCares

GoochlandCares (GC) provides basic human services for local individuals who need help with healthcare, housing, food, clothing, and domestic violence services, providing a safety net for 2,135 Goochland residents and their families in 2024.

Health
7
Free Clinic of the New River Valley Inc

The purpose of the Community Health Center of the New River Valley (CHCNRV) is to provide affordable and high quality medical, dental, behavioral, and preventive health care services to people of all ages and circumstances, regardless of…

—
8
Virginia Community Food Connections

Our mission is to ensure the availability, access, and affordability of locally produced food by connecting local farmers and all members of the community through programs, awareness, and advocacy.

Food & Nutrition
9
The Arc of Frederick County Inc

The arc of frederick county helps people with developmental disabilities live enviable lives, that is, lives filled with purpose and meaning, with friends and family. the arc provides services and advocacy.

—
10
Rappahannock Pantry Inc

The rappahanock pantry provides food to families in rappahannock county. we envision a community where everyone has access to healthful food.

Food & Nutrition
11
Culpeper Adult Day Care Center Inc

To own and operate an adult day care center to provide services related to daily living, care, nutritional, and social needs

Health
12
Hospice of Fulton County Inc

Care during final stage of life

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fauquier Community Child Care Inc; the most unlike its peers is Verdun Adventure Bound Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

10
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
24
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/34
Grantees still filing
28/34
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FAUQUIER COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $2,082,025 · OtherFAUQUIER COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLSFAUQUIER FREE CLINIC INC: $688,550 · OtherFAUQUIER FREE CLINIC INCRAPPAHANNOCK COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $584,750 · OtherRAPPAHANNOCK COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLSCULPEPER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP: $200,000 · OtherFAUQUIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT: $147,854 · Other+16 more: $538,140 · Other+16 moreNORTHERN PIEDMONT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $670,000 · PhilanthropyNORTHERN PIEDM…FAUQUIER FISH: $158,717 · PhilanthropyFAUQUIER FISH+1 more: $18,000 · PhilanthropyFAUQUIER HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $388,072 · Housing & ShelterFAUQUIER COMMUNITY CHILD CARE INC: $97,500 · Human ServicesAging Together Corporation: $92,000 · Human ServicesRAPP AT HOME: $75,000 · Human ServicesHERO'S BRIDGE: $68,068 · Human ServicesVOLTRAN: $20,000 · Human Services+1 more: $7,000 · Human ServicesMENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF FAUQUIER COUNTY INC: $199,111 · HealthSPIRITWORKS FOUNDATION: $100,000 · HealthTHE MCSHIN FOUNDATION: $17,900 · Health+1 more: $9,700 · HealthAFRO-AMERICAN HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION OF FAUQUIER COUNTY: $65,765 · Arts & CulturePIEDMONT DISPUTE RESOLUTION CENTER INC: $43,500 · Arts & CultureKid Pan Alley: $20,000 · Arts & CultureFOOTHILLS FORUM: $17,500 · Arts & CultureAllegro Community Music School: $10,000 · Arts & CultureWINDMORE CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureTHE CHILD CARE AND LEARNING CENTER: $85,053 · EducationRAPPU INC: $40,000 · EducationHEADWATERS THE RAPPAHANNOCK COUNTY PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · Education
Other$4,241,319Philanthropy$846,717Housing & Shelter$388,072Human Services$359,568Health$326,711Arts & Culture$166,765Education$145,053

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFAUQUIER FREE CLINIC INC: $688,550 over 2y, 25% of budgetNORTHERN PIEDMONT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $670,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetFAUQUIER HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $388,072 over 2y, 50% of budgetCULPEPER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP: $200,000 over 1y, 64% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF FAUQUIER COUNTY INC: $199,111 over 2y, 40% of budgetFAUQUIER FISH: $158,717 over 2y, 28% of budgetSPIRITWORKS FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 33% of budgetFAUQUIER COMMUNITY CHILD CARE INC: $97,500 over 2y, 5.8% of budgetAging Together Corporation: $92,000 over 2y, 68% of budgetTHE CHILD CARE AND LEARNING CENTER: $85,053 over 1y, 13% of budgetRAPP AT HOME: $75,000 over 2y, 54% of budgetFAUQUIER COMMUNITY FOOD BANK & THRIFT STORE: $67,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetAFRO-AMERICAN HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION OF FAUQUIER COUNTY: $65,765 over 1y, 24% of budgetVERDUN ADVENTURE BOUND INC: $62,500 over 1y, 22% of budgetRAPPU INC: $40,000 over 1y, 27% of budgetRAPPAHANNOCK GOODWILL INDUSTRIES INC: $20,404 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHEADWATERS THE RAPPAHANNOCK COUNTY PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetFAUQUIER CADRE INC: $20,000 over 1y, 25% of budgetPIEDMONT REGIONAL ORCHESTRA DBA PIEDMONT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $18,000 over 1y, 9.4% of budgetTHE MCSHIN FOUNDATION: $17,900 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTHE CLIFTON INSTITUTE INC: $17,750 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetFOOTHILLS FORUM: $17,500 over 2y, 11% of budgetWINDY HILL FOUNDATION INC: $16,500 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetWINDMORE CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE RAPPAHANNOCK: $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCLOVERLEAF EQUINE CENTER: $9,700 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetGIRLS ON THE RUN PIEDMONT: $7,000 over 1y, 12% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fauquier Health Found…Northern Piedmont Com…The Jesse and Rose Lo…Mightycause Charitabl…Blue Ridge Community …Culpeper Wellness Fou…Fagus FoundationWise FoundationUva Culpeper Medical …The William and Mary …William M Backer Foun…The Jacquemin Family …
Fauquier Health Foundation Dba the Path FoundationVA88× affinity40 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fauquier Health Foundation Dba the Path Foundation · Northern Piedmont Community Foundation · The Jesse and Rose Loeb Foundation Inc · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Blue Ridge Community Foundation · Culpeper Wellness Foundation Inc · Fagus Foundation · Wise Foundation · Uva Culpeper Medical Center · The William and Mary Greve Foundation Inc · William M Backer Foundation Inc · The Jacquemin Family Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fhi Services funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fhi Services. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Fhi Services?

    Find your warmest path to Fhi Services through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2019) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2018, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Fhi Services’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home