· Private foundation
The Jesse and Rose Loeb Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k17 grants · $83k
- $10k–50k14 grants · $348k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE FAUQUIER FREE CLINIC | $43,000 |
| FAUQUIER FISH | $42,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $40,000 |
| COMMUNITY TOUCH | $35,000 |
| THE WARRENTON MEETING PLACE | $30,000 |
| WARRENTON VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY | $30,000 |
| GEORGE WASHINGTON CARVER AGRICULTURE RESEARCH CENTER | $25,000 |
| FOOTHILL HOUSING CORPORATION | $20,000 |
| VERDUN ADVENTURE BOUND | $20,000 |
| RAPP CENTER FOR EDUCATION | $18,000 |
| LINTON HALL SCHOOL | $12,500 |
| SEVEN LOAVES SERVICES INC | $12,000 |
| HOSPICE OF THE PIEDMONT | $10,000 |
| BIRMINGHAM GREEN ADULT CARE RESIDENCE | $10,000 |
| RAINBOW THERAPEUTIC RIDING SCHOOL | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $161k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 5%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +72% since the first grant, against +31% for the ones you funded once.
68 repeat relationships — 22 still active in FY2025, 46 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $127k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FFFAUQUIER FREE CLINIC INC9× · 2017–2025 · $302k · revenue +96%
- CTCOMMUNITY TOUCH INC3× · 2019–2025 · $110k · revenue +72%
- FFFAUQUIER FISH4× · 2018–2025 · $110k · revenue +115%
Funded once
- SVSPERRYVILLE VOL FIRE DEPARTMENTone grant, 2017 · $80k
- RVREVA VOL FIRE AND RESCUEone grant, 2019 · $75k
- NBNEW BALTIMORE VOL FIRE AND RESCUEone grant, 2019 · $71k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Fire and rescue services
To serve the community as a volunteer fire department.
The organization provides emergency, medical, and fire fighting services to the citizens in and around the Burkeville, Virginia area.
Scruggs Volunteer Fire & Rescue Squad provides emergency medical transport services and fire protection to persons and property in Franklin County, Virginia.
The purpose of the Buckingham County Vol. Fire Dept. is to provide fire protection to the citizens of Buckingham County and surrounding counties if needed. We also respond to automobile accidents as well as any other request for assistance.
Provide fire and rescue services to the area of fairfax county, va that is in and around mclean, va
Provide comprehensive primary medical care to the communites served.
Fire protection.
Fire prevention and protection in bluemont and surrounding areas
The painter volunteer fire co. provides fire fighting and rescur services for the citizens of painter, virginia and the surrounding communities.
The free clinic of franklin county, inc is founded on the belief that everyone should have access to quality, affordable, primary health care regardless of their socio-economic or insurance status.
To provide volunteer fire fighting services in the flemington, wv region.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Virginia Piedmont Heritage Area Association and the most unlike its peers is The Warrenton Meeting Place. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 22 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
55 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 55 of the 143 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FAUQUIER FREE CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY TOUCH INC ↗
- Who funds FAUQUIER FISH ↗
- Who funds HERO'S BRIDGE ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE OF THE PIEDMONT INC ↗
- Who funds Culpeper County Rescue Squad Inc ↗
- Who funds RAPPU INC ↗
- Who funds Brandy Volunteer Fire Department Inc ↗
- Who funds Salem Volunteer Fire Department Inc ↗
- Who funds THE CHILD CARE AND LEARNING CENTER ↗
- Who funds FOOTHILLS HOUSING CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds THE WARRENTON MEETING PLACE ↗
- Who funds VERDUN ADVENTURE BOUND INC ↗
- Who funds SPERRYVILLE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC ↗
- Who funds Hospice Support of Fauquier County Inc ↗
- Who funds SEMPER K9 ASSISTANCE DOGS ↗
- Who funds Fauquier Heritage and Preservation Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds PIEDMONT DISPUTE RESOLUTION CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds FAUQUIER COMMUNITY CHILD CARE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Fauquier Health Foundation Dba the Path Foundation · Northern Piedmont Community Foundation · Fhi Services · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Blue Ridge Community Foundation · Wise Foundation · Margaret Spilman Bowden Foundation · William M Backer Foundation Inc · The William and Mary Greve Foundation Inc · The Bank of Clarke County Foundation · Uva Culpeper Medical Center · William a Hazel Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Jesse and Rose Loeb Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Jesse and Rose Loeb Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to The Jesse and Rose Loeb Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.