Skip to content

· Public charity

Ferrari Owners Charitable Foundation

Focf is operated entirely by an unpaid, volunteer board; we have no salaried staff, and our operating expenses relate directly to the fog rally and its fundraising activities.

$84k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$42k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Health$1.3MYouth Development$153kHuman Services$122kEducation$98kHousing & Shelter$7kPublic Benefit$7k
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $42k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $42k
$7,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$102k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MAKE-A-WISH$42,000
HORIZONS$7,000
PROJECT NIGHT NIGHT$7,000
YOUTH NAAVIGATION CENTER$7,000
SIDE BY SIDE$7,000
EAST PALO ALTO KIDS FOUNDATION$7,000
CHILDRENS BOOK PROJECT$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%MAKE-A-WISH GREATER BAY AREA FOUNDA: $375k → 10%Center for Human Services: $17k → 15%MAKE-A-WISH GREATER BAY AREA FOUNDATION: $305k → 10%YOUTH NAAVIGATION CENTER: $7k → 15%MAKE-A-WISH GREATER BAY AREA FOUNDATION: $242k → 10%Larkin Street Youth Services: $33k → 10%MAKE-A-WISH GREATER BAY AREA FOUNDA: $104k → 10%Larkin Street Youth Services: $33k → 10%MAKE-A-WISH GREATER BAY AREA FOUNDA: $98k → 10%Larkin Street Youth Services: $7k → 10%MAKE-A-WISH GREATER BAY AREA FOUNDA: $68k → 10%MAKE-A-WISH: $42k → 10%MAKE-A-WISH GREATER BAY AREA FOUNDA: $6k → 10%Project Night Night: $17k → 10%Project Night Night: $15k → 10%CHILDRENS BOOK PROJECT: $7k → 10%PROJECT NIGHT NIGHT: $7k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 8 repeat orgs$68k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
6

Total granted

$1.7M
$54k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+77%

Still filing today

88%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MF
    MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF GREATER BAY AREA
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +23%
  • BA
    BAY AREA CRISIS NURSERY
    3× · 2020–2022 · $73k · revenue +36%
  • LS
    Larkin Street Youth Services
    3× · 2020–2022 · $72k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • EP
    EAST PALO ALTO TENNIS & TUTORINGgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $17k · revenue +140%
  • MF
    MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL COAST AND SOUTHERN CENTRAL VALLEYgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +128%
  • MN
    MAKE-A-WISH NORTHEASTERN & CENTRAL CALIFORNIA
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -11%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Francisco Casa

San Francisco CASA transforms the lives of children and youth traumatized and displaced in the foster care and related systems by providing one consistent, caring volunteer advocate, trained to address each childs needs in the court and…

Civil Rights
2
Presidio Hill School

Presidio hill school is a co-ed k-8 independent, progressive school. learning is collaborative and an active experience with an emphasis on inquiry. students are engaged in their own learning and guided by an expert faculty through a…

Education
3
East Bay Agency for Children

For more than 70 years, East Bay Agency for Children continues to improve the well-being of children, youth and families by reducing the impact of trauma and social inequalities.

Health
4
The International School of San Francisco

Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…

Education
5
Friends of the Children - San Francisco Bay Area

Impacting generational change by empowering youth who are facing the greatest obstacles through relationships with professional mentors - 12+ years, no matter what.

Education
6
East Bay Childrens Law Offices Inc

The mission of the East Bay Childrens Law Offices, Inc. is to protect and defend the rights of children and youth through holistic, vigorous and compassionate legal advocacy. EBCLO strives to provide a voice for children in and out of…

Crime & Legal
7
The San Francisco School

A private school that cultivates and celebrates the intellectual, imaginative, and humanitarian promise of each student in a community that practices mutual respect, embraces diversity, and inspires passion for learning.

—
8
San Francisco Schoolhouse

An intentionally small community where young people are valued as individuals. A compassionate team of educators approach academic & social-emotional development with the aim of cultivating justice-seeking humans empowered to transform…

Education
9
Cypress School of San Francisco F/K/a Cow Hollow Preschool

Cypress school of san francisco is a play based full day program, serving children aged 2-5.9 years old. we are a parent participation school with a low teacher to child ratio and licensed master teachers on staff.

Education
10
Children's Council of San Francisco

By advocating for quality early care and education, empowering families with information and financial support, and building the capabilities of educators, Children's Council of San Francisco ensures that every child in San Francisco has…

Human Services
11
The Kids Co-op Inc Dba Mariposa Kids

Support and inspire children's natural curiosity and independence through free play during their out-of-school time.

Education
12
Mentis

Mentis provides bilingual professional mental health services to people throughout the county of every age, stage, and income level.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Northeastern & Central California; the most unlike its peers is Htmelle Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
11/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF GREATER BAY AREA: $1,239,218 · Human ServicesMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF GREATER BAY AREALarkin Street Youth Services: $72,250 · Human Services+3 more: $70,000 · Human ServicesEAST PALO ALTO KIDS FOUNDATION: $87,750 · PhilanthropyHTMELLE INC: $80,750 · EducationSAN FRANCISCO FRIENDS SCHOOL: $7,000 · EducationBAY AREA CRISIS NURSERY: $72,750 · OtherNapa Valley New Deal: $7,000 · OtherLIFEMOVES: $7,000 · OtherSide By Side: $39,000 · HealthMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL COAST AND SOUTHERN CENTRAL VALLEY: $10,000 · HealthMAKE-A-WISH NORTHEASTERN & CENTRAL CALIFORNIA: $10,000 · HealthEDGEWOOD CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $3,000 · HealthEAST PALO ALTO TENNIS & TUTORING: $17,000 · Recreation & Sports
Human Services$1,381,468Philanthropy$87,750Education$87,750Other$86,750Health$62,000Recreation & Sports$17,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF GREATER BAY AREA: $1,239,218 over 8y, 5.0% of budgetEAST PALO ALTO KIDS FOUNDATION: $87,750 over 4y, 9.8% of budgetHTMELLE INC: $80,750 over 3y, 95% of budgetBAY AREA CRISIS NURSERY: $72,750 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetLarkin Street Youth Services: $72,250 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSide By Side: $39,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT NIGHT NIGHT: $39,000 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetCENTER FOR HUMAN SERVICES: $24,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEAST PALO ALTO TENNIS & TUTORING: $17,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL COAST AND SOUTHERN CENTRAL VALLEY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH NORTHEASTERN & CENTRAL CALIFORNIA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FRIENDS SCHOOL: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S BOOK PROJECT: $7,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetLIFEMOVES: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEDGEWOOD CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

McNabb FoundationDE13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: McNabb Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · United Way Worldwide · Charities Aid Foundation America · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ferrari Owners Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ferrari Owners Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ferrari Owners Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Ferrari Owners Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ferrari Owners’ filings →

    More from the funding graph