· Public charity
Uva Culpeper Medical Center
Our mission transforming health and inspiring hope for all virginians and beyond.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 8 grants below total $79,350 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $113,494 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $34,144 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k5 grants · $32k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $48k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CULPEPER HUMAN SERVICES | $25,000 |
| ST STEPHEN'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH DBA CULPEPER FOOD CLOSET | $12,500 |
| CULPEPER WELLNESS FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| CULPEPER SOCCER ASSOCIATION | $8,500 |
| FAUQUIER FISH | $7,500 |
| FRIENDS OF THE CULPEPER LIBRARY | $5,500 |
| SAFE (SERVICES FOR ABUSED FAMILIES) | $5,300 |
| AGING TOGETHER | $5,050 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $32k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +19% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.
8 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 43% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $39k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- OFOrange Free Clinic Inc4× · 2018–2024 · $59k · revenue +52%
- CCCulpeper County Chamber of Commerce5× · 2017–2024 · $50k · revenue +15%
- PRPIEDMONT REGIONAL DENTAL CLINIC INC2× · 2021–2024 · $20k · revenue +100%
Funded once
- UCUVA COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $224k · revenue +279% · 43% of their budget
- RIRAPPU INCone grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -23%
- GCGERMANNA COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue ×44
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To serve the community as a volunteer fire department.
Provide Virginia health plans a voice in promoting quality and affordable healthcare through advocacy, communication, education, and research.
We are focused on, and a resource for, the business, government and community interests of local businesses in and around fauquier county, virginia.
The purpose of culpeper renaissance is to enhance our community identity and heritage, to foster a center of activity and to help ensure economic growth and stability for downtown culpeper through concentrated efforts of design, promotion,…
The free clinic of franklin county, inc is founded on the belief that everyone should have access to quality, affordable, primary health care regardless of their socio-economic or insurance status.
Provide comprehensive primary medical care to the communites served.
SeniorNavigator and its family of websites are national models for aging, disability and veteran information. By combining online assistance with a network of community-based centers, the websites bring over 26,000 community resources,…
The free clinic offers quality medical, dental and mental health care to residents of fauquier and rappahannock counties who lack appropriate alternatives for these services.
The purpose of the Community Health Center of the New River Valley (CHCNRV) is to provide affordable and high quality medical, dental, behavioral, and preventive health care services to people of all ages and circumstances, regardless of…
GoochlandCares (GC) provides basic human services for local individuals who need help with healthcare, housing, food, clothing, and domestic violence services, providing a safety net for 2,135 Goochland residents and their families in 2024.
To provide quality services that enhance and improve life for individuals who have a developmental disability
Virginia community action partnership (vacap) is the statewide membership association for virginia's thirty-one non-profit and public community action agencies. vacaps mission is to build the capacity and competencies of virginias…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Culpeper Wellness Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Culpeper County Chamber of Commerce. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CULPEPER WELLNESS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds UVA COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Orange Free Clinic Inc ↗
- Who funds Culpeper County Chamber of Commerce ↗
- Who funds THE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF FAUQUIER INC ↗
- Who funds PIEDMONT REGIONAL DENTAL CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF FAUQUIER COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds HERO'S BRIDGE ↗
- Who funds Aging Together Corporation ↗
- Who funds RAPPU INC ↗
- Who funds GERMANNA COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RAPPAHANNOCK GOODWILL INDUSTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds Culpeper Soccer Association ↗
- Who funds PEOPLE INCORPORATED OF VIRGINIA ↗
- Who funds FAUQUIER FISH ↗
- Who funds RX DRUG ACCESS PARTNERSHIP ↗
- Who funds VIRGINIA REGIONAL TRANSIT ↗
- Who funds GIRLS ON THE RUN PIEDMONT ↗
- Who funds The Arc of North Central Virginia Inc ↗
- Who funds THE FRIENDS OF THE CULPEPER LIBRARY INC ↗
- Who funds Services to Abused Families Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Fauquier Health Foundation Dba the Path Foundation · Northern Piedmont Community Foundation · Culpeper Wellness Foundation Inc · Fhi Services · The Jesse and Rose Loeb Foundation Inc · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Blue Ridge Community Foundation · William a Hazel Family Foundation · American Woodmark Foundation Inc · Charlottesville Area Community Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Uva Culpeper Medical Center funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.